WITH HITLERY, ‘NOTHING’ MATTERS BUT THE MONEY…

It only took five days after the New York Times first published explosive allegations of sexual harassment against him for failed presidential candidate Hitlery to release a statement distancing herself from top Democrat fundraiser and disgraced Hollyweird mogul Harvey Weinstein.  It was in a statement issued on Twitter by some former campaign flunky, Nick Merrill, that she is supposed to have said: “I was shocked and appalled by the revelations about Harvey Weinstein. The behavior described by the women coming forward cannot be tolerated. Their courage and the support of others is critical in helping to stop this kind of behavior.”  And as is always the case, Hitlery would have never issued any sort of statement, even allegedly, about these sick allegations if she had not been pressured into doing so.   

And it was according to the ‘Clinton News Network’, aka CNN, that Hitlery aides were described as being somewhat “confused” by her silence and were even asking why she had not said anything about the allegations.  The network also noted Weinstein’s long-standing connections with Hitlery & Co. going back to when he donated to ‘Slick Willy’s’ legal defense fund back in the 1990s.  It also pointed out how it was that Hitlery rented a home next to Weinstein in the Hamptons in 2015, while Weinstein acted as a big-money bundler for Hitlery’s 2016 campaign.  Hitlery also headlined a number of high-dollar fundraisers at Weinstein’s home in New York City.  CNN had also ramped up the pressure, asking just this past Tuesday of both Obummer and Hitlery: “What the heck is taking them so long?”

And then during an interview with Fareed Zakaria, CNN’s resident Moslem cheerleader, portions of which were broadcast on Wednesday’s edition of CNN’s “OutFront,” that failed Democrat presidential nominee Hitlery was finally able to bring herself to officially denounce Harvey Weinstein’s perverted and disgusting behavior and announced that any money she has received from him would be “part of” the 10% of her income that she donates to charity every year.  What caught me a bit off guard was the fact that Hitlery stated that she actually gives anything to charity.  Who knew?  Personally I’ve always thought that the Clinton motto, when it came to giving money to charity, was, “Charity Begins At Home.”  And I’d be very interested to know how it is that she defines ‘charity.’

Hitlery said when she first heard the news about Weinstein, “I was just sick. I was shocked. I was appalled. It was something that was just intolerable in every way. And, you know, like so many people who’ve come forward and spoken out, this was a different side of a person who I and many others had known in the past.”  She added that she “probably” would have called Weinstein a friend.  Hitlery continued, “People in Democratic politics, for a couple of decades, appreciated his help and support. And I think these stories coming to light now, and people who never spoke out before having the courage to speak out, just clearly demonstrates that this behavior that he engaged in cannot be tolerated.”  Odd that this comes from the wife of ‘Slick Willy’ Clinton, whose behavior differs little from that of Weinstein.

Hitlery also stated that she will donate the money she received from Weinstein to charity, adding, “I give 10% of my income to charity every year. This will be part of that. There’s no doubt about it.”  And of course like so many in Hollyweird, and elsewhere, she also denied knowing about Weinstein’s behavior or knowing anyone who knew.  Exactly, and she's singing the same song as those now throwing Weinstein under the bus, some of whom were the very same freaks who petitioned our government to pardon pedophile creep Roman Polanski and demanded his extradition orders be dropped. They're all alike, it’s only the level of evil that’s different.  So we’re supposed to believe that over the course of the 30 years NO ONE knew what a scumbag this guy was?  Seriously?  

But look, these revelations now coming out about Weinstein shouldn’t surprise anyone.  And have you noticed how it is now that the floodgates have opened regarding the behavior of other Hollyweird bigshots.  Accusations are now flying all over the place, from Ben Affleck being accused of groping an actress to a video of Jimmy Kimmel asking woman to guess what he has in his pants and to maybe put her mouth on it.  And yes that would be the very same Jimmy Kimmel who got all teary-eyed about the Republican attempt to scrap Obamacare and who came out being very much in favor of also scrapping the Second Amendment.  Democrats like to talk about values but it’s these people who demonstrate what those values really are.  And with Hitlery, it’s always been about the money.

But you know, what’s truly frightening here is when you stop and consider just how many morons and morally bankrupt people actually voted to make this woman our president.  But then when you realize that the majority of her supporters are made up primarily of bitter, angry feminists, black racists, illegal aliens, and career welfare trash all of whom are just as morally bankrupt as she is, it all begins to make a lot more sense.  And then there’s the fact that you’ve got what is essentially an army of big money donors, many of whom who aren’t really all that different from Weinstein and who are only too happy to support those candidates who they view as being much more sympathetic to the perversions enjoyed by this same bunch of what are really nothing more than average Democrats. 

And just think for a moment about all the things that this guy, Weinstein, has done to an untold number of women which may never see the light of day.  And then think for a moment about all of the accusations, including one of rape, that have made against ‘Slick Willy’ over the years.  So just how ‘sick, shocked and appalled’ could Hitlery really have been?  After all, she’s been married to someone who is just as twisted as Weinstein, for 42 years.  And then think about all of those people, including Hitlery, who comprise the Democrat Party and much of the media, who knew all along about the perverted behavior of these two men and who then worked so diligently to keep it all covered up.  But then this is how these people, these Democrats, operate, it’s all about moving the leftist agenda forward.

And now that their cover may have finally been blown, this is what the left looks like when they're caught with their pants down!  It's like catching a group of kids doing something that they know they shouldn’t be doing.  They haven't had time to compare lies, come up with a joint cover story, decide, as a group, who to blame it on, or any of the normal stuff we always end up having to deal with when it comes to those on the left.  And it’s because so many of them engage in essentially the same type of behavior that now has them at such a loss for words.  Because, more often than not, they appear rather conflicted because they are trying so hard to appear outraged over what is the very same type of behavior that they themselves take part in, or someone they know personally does.

THE HITLERY CRYBABY TOUR…11 MONTHS AND COUNTING…

Has there ever been anyone who, after running for president and losing, continued to harp on that fact for 11 months, and counting, especially after experiencing what many have described as being the most humiliating defeat in modern political history?  Personally, if it were me I would go into a self-imposed exile instead of spending all of my time coming up with increasing idiotic excuses for why I lost?  Nor would I persist in demonstrating my refusal to accept defeat by doing nothing more than to carryon about what a terrible president the guy who defeated me has turned out to be.  I mean, why would anyone, especially someone who has been involved in politics for over 30 years want to keep reminding people about how it is that she managed to get beat by someone who had never before run for public office?  It seems to me that you’d want people to forget. 

And so here we are, nearly a full year after the last presidential election, and still Hitlery is unable to accept the fact that she was actually defeated by Donald Trump.  She remains stubbornly unable move behind the fact that she lost to someone who was a total newcomer to the world of politics, and who no one thought had a chance of winning.  And it goes beyond simply accepting defeat.  She’s now resorted to making all manner of rather absurd accusations against the man responsible for her defeat.  Just this past Monday, at the University of California-Davis, failed Democrat presidential candidate Hitlery went so far as to describe President Trump as being nothing short of being “insidious and subversive to democracy.”  And I thought, what a coincidence!  “Insidious and subversive” are exactly how I've described the threat posed by Hitlery, and the left, to our Republic.

Hitlery said, “There is no such thing as an alternative fact. And despite the best efforts by some to wage war on truth, reason, and evidence we cannot let that happen.”  She continued by saying , “When leaders deny things we can see with our own eyes like the size of a crowd of an inauguration it is just frustrating to us that pride ourselves on living in a fact-based universe, it is insidious and subversive to democracy. And when they refuse to accept evidence on everything from the settled science of climate change, to what is actually being proposed — because all you have to do is read it — in their so-called tax reform it has real-world consequences that will only get worse.”  How about when a known sexual predator is accused of rape or inappropriate sexual advances involving a young woman, and all Hitlery does is to trash the women involved, is that not an “alternative fact?”

Anyway, Hitlery went on to say, “Just last week the Trump administration announced a new rule that would allow any employer or insurance company to refuse to cover contraception if they have a religious or moral objection. Now that just doesn’t undermine every woman’s right to make her own health decisions it flies in the face of medicine, science, and facts. Thanks to decades of hard work and investment in prevention American is now at a thirty year low of unintended pregnancy, a forty year low for teen pregnancy and the lowest abortion rate since Roe v Wade was decided. And no matter your political party or ideology that has something to do with access to birth control.”  She acts as if all forms of contraception were have suddenly become banned in the U.S.  She’s so transparently dishonest.  We know she’s lying as soon as she opens her mouth.

Hitlery once said something about the pointlessness of living in the past, that doing so prevented one from seeing opportunities in the present yet she has done nothing but relive the election for the past 11 months.  Oh well, I suppose if it keeps her stuck in what is nothing more than what has become a perpetual pity party it’s all the better for us.  But you have to think that she comes across as looking kind of desperate to most in the general public.  Americans, whatever their political leanings, tend to dislike those engaged in self-pity.  And in so doing, Hitlery continues to hand more and more ammunition to her opposition, which is fine with me.  I’ve always thought it odd how the left continues to claim that she’s so smart and experienced when it’s every time she that opens her mouth she proves that it’s just the complete opposite that’s true.  She lost because she ran a horrible campaign. 

And I gotta tell you, any woman who actually chose to believe any of the garbage that Hitlery spewed during the last campaign, or continues to buy any of the excuses she has come up with in her effort to explain her ‘unexpected’ loss, I would argue, can be lumped together as little more than a bunch of uneducated and exceptionally gullible females.  Every woman has the right to access birth control, however, people who do not believe in it, should not have to be forced into paying for it.  If birth control is truly something women want, then they can add it into their budget, and purchase it.  It's not that expensive.  And for those who can't afford a few dollars for birth control, then perhaps they should re-think the whole notion of recreational sex and perhaps practice a little self-control/discipline.  Why should I be forced into subsidizing anyone’s desire to have sex?

And lastly I must admit that deep down inside that I hope Hitlery keeps on with her self-destructive, albeit rather pointless, desire to run down our president.  Please Hitlery, I beg you, keep on pushing his buttons.  I know you think you’re safe and remain confident that he won’t bother coming after you, even after promising to do so if elected.  But if the truth be told, once you hit his bad side there’s going to be no turning back, regardless of what dirt you think you may have on him.  And then he’ll crush you, and ‘Slick Willy’, like the bugs you are.  Because while he may not be the richest guy on the planet, he’s got more than you do, despite all your money-making little schemes.  So please keep it up, Hitlery, because I just bought me a big ol’ case of popcorn, a case of beer, and have the DVR all set to go so I can watch, and then re-watch, the ‘Hitlery Goes to Prison’ show.    

HOLLYWEIRD AND THE MEDIA, PERVERTS OF A FEATHER…

Never will you be able to find a greater concentration of perverts, addicts and/or just plain freaks than you’ll find in Hollyweird.  A place chock full of crazies of every stripe who somehow feel entitled to critique the lifestyles of those who refuse to go accept the rather bizarre way they choose to go through live.  Yup, big brave moral Hollyweird!  They don't have a problem with standing up to Trump but they have been, for nearly 30 years, rather accepting of Harvey ‘The Pervert’ Weinstein's systematic abuse of women.  If Kim Jong-un launches a missile toward the West Coast I just hope it’s Hollywood that becomes ground zero.

And it has recently surfaced, courtesy of a former New York Times reporter who investigated allegations of sexual harassment against Weinstein going as far back as 2004, that actors including Matt Damon and Russell Crowe lobbied the Times to kill her little expose.  In a column for ‘The Wrap’, the entertainment industry trade outlet that she founded, former reporter Sharon Waxman claimed that while investigating the then-recently appointed head of Miramax Italy, Fabrizio Lombardo, sources claimed he was installed in the position solely to arrange escorts for Weinstein, and that he had no prior filmmaking experience.

And then, in what was a pathetic attempt to shield their buddy, Weinstein, from a potentially damaging story, both Damon and Crowe allegedly contacted Waxman to “vouch” for Lombardo’s credentials.  Hey, it’s what these people do, they protect one another’s preferred perversions.  Ms. Waxman wrote, “After intense pressure from Weinstein, which included having Matt Damon and Russell Crowe call me directly to vouch for Lombardo and unknown discussions well above my head at the Times, the story was gutted.”  Ms. Waxman went on to say, “I was told at the time that Weinstein had visited the newsroom in person to make his displeasure known.” 

Waxman also spoke to a British woman who claimed she had been paid off by Weinstein after what she described as being an “unwanted sexual encounter” but was bound by a non-disclosure agreement.  However, the story was eventually killed by The New York Times, after Waxman said the Times’ then-culture editor Jon Landman found it ‘unimportant’.  Waxman wrote, “‘He’s not a publicly elected official,’ he told me.  I explained, to no avail, that a public company would certainly have a problem with a procurer on the payroll for hundreds of thousands of dollars.  At the time, Disney told me they had no idea Lombardo existed.”

Waxman added that she was “devastated” that her story was finally published over a decade after she corroborated the evidence.  She went on to say, “I was devastated after traveling to two countries and overcoming immense challenges to confirm at least part of the story that wound up running last week, more than a decade later.”  And she continued by saying, “Today I wonder: If this story had come to light at the time, would Weinstein have continued his behavior for another decade.”  So you have to wonder how many more women would go on to be molested by this pervert, and shouldn’t Damon and Crowe be considered as accomplices to the crimes?

And oddly enough, yet another, at least potential, accomplice in all of this weirdness should be none other than George ‘Looney’ Clooney, who has worked with Weinstein for 20 years and although he claims never to have ‘witnessed’ Weinstein’s history of sexual harassment, he admitted to taking the rumors “with a grain of salt.”  It was in an interview with the Daily Beast that Clooney said, “We’ve had dinners, we’ve been on location together, we’ve had arguments.  But I can tell you that I’ve never seen any of this behavior—ever.”  For anyone believing this drivel, I’ve got some prime ocean front property in Arizona that I can let you have really cheap.

Because while Weinstein has reportedly been sexually harassing his employees and actresses for nearly three decades, Clooney said he had heard some rumors but he simply turned the other cheek every time.  He said, “I’ve heard rumors, and the rumors in general started back in the nineties, and they were that certain actresses had slept with Harvey to get a role.”  And he went on to say, “It seemed like a way to smear the actresses and demean them by saying that they didn’t get the jobs based on their talent, so I took those rumors with a grain of salt.”  Really, George?  What that sounds like to me is nothing more than a lame response and a cop out.   

Clooney admitted that there were warning signs, but never would have thought that Weinstein was going to the point where he had to pay women to keep quiet.  He said, “A lot of people are doing the ‘you had to know’ thing right now, and yes, if you’re asking if I knew that someone who was very powerful had a tendency to hit on young, beautiful women, sure.”  And added, “But I had no idea that it had gone to the level of having to pay off eight women for their silence, and that these women were threatened and victimized. I’ve been talking with a lot of people about this and I don’t know many people who knew of that.”  What a bunch of bullshit!

But look, there’s nothing really new here, Hollyweird has always been like this, hiding the sexual and drug, escapades (even the criminal ones) and sexual proclivities of its big name stars, directors, producers, etc. was just routine, all part of the cost of doing bussiness.  Consider Fatty Arbuckle, Rock Hudson, Montgomery Cliff, Roman Polanski, hidden, covered up and protected.  As for the women, the ‘casting couch’ has always been around and probably most of the women considered it just what they had to do to get the good roles and their name up in lights.  Sad to say, that attitude hasn't actually changed as much as you would have thought.

Those in our state-controlled media complex can also be said to have been accomplices.  They have long been charged with the covering up of bad behavior and have been very accommodating when it comes to those in our entertainment industry.  Thus, the media has played a critical role in destruction of our country, knowing, that if it could destroy the family, sufficiently undermine the Judeo-Christian standards of behavior and morality, then America could be made to belong to the left forever.  Acceptance of drug use, recreational sex of every sort and all manner of gender redefinition, could never succeed without the media’s very enthusiastic championing.

All our favorite media types from Walter Cronkite to Peter Jennings, Tom Brokaw all the way to today's con artist driven ‘fake news’ circus barkers makes those in the state-controlled media complex the champions of oppression and tyranny.  And isn't it amazing how no one in leftist Hollywood, or the media, or the Democrat Party, of which Weinstein has always been a strong supporter, knew anything about this until just last week?  All they do is tell us how deplorable and stupid we are, how we need to ignore our values and belief and be more accepting of perverse behavior.  When in truth most of them are either perverts or simply enablers.  We should turn them off.

As we all know, or should know, the media in this country has had a very sinister agenda for some time.  An agenda that has them thinking we’re too stupid to understand and that they can easily con us when it comes to things like the protecting of scum like Weinstein.  Anyone with any amount of sense can tell this guy is a pervert just from looking at him.  And yet the New York Times was willing to keep hidden Weinstein's nasty deviant criminal behavior for decades.  Believe me, the New York Times is an organization of the left and seeks to protect others of the left, and in so doing enabled this pervert to cause women to suffer for more than a decade.

You can say what you want about the so-called right-wingers, but they live much closer to what they preach than do those on the left have been doing for decades.  We on the right ask people to live within their means, not to break the law and not to kill innocent children just because they might cramp your lifestyle.  Meanwhile, Al Gore preaches from on high about how we are destroying the world with our carbon footprints while enjoying life by making one of the largest footprints the Earth has ever seen.  Hollyweird spends time condemning the way regular folks choose to live, while taking part in every perversion imaginable.  And Democrats just don’t care.

DEMOCRAT ADAM SCHIFF, A FISCAL CONSERVATIVE?? WHO KNEW???

It is once again that we have been provided with what is yet another perfect definition of hypocrisy by a Democrat who, as difficult as this may be to believe, recently saw fit to lecture our Vice President on the topic of fiscal responsibility.  This after not so much as uttering a peep for the last eight years as a Democrat president took it upon himself to essentially double our national debt.  Democrats have a funny habit of only getting stingy about spending public funds in two very specific circumstances: military spending, and anything perceived to be politically beneficial to Republicans. The latter cause, seems to have turned California Democrat Adam Schiff into a fiscal conservative.  I know, right?  Sure didn’t see that coming!  You?

As most of you are likely aware, yesterday Vice President Pence chose to leave a football game where we had players who thought it a good idea to disrespect our flag.  He later tweeted: “I left today's Colts game because @POTUS and I will not dignify any event that disrespects our soldiers, our Flag, or our National Anthem.”  To which Adam ‘Crazy Eyes’ Schiff responded, also via Twitter, “After all the scandals involving unnecessarily expensive travel by cabinet secretaries, how much taxpayer money was wasted on this stunt?”  After Pence tweeted about leaving the game, President Trump then tweeted that he had asked him to leave if any players chose to protest.  More 49ers have protested than any other players for any other team in the league.

Look, Schiff and those like him are hopeless.  I mean if they truly do hate America as much as they seem to, and it’s such a horrible place for them to have to live, they should have the balls to just pack up and leave.  No one is stopping them, least of all me, and with a U.S. passport they can go pretty much anywhere on the planet without a problem.  I mean the list of socialist ‘paradises’ to which they could go is limitless and they could go to any of these ‘utopias’ and live happily ever after.  Of course, the definition of ‘happily ever after’ in any of these countries would be about two seconds after you make any kind of derogatory remark about one of their ‘great’ leaders or perhaps take a knee while they’re playing the national anthem.

It would be a little easier to take Schiff seriously if perhaps he was complaining about how, for the last 20 years, the American public has spent more than $7 Billion dollars to build or renovate NFL stadiums, taking on 46 percent of the total costs of those projects, and how it is that the owners and players end up keeping 100 percent of the profits they make courtesy of their taxpayer subsidized structures.  Yet instead, we have this moron doing nothing more than trying to turn the tables with another “well the Republicans do it too” scenario.  In effect he’s admitting that, yes, we Democrats are completely over-the-top with our spending habits, but if we can find an instance where we can claim Republicans are too, then that makes it all okay!    

As far as I’m concerned, wasteful government spending isn't acceptable when done by either party.  It’s just that the Democrats have made it THE fundamental feature of all of their policies and have developed it into somewhat of an art form.  And stunt or not, which it most assuredly was not, Trump and Pence took a tactic out of the Democrat handbook and threw it right back into their faces, but for a noble and just cause.  And it's working.  NFL ratings have continued to plummet and yet we still have these overpaid punks, albeit a few less than there was when this insanity began, doing their best to somehow justify their pathetically juvenile behavior while being provided with some level of support by Democrats like this moron Schiff.  

Here’s a question, how much money has been wasted by Schiff and his fellow Democrats on the many investigations that they remain determined to keep going, with no justification?  How much money is Mueller and his cabal of Democrat lawyers spending in desperation to find something that can then be used to embarrass the president?  And all in an effort to somehow justify the fact that Hitlery didn’t lose the election because she was a horrible candidate, she lost because she was somehow cheated out of her chance of becoming the nation’s first female president.  Let’s face it, Schiff is a scumbag of the highest order.  Nothing more than a treasonous snake, who hates America and her people.  You have been exposed again, Mr. Schiff.

I have to tell you, Mr. Schiff, you are just too, too funny!  A Democrat pretending to be concerned with governmental spending?  Let’s face it, coming across a Democrat who’s actually concerned about the spending of taxpayer money would be like coming across a Bigfoot.  It’s just not going to happen.  So you can make all the noise you wish but as a Democrat, as well as someone who represents a district in the most fiscally screwed up state in the nation, you really have no credibility on the subject.  I mean, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to take people like Schiff seriously, regardless of the issue that’s being ‘discussed’.  We have a bunch of multi-millionaires disrespecting our country and our flag, and the left sees it as being no big deal.     

You see, where once upon a time love of country, and support for the military were sentiments that could easily be found among those who called themselves Democrats, as those folks died off, they were apparently replaced by those who have nothing but contempt for their country as well as for those who volunteer to fight for it.  And whether we’re talking about scumbag politicians, brain-dead entertainers or athletes who have obviously taken one too many shots to the head, most seem to be cut from the same unpatriotic cloth.  And what’s ironic is that had any of these people so determined to run down their country been born in any other country, the chances of their being able to acquire the level of wealth that they have, is beyond remote.  

GERALDO, ALWAYS A DEFENDER OF THE LEFT’S AGENDA…

If 74 year old Geraldo, aka Gerry, aka Gerald, Rivera has come to prove anything, it’s that if you’re able to hang around long enough there will always come to be at least a few folks who may actually come to take you as someone who resembles a serious ‘journalist’.  But why it is that any organization that professes itself to be a bona fide ‘news’ organization would continue to allow this fraud anywhere near the premises is beyond me.  He rarely has his facts straight and tends to throw accusations around that have absolutely no basis in truth.

And once again, as recently as this past week, his face was plastered across televisions everywhere as he made the claim that he ‘believes’ manufacturers of “bump stocks” or suppressors should be held accountable for criminal actions of their customers.  Now what this guy thinks he knows about these bump stocks that millions of other Americans didn’t even know existed until this nut used two in Las Vegas is beyond me.  Am I to believe that Gerry is so well versed in weapons that he knew right away what it was?  Somehow I doubt it.

It was in trying to support his claim that Gerry said, “Regardless of your last point that you can do…you can improvise your own bump stock.”  And he said, “I think manufacturers who create devices like bump stocks or silencers or other devices that have no reasonable utilization…other than to be more efficient killing machines…I believe those manufacturers of the bump stocks should be held liable when they are used—-those bump stocks and other similar devices–to inflict damage on others.”  Again he’s doing little more than rambling.

Those who have been watching the nearly 24/7 ‘news’ coverage since this horrific attack that took place in Las Vegas, know that shooter Stephen Paddock had two ‘bump stocks’ in his possession when he was found dead in a Mandalay Bay hotel room after killing 59 people and injuring over 500 at a country music festival.  Of course the real reason behind this never-ending ‘news’ coverage is not to keep us all informed, it’s to keep it all fresh in our mind in order to provide the Democrats with time to advance their anti-gun agenda.  

I guess, in a way, it was good to see old Gerry back to using his “from Al Capone's vault” logic again.  But really, this sort of thing will fly only when it’s ALL manufacturers who are held to the same standards concerning the criminal misuse of their products.  You know, when Ford becomes liable when some drunk in his, or her, F-150 takes out a family of 4 headed home from a family vacation, or Stanley becomes liable for the illegal use of one of their hammers, or Apple is held liable for when a Moslem uses an I phone to detonate a bomb.

And it doesn’t stop there, far from it.  How about the alcoholic beverage industry being held responsible for any injuries, domestic violence/abuse, driving deaths, rapes, etc. which were done or participated in by anyone consuming their product. Or the Rap music industry being held responsible for inciting violence and promoting sexism against women.  Or how about the sugar industry being held responsible for selling and/or promoting a product that causes obesity and diabetes.  So to single out gun manufacturers is really rather pointless.

Gerry is another, on what has become a very long list of many, of those seeking nothing more than to take the easy way out.  When I was kid we didn’t see these mass shootings, of course what we did have was God in our schools and families with two responsible parents who cared.  Gerry is simply showing us his leftist tendencies.  He very rarely makes sense, because like I said, if you applied his failed logic to one company you’d have to apply to all companies.  Perhaps he should think before he speaks and be satisfied to only be thought of as a fool.

But then, what are we really to expect from a guy like him anyway?  Because you see, Gerry does represent a dichotomy of a sort.  You see, Gerry is one of those people essentially without self-definition.  And, dare I say, Gerry is more than just a little predictable, and, more often than not, he doesn’t come across as sounding all that intelligent, although he tries so very hard to do so.  And he’s always willing to sign on with the many other blind followers and/or surrogates, of just about any liberal politician and is never shy about spewing the party line.

The bottom line here is that Gerry is the perfect guy for any leftwing propaganda segment on any one of the many television tabloids, be it MSNBC,CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox or any of the rest.  And so, regardless of just how pathetic, if not absurd or idiotic, he may sound, his remarks do actually serve a purpose.  With his willingness to talk about just about anything, without solid and/or actual facts to back-up his statements, we end up with a ‘clown-effect’ that at times serves as comic relief.  Put more simply, Gerry Rivera is just another charlatan.

ALEC BALDWIN, USEFUL IDIOT, OR JUST YOUR AVERAGE MORON???

I’ve always thought that when someone is involved in the selling of a product, regardless of how involved, they should go out of their way not to exhibit any sort of behavior that would make it harder for the maker of that product to convince as many customers as possible to purchase it.  And while of late there have been some football players who have taken a slightly different tack, many of those in Hollyweird have long been treating those counted on to buy their product as if they were somehow less than human.  And with the election of Donald Trump as president, they seem to have become even more unhinged.  And so now I find myself wondering why should I be willing to spend what it costs to see their movies, effectively paying the salary of those who think I’m a racist, or worse?

And really, just how many times is it that you can accuse everyone who chooses to disagree with your idiotic political points of view of being either a racist or a Nazi, or both, and our president of being another Hitler before such labels become meaningless.  Because when you accuse everyone of being a racist, no one is racist and when we’re all Nazis, can anyone be said to be a Nazi.  Which brings me, once again, to that perennial leftwing loon and longtime Hollyweird moron, Alec Baldwin.  Baldwin is the perfect example of all that Hollyweird has become.  Because long gone is the love of country by our movie stars who actually served in the military.  The majority of Hollyweirdos today would never even consider doing such a thing.  They’re not big fans of the military.  

Apparently he recently sat for an interview for the October issue of British GQ.  Baldwin, as you know, often parodies the president on Saturday Night Live.  Although he said he was in no way comparing President Trump to Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler, he did seem to go well out of his way to imply as much when he said, “What you see with Trump is how Hitler got elected.”  Commenting on President Trump's success, Baldwin said, “Now, I am by no means comparing Trump to Hitler, I would never do that.... What you see with Trump is how Hitler got elected. Someone who will say anything to people because of their economic interest.”  But in making such baseless and rather incendiary statements about President Trump, Baldwin too is disparaging those of us who chose to vote for him.  

In his other remarks about the president, Baldwin said, "One of the real tragedies for him, on a Shakespearean level, is that his name is ruined."  He went on to say, "His children are going to have to change their names when he gets out of the White House."  And he added, "Everything that he wanted to achieve, the opposite has resulted."  He said, “I think the powers that be, the money behind the Republican Party, they'll have to get the smell out of the room so that [Mike] Pence can be the runner in 2020.”  And added, “And the sooner they get rid of him the better.”  Baldwin said, “How much more are they going to put up with?”  And in exhibiting what I assume was a little wishful thinking, he said, “I don't think they'll put up with much more.... I imagine he'll resign.”

But you know, the interesting thing here is that if we were to replace every reference Baldwin makes to President Trump with a reference to Obummer, his description of how he sees things would be far more accurate.  Because how was it that Obummer was able to get elected and then re-elected?  Who was it, if not Obummer, who was willing to say whatever he thought necessary to get himself elected?  And who was it if not Obummer, who, with the help of the state-controlled media, was able to keep the fact that he was a very devout socialist well under wraps.  And who was it, if not Obummer, who promised to “fundamentally transform” the United States of America?  And yet this imbecile, Baldwin, chooses to compare, by not comparing, President Trump to Hitler?    

The thing is that I very much doubt Baldwin, like so many others of those in his so-called ‘profession’, is intellectually competent enough to backup any of the accusations he makes with actual irrefutable facts.  But maybe I’m wrong.  His Hollyweird rants, straight out of grade school, have resulted in what exactly?  Who is it that he has managed to convince to come over to his side?  More often than not he and his ilk are doing little more than preaching to the choir.  And as the rhetoric continues to intensify, I can’t help but wonder how any rational human being can take any of these Hollyweird types, like Baldwin, seriously.  They accuse those who disagree with them as being filled with hate and do this by using some of the most hate filled language imaginable.

Baldwin describes President Trump as being, “Someone who will say anything to people because of their economic interest.”  But I’d like to ask Mr. Baldwin:

Which party leader said: “You didn't build that?”

Which party leader was responsible for the lowest labor participation since the 1970s?

Which party leader was responsible for the worst economic recovery since the 1940s?

Which party leader was responsible for the lowest home ownership rate in 50 years?

Which party offers free medical care, college race quotas, hiring quotas, $15 an hour minimum wage in exchange for votes?

What party allowed the government to essentially assume control of General Motors only to sell it to labor unions at half the stock purchase price?

What party wants to forgive college loans, provide ‘free’ education for illegal aliens, supports sanctuary cities and open borders?

Seems to me only one party is constantly telling one group of people how much free stuff they deserve if they will only vote for Democrats.

Baldwin is nothing more than your common, everyday Democrat stooge.  A useful idiot of sorts, a hack and a mediocre actor at best who somehow thinks that folks outside his little circle of jerks actually care about what he thinks.  At the end of the day Hitler owned the media and if anything negative was ever said, those who said it were never around to say it again.  It's incredible the contrast that these Hollyweird idiots try to make and yet never get it right.  When you stop and compare just some of what Obummer got away with, it’s he who comes across looking far more like Hitler than does President Trump.  You would think that the fascist parallels would be impossible to ignore.  And yet those on the left have absolutely no trouble whatsoever when it comes to doing just that.    

Baldwin's historical comparisons indicate that he doesn't have a clue about history.  So just to refresh Baldwin and his fellow crackpots about what Hitler was, he was a progressive-vegetarian-atheist-socialist-drug addict, who thought that all profits and businesses should be strictly controlled by an all-seeing, all-powerful centralized government.  He did not believe in redistribution of wealth, but he did believe in the control of all wealth, and the acquisition of most wealth and routing into a central treasury, for use by the government to provide things for the public, collectively.  Because banks and corporations couldn’t be trusted to work for the people’s best interests, only the government can do that.  So Alec, which party in American politics does that sound like? 

MOOCHELLE O, THE DEVOTED RACIST…

I wish I could laugh every time I heard some imbecilic Democrat, or leftwing media flunky, accuse President Trump of being a racist.  But I can’t, because it was for eight long years that we had a couple of bona fide racists occupying the White House without a word ever being said.  And it would seem to be a trait they not only possessed before arriving at the White House, but also carried on after leaving.  And nothing makes this more painfully clear than some recent comments made by ex-first lady, Moochelle Obummer, with her making the recent claim that it’s the Republican Party’s lack of diversity that makes Americans distrust the political process.

It all came about during an on-stage interview at the ‘Pennsylvania Conference for Women’ on Tuesday that the ex-first lady made the statement that when she attended the State of the Union address she would notice the Republican side was “all men, all white,” and that was why she argued many people of color “don’t trust politics.”  Moochelle said, “We should be working actively to mix it up, so we’re getting a real broad range of perspectives on every issue. Shoot, I would see that in Congress.”  She explained, “At the State of the Union address … when you are in the room what you can see is this real dichotomy. It’s a feeling of color almost.”

But ever determined to leave no doubt that she is anything other than the absolute worst kind of racist, Moochelle went on to say, “On one side of the room is literally gray and white. Literally, that is the color palette on one side of the room. On the other side of the room, there are yellows and blues and whites and greens.  Physically, there’s a difference in color, in the tone, because on one side all men, all white, on the other side some woman, some people of color.”  And she added, “I look at that, and I go, no wonder. No wonder we struggle, no wonder people don’t trust politics. We’re not even noticing what these rooms look like.”

And so, according to Moochelle, “If people haven’t had the experience of being other and out, and you are trying to fix the problem of those folks, it’s hard to come up with the right answer when you haven’t lived it.”  This coming from someone of whom I think it far to say is incapable of learning, and it’s only because her racist ideology gets in the way.  And I would argue that she would be doing herself a ‘yuge’ favor if she were to simply shut up and be thought of as a racist instead of opening her mouth and removing all doubt that she is.  Sadly, it remains pretty undeniable that Moochelle and Barry are essentially cut from the same, ugly, racist cloth.

And it should come as no surprise that it was at the same conference that Moochelle made sure to leave herself plenty of time to criticize President Trump’s message to young Americans as much worse than that of her husband’s.  She said, “Many of the young people today, they only know Barack Obama as their president and what that standard felt like and what kind of messages were being talked about… They grew up only under hope and possibility and options and opportunity and creating more space.”  And she argued, “I think they will feel some of what’s happening now as intrinsically not what they were taught.”

Now that might be a legitimate beef if slaves were still made to be working the fields here in America.  But since we haven’t had slaves, a least in the generally accepted sense, for over 150 years, it's really kind of a cop out.  When will enough time have finally passed that we can finally put it behind us?  If everyone just took responsibility for themselves and their kids and focused on working hard, getting educated, and staying out of trouble, Voila!, we would have a great country.  But that said, slavery, in a sense, does still exist in 2017 America.  And it’s called the Democrat Party.  And there remains those willing to throw their fellow blacks under the bus.

Democrats give blacks little more than crumbs every month to live on, and sadly blacks seem to be more than happy to take whatever ‘free’ crumbs come their way.  It’s the plantation mentality all over again with Barry, and the wife, being little more than a glorified overseers.  Barry got 99 percent of blacks to vote for him and then proceeded to leave them far worse off than they were either time they voted for him.  And yet blacks in America could not have been happier than to have a black man in the White House.  Such behavior gives an entirely new meaning to being ignorant.  And yet it’s Moochelle who has the nerve to accuse the Republicans of being racist.   

Let’s face it, it doesn’t take a genius to recognize the fact that Moochelle is really nothing more than a lifelong racist.  You’ve just have to have been paying attention.  It was revealed pretty early on in Barry's 2008 campaign just how racist she truly is. Then she was sent away to “charm school” over the summer of 2008 and Hitlery's operatives would later teach her how to fool people.  But still, if you spent any amount of time watching her during her years in the White house, her deep-seated racist tendencies were something that she couldn’t control all the time.  She’d let something slip and would therefore offer a glimpse into how she really felt.

And I've said it before that LBJ, and the Democrat created ‘Great Society’ welfare system essentially hamstrung the Black community, and pretty much as a whole.  Between the breakdown of the black family unit, and I mean the traditional family with two adults who parent and contribute to the success of the family, and a ballooning social welfare system which resulted in creating an entitlement mentality, the black community as a whole was hamstrung.  Then add in the propaganda from the state-controlled media and Hollyweird, and it all becomes just so very sad.  But I will say, those who have taken the opportunity to get out, flourish and succeed.

And yet according to those like Moochelle the continuing plight of the black community has nothing whatsoever to do with the unwillingness of most blacks to take on some level of responsibility for how their lives turn out, or the fact that far too many are quite content to take whatever the Democrat Party is willing to steer their way in exchange for their vote.  And as I have said before, perhaps if blacks in this country chose to behave in a more appropriate, and dare I say adult, manner perhaps they would tend to bring less attention to themselves and therefore would have less to complain about when doing anything “while black.”

But if blacks insist upon following the lead, in the manner they have for decades, of such pathetic racists as Moochelle, and her even more overtly racist hubby, I can pretty much guarantee that they will see very little, if any, improvement in things as they go through life.  Now they can continue to fall for the incendiary rhetoric spewed by Moochelle and the other race pimps, or they can come to the conclusion that to continue to do so takes them nowhere but down a dead end street.  But no one can make the decision for them.  Either they want to join the rest of us who want nothing more than to be self-sufficient and left alone, or they don’t.

THE DEMISE OF LATE NIGHT TELEVISION…

I’ve never been one for late night television.  At least since the days, and I may be showing my age here, of Johnny Carson.  And with the arrival of Leno I watched a little less, and I did watch a little Letterman in his early days.  And with those who have now assumed the helm of late night, it’s become no longer worth my time.  Regardless of which of these knuckleheads, Fallon, Colbert, Meyers or O’Brien, we may be talking about, there seems to be not a dime’s worth of difference between any of these supposed late night comics.  They all seem to have forgotten what it was that brought folks back night after night to watch Carson.  They’ve forgotten that it’s supposed to be about being funny, not gross, rude, inappropriate, or political to the extreme.  Which brings me to he who can very easily be considered the ‘Poster Child’ for this the latest batch of imbecilic late night TV hosts, Jimmy Kimmel. 

And to see why it is that I say that we need look back no further than Kimmel’s politically inspired diatribe from this past Monday night when we were supposed to believe that Kimmel was actually moved to tears over the recent Las Vegas attack.  It was during what he described as being his opening monologue that Kimmel set about pushing for more gun control before proceeding to bad-mouth Republicans.  But he said not a word about the number of innocents gunned down in Chicago each and every month.  Knowing as we do what his political affiliation is we shouldn’t have been surprised.  But that said, Kimmel was right to lament the “59 innocent” who are dead as result of the Las Vegas attack, but as is usually the case with these celebrity zealots from the left they are rather selective when it comes to those issues that they choose to highlight and then go on a rampage about.

Because nowhere in Kimmel’s diatribe/monologue was there any lamentations for the more than 63 individuals who were killed on average every single month in Chicago during 2016 (the Chicago Tribune reported a total of 762 murders for 2016).  Nor was there any mention of the nearly 4,400 victims who were shot and wounded during 2016.  But Kimmel, as someone who is likely constantly surrounded by his own well-armed security team, actually suggested that Republicans ought to be ashamed of themselves for not passing more gun control now.  Chicago is a tough one for those on the left because all manner of gun control imaginable has been tried, including an all-out ban on handguns — so Chicago is actually a case study in the ineffectiveness of gun control; an example of how murder numbers rise when strict gun control laws are in place.  So what they do is to pretend that it simply doesn’t exist.

Kimmel responded to critics on Tuesday, essentially blaming them for “the fact that almost anyone can get any weapon they want.”  And it was in making such a ludicrous statement that Kimmel accomplished little more then to make quite clear, to anyone who might have happened to tune in, just how ignorant of the facts he truly is.  He began by saying, “I want to send special good wishes to those watching from Las Vegas, where you know what happened on Sunday night. I’m not gonna get deep into it again, I said what I had to say last night.”  He then went on to say, “But I do want to say something to these nuts who spent most of the day today on television and online attacking those of us who think we need to do something about the fact that 59 innocent people were killed.”  He said, “They say it’s inappropriate to be talking about it because it’s too soon.” 

And it was then that he went on to add, “Well maybe it’s too soon for you, because deep down inside in your heart, you know you bear some responsibility for the fact that almost anyone can get any weapon they want, and now you want to cover yourself until the storm of outrage passes, and you can go back to your dirty business as usual.”  And he concluded his idiotic rant by saying, “But it’s not too soon for us.”  And added, “because we’re Americans, and the last time I checked, the First Amendment is at least as important as the Second Amendment, so we will talk about it, and shame on you for suggesting we do otherwise.”  So what makes this turd, who has a team of ‘writers’ writing his material for him and who, apparently, has Chuckie Schumer as a consultant, think we’re ok with being lectured to?  Maybe before he starts shooting mouth off he should search out the facts.

And yet, Kimmel offered nothing in the way of an apology for his deception during his Tuesday night ‘monologue’, nor did he rectify his failure to ‘cry’ over those killed in gun-controlled Chicago — 536 so far this year — the way he ‘cried’ over those killed in gun-friendly Nevada.  Instead, he doubled down appealing to his First Amendment right to say what he said and mocking those who called him out on it.  By Kimmel's logic, those who are opposed to the Second Amendment can be said to share responsibility for the mass slaughters by governments of their own citizens.  This collectivism is one of the dangers of the socialist ideology.  A collective is a group.  Socialists want people in groups.  They identify their supporters in groups and then they group and attack their opponents in the same way.  They create and continue their division through this collectivist ideology. 

But let’s face it, Kimmel is only doing what his masters tell him to do.  He's virtue signaling like all get out.  His ‘crocodile tears’ are as phony as his acting.  Of course he's going to politicize this tragedy.  His does the same with healthcare and his constant attacking of Republicans.  He's nothing more than a partisan hack doing the Democrats’ dirty work.  His ‘tears’ and ‘heartfelt feelings’ on the tragedy in Las Vegas are all fake...just like him.  Of course he's not going to shed any tears of concern for the people in Chicago getting shot and killed every month there.  He doesn't care.  He didn't get the script with the talking points all laid out for him to speak.  He has cues to learn, you know.  He would never bring what happens in Chicago up because guess who controls that city, and nearly every other big city, the Democrats.  It would make them look bad.  So it all has to be against the Republicans, all the time.

While this recent shooting was indeed a tragedy, I think we need to keep in mind that it’s on average that there are 96 deaths per day in America resulting from auto crashes.  And are those deaths any less tragic?  And where’s Kimmel’s outrage over CAFE standards?  Or for the 91 Americans who die every day from an opioid overdose.  Excessive drinking kills 1 in 10 Americans.  About 1 in 8 Americans, and Kimmel may be one himself, are considered alcoholics.  The top causes of death in America are Heart disease 633,842, Cancer 595,930, chronic lower respiratory diseases 155,041, Accidents 146,571, Stroke 140,323, Alzheimer’s disease 110,561, Diabetes 79,535, Influenza and pneumonia 57,062.  With all the planning and horror the shooter inflicted upon an innocent crowd of 20,000 the numbers reveal 99.7% of them escaped alive and it’s no small measure the miracle that is.

With the radical liberals in Congress and Hollyweird saying that all country western fans are Republican gun nuts and making their insane comments can we also assume then that the shooter was a Democrat or a Hitlery supporter.  Because in nearly every violent act, shooting related or otherwise, the perpetrator is nearly ALWAYS some nut from the Left.  The Left and their ilk are responsible for nearly all major acts of violence in the world. They always dismiss the actual murderers who identify with them, and immediately blame anyone and everyone else who are not on the Left.  Calling them out on their playbook, showing others their instant response is always to defend the criminal or terrorist murderers by providing the cover of blaming everyone else.  Be that the NRA or the Second Amendment.  Maybe what we need to place a limit on is Liberals being able to buy a gun.

The people that are shot in Chicago, and in every other major, Democrat controlled city, are willingly sacrificed by those on the left because it allows them to generate higher gun violence numbers in the U.S. which they can then use to justify the need for more, and far stricter, gun laws.  That is why they tend not to prosecute the criminals to the fullest extent of the law.  And yet where’s the outrage from Kimmel about that?  There is none.  Because to point that out would be seen as breaking ranks.  This is simply selective outrage of the left on parade.   Kimmel has blood on his hands, he is one of the alt left fascists acting as a megaphone for people like Hitlery, Bernie and failed ex-president Obummer. Helping them get out their calls for violence against President Trump and his supporters.  Encouraging alt left fascist violence with a chuckle and a nod.  Well, you leftists got your wish.  

The sad truth is that Democrats care far more about their agenda than they do about the people who foolishly vote for them.  But that seems to bother folks like Kimmel very little.  Kimmel, still isn't being honest with America.  And he seems to have no problem whatsoever when it comes to spewing his dishonest drivel whether he’s talking about healthcare or gun control.  He seems only too willing to intentionally mislead people by failing to disclose, for example, how he had been prepped for months by Chuckie Schumer regarding his recent rant on yet another Republican attempt to repeal and replace Obamacare.  He kept that all very well hidden because had he divulged that information, he would have been discredited as being nothing more than partisan political hack.  Not that many of those who tune in to watch his antics every night would care one way or the other.  They’re as sick as he is.  

DEMOCRATS AGAIN RUSH IN TO EXPLOIT A TRAGEDY…

Every time there is a tragedy like the one on Las Vegas, the first thing out of the mouth of liberals everywhere is gun control. They don't particularly care about those who died or were injured, it just makes them sound like they care and is another way of trying to get more of their kind elected.  Chicago and Detroit have continually killed inner city people for years and yet Democrats simply sit on their hands and do nothing because this is not about public safety, it’s about controlling the people.  And what Democrats, and their friends in the media, seek to do is not to find a solution to the problem, but instead to use these dead bodies as the basis for their propaganda that this can all be solved if only we make ‘commonsense’ changes to our gun laws. 

Question: Has the Democrat Party now gotten its kook base so worked up over the issue of gun control that one of their own would willingly take it upon themselves to commit an atrocity on the level of what we witnessed in Las Vegas, in the hopes that it could then be used to advance the cause?  Now of course the primary recipient of Democrat outrage is now, and always will be, the National rifle Association (NRA).  But I’m thinking that if there truly is an interest on the left to determine who it is that is truly at fault, they really need look no further than the nearest mirror.  And let’s face it, if stricter guns laws were truly the answer to gun violence, would not Chicago be the safest place on the planet, instead of the planet’s murder capital.   

And Democrats now have every ‘fake news’ organization out there screaming the stricter gun laws are the only possible way to finally rid us of these mass shooting tragedies.  This is how they exploit a tragedy.  What they either don’t realize, or simply choose to ignore, is that there is no gun control law that would have prevented this tragedy.  The shooter was using a machine gun which is illegal to own.  All the stupid laws that the Democrats, and their allies in the media, continue to come up with only effect law abiding citizens because the simple fact is that criminals will ALWAYS be able to get any type of gun they want illegally.  And by continuing to go after our law abiding citizens they reveal what it is that they are really up to. 

And in their continuing effort to never let a good tragedy go to waste, the Democrats wasted precious little time in tripping all over themselves in the effort to be the first to get to the nearest microphone in order to exploit the nation’s latest mass shooting.  And a perfect example of someone who exhibits such a warped mentality as this would be none other than Democrat Senator Chris Murphy, who called for pushing gun control immediately following a mass shooting in Las Vegas, and then went so far as to actually say that he believes any grieving period is nothing more than a “tool of the gun lobby.”  Now just how sick do you suppose one has to be to make such a brutally ignorant comment?  But then he is a Democrat, so perhaps that explains it.

And so it was that during an appearance on MS(LSD)’s ‘Morning Joe’ the esteemed Mr. Murphy said, “It’s a very convenient tool of the gun lobby to say that there’s got to be a 24-48 hour waiting period before we talk about change.” He ultimately blamed Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock for Sunday’s massacre, but also blamed federal and state laws.  He went on to say, “The reality is that much of it is rooted in the evil inside this one individual, but much of it is also rooted in our laws, which allowed him to get his hands on weapons that are illegal in almost every other civilized country.”  And he reiterated his support for banning semi-automatic rifles and bump stocks, and said he wants to start pushing for these changes “immediately.”

And it was this very same imbecile, Mr. Murphy, who went on to say, “Maybe he still would have taken a pistol and shot through the window. Killed perhaps dozens below. But it would have been difficult without the semi-automatic weapon and the modifications that are still legal to this day, in this country. So I think we’ve got to talk about change immediately.”   Mass shootings represent one percent of gun casualties in America, he claimed and said murders with 10 or more victims have doubled since an assault weapon ban expired.  Murphy continued to name the infamous “gun lobby” as Public Enemy number one, and believes the lobby purposely focuses on the most recent mass shooting to distract from past tragedies.

He said, “I think the gun lobby wants you, in the wake of a mass shooting to only talk about the policy changes that would have affected the shooting that happened the day before.”  And, of course, he went on to compare Paddock to Newtown, Conn., shooter Adam Lanza, claiming mass shooters would think twice if they were denied rifles and tactical gear.  He said, “In Newtown we ask ourselves whether Adam Lanza would ever have walked into that school if he didn’t have tactical weaponry.”  And he concluded, “There is a false bizarre kind of courage that comes with attaching yourself to these kinds of very powerful weapons, and there is a question as to whether these shooters would ever take up position if all they had was a pistol.”

So perhaps the ever-so-sophisticated Mr. Murphy might want to tell us exactly what laws could have been enacted that would have prevented this latest tragedy?  Do we need laws to force people to buy guns with a background check?  Oops, this guy did buy his guns after submitting a background check.  Maybe we need to force gun manufactures into making guns that can’t be changed over to fully automatic?  Oops again, they already do that.  So just what, exactly, is this clown’s point?  Does he even have one?  Personally, I don’t believe he has a point other than to advance the claim that if only we had stricter guns laws there would never be another of this type of tragedy.  This boob is the Poster Child for the politically demented.

Murphy is another radical leftwing socialist Democrat who hates the Constitution and individual liberty.  He’s little more than a political grandstander who, like all Democrats, is always seeking only to create some level of political advantage out of any tragedy.  Murphy is as deranged as those who decide to pick up these weapons and kill innocent people.  And what he and his fellow Democrats seek to accomplish is the complete removal of guns from law abiding citizens, which would result in nothing more than an escalating body count which would then be further exploited to put all those who manufacture guns out of business.  Which would leave the American people as being little more than sitting ducks against an increasingly tyrannical government.   

And keep in mind that if Democrats are so desperate in their attempt to advance their call for complete gun control and confiscation, might they go to the extreme of orchestrating attacks like the one in Virginia on Republicans practicing baseball or even this Las Vegas massacre?  Frankly, I wouldn't put anything past them and all you have to do is to see listen to liberals like this boob Chris Murphy who will say absolutely anything, and do anything, to be relevant just before an election years and especially when he's up for reelection.  And personally, I’m wondering just how long it’s going to be before we find out that this Paddock guy was a registered Democrat.  Or, is that one of the facts that our media folks will manage to keep concealed?  

‘CRAZY UNCLE JOHN’ KASICH THREATENS TO LEAVE THE GOP…ADIOS JOHNNY…

I could be wrong but it’s in at least one regard that there would seem to be one rather striking similarity between ‘Crazy Uncle John’ Kasich and Hitlery.  That being, of course, that they both seem unable to get over the fact that the American people just could not bring themselves to elect either of them as their president.  And while Hitlery’s list of reasons has become legend, ‘Crazy Uncle John’s’ rationale is that the Republican Party has simply moved too far to the right.  So far, in fact, that he’s now making noise about leaving the party.  My only response to him would be, “Don’t let the door hit you in that ass on the way out!”

It was just this past Sunday that Kasich made an appearance on the ‘Crappy News Network’, aka CNN, and voiced his supposed concern regarding the direction the GOP now seems to be headed.  And it was during an interview with Jake Crapper that Crapper asked, “I get that you’re not going to support Judge Moore, but he believes that homosexual acts should be illegal. He questions where Barack Obama was born. He’s written that Keith Ellison, the congressman from Minnesota should not be allowed to serve in congress, because Ellison is a Muslim. What role should the Republican Party play when it comes to Roy Moore’s campaign?” 

Kasich responded saying, “Well, look, I don’t run the party. I can tell you for me, I don’t support that.”  And he went on to say, “I couldn’t vote for that. I don’t know what the heck I would have to do, but I don’t live in that state. Those claims are–I mean, they’re ludicrous and they’re divisive. And if that’s where we’re headed, well, first of all, we can’t–remember, I wrote that book. An America united or divided, you know, two paths.”  Kasich went on to say, “If the party can’t be fixed, Jake, then I’m not going to be able to support the party. Period. That’s the end of it.”  So what is it that Kasich is expecting as a response from Republicans? 

I mean, is he expecting that there will be some massive groundswell of support for him, with folks saying, “Oh no, Mr. Kasich please, please don’t leave the Republican Party!”  Well if I was a betting man, I’d be pretty willing to bet that that certainly ain’t something we’re gonna see happening!  Republican voters already look at Congress and complain that see very few differences between the two political parties.  As most are likely very aware, Kasich has continued to be intensely critical of both the president and the Republican Party since his 2016 presidential campaign ended with little more than a resounding thud.   

We all know, or should know by now, is that Kasich won’t ever be a member of the Donald Trump fan club.  He referred to Trump’s response to white supremacist violence in Charlottesville, Va. as “pathetic,” pilloried Trump’s executive order on refugees and migrants, and sided with the knuckle-dragging snowflakes of the NFL in an ongoing dispute over the propriety of staging protests during the observance of the national anthem.  All of which would seem to make it painfully obvious that Kasich has essentially already left the GOP.  Not that it matters one way or the other, most voters view him as being the pathetic RINO that he is.    

And let’s face it, I think we all know that Kasich has never been someone that we could call a true conservative.  What he has been, and for a very long time, is a very vocal, and very prominent, member of ‘The Republican Establishment’.  So his idiotic threat about possibly leaving the party should come as no real surprise.  In fact, it should be greeted with a certain level of enthusiasm because as far as I’m concerned, it comes as being some pretty good news.  I think that he’d be much more at home operating under the Democrat banner and he’s the perfect example of what we already have far too many of in the Republican Party.

And if Kasich were being honest with us, he’d admit that he’s already left the Republican Party.  After all, rumor now has it that he may be trying to set himself up to make another run in 2020, only this time as an Independent.  In other words he wants nothing more than to act as spoiler when President Trump comes up for re-election.  Why else would he want to run?  He’s got to know that if he ran as a Republican he’d be crushed like the bug he is.  When has this loser ever supported a bona fide conservative in his party?  He supports himself and the McCains of the party.  He was a loser in the primary and he’s still a loser.

And while I beg to differ with Kasich, it’s Judge Moore's views that really aren’t all that different from the views held by a majority of those in mainstream America, and are the same views Ronald Reagan held that got him elected TWICE in landslides. Kasich and the rest of the RINOs can keep on backtracking from our moral roots right into oblivion if they wish.  Give Judge Moore a little exposure and we’ll see very quickly that it's not just Alabamians who like Moore!  A lot of Americans like him for his stance against homosexuality, same sex marriage and immigration.  And if we’re being honest he agrees with President Trump on the important issues.

So I can only assume that Kasich must be living in some sort of alternative universe.  I mean, here we have a guy who couldn't manage to get out of the low single digits in his last White House attempt and now somehow has delusions of grandeur that apparently has him thinking that he would be able to do much better as an Independent?  And when it comes to those things that can be considered as being ludicrous, it’s the fact that Kasich, in any way, feels confident in proclaiming himself to be a conservative.  That’s the most ludicrous of all.  He’s never been a conservative, and you’re a fool if you have ever thought otherwise.