Yes there was once a time when I thought old Judge Napi actually knew what he was talking about, but that now seems such a long time ago. These days he sounds as unhinged as does just about any Democrat. Rumor has it he went asking for a seat on the Supreme Court and President Trump turned him down, so since then old Napi seems to have gone all Scaramucci. So I’d say we dodged a rather sizable bullet.
And I say that because it was on Monday of this week, on Fox Business Network, that Napi let fly with his latest rant directed at the president saying President Trump’s call to the Ukraine president where he has confirmed he mentioned 2020 presidential candidate and ex-vice president ‘Creepy Joe’ Biden was an “act of corruption,” if true. But wasn’t the act of corruption actually committed by ‘Creepy Joe?’
Anyway, Judge Napi said, “I think this is the most serious charge against the president, far more serious than what Bob Mueller dug or dragged up against him. If there was a quid pro quo. It does appear as though a quarter of a billion dollars in defensive weaponry was held back for a period of time while these eight conversations were going on between the president.”
And Napi continued, “If you are the President of the United States and making a conversation that you know your intelligence community is listening to, of course you’re not going to articulate a quid pro quo. You’ll just make the quid pro quo happen.” Napi needs to unclench and deal with reality like other former anti-Trumpers who’ve found that President Trump is actually on our side.
He added, “This is probably the end of Joe Biden’s presidency and it ought to be the end of his dream for the presidency, but doesn’t diminish one iota what the current president is doing which if an act of — if true, we haven’t seen the whistleblower complaint, and, under the law it has to be revealed — if true, this is an act of corruption.” ‘If’ true? “Rumor has it Judge Napi is a pedophile, if true why is he still on TV?”
And you know, that has to be one of the dumbest things I think I’ve ever heard from this boob, unless, of course, he was being sarcastic, which I doubt. The president hasn’t committed a single crime. Napi can’t name one illegal action he’s taken, yet he will still sit there and lie. The cognitive dissonance is remarkable when it comes to today’s Democrat’s. They ignore facts and just spew emotional drivel. It’s pathetic.
And yet, not a single word was uttered about how Hunter Biden received a $3 Million payment from this company. Not a single word about the $650,000 payment he received from a front company for the Bank of China. Not a single word of the $1.2 Million payment he received from a shell company represented by a Swiss bank which was under no less than six separate investigations for money laundering.
And let’s be honest here, Napi, how is what the president did any different than if the Mexican president had called President Trump and told him a Mexican citizen suspected of drug crimes is doing business in America and always comes back to Mexico with lots of money, please look into it and have your FBI investigate. Nations cooperate like this. This is not corrupt nor is it, by any measure, an act of treason.
If ‘Creepy Joe’ is suspected of corrupt business practices then the President, as the chief law enforcement officer of our nation, besides having the authority, also has every right, to vocalize this with other national leaders where he might be doing corrupt business. It just goes to show the lengths these ‘NeverTrumpers’ will go in their continuing effort to bring down our duly elected president.
Look, it’s pretty common knowledge that the Bidens engaged in what was nothing less than extortion and money laundering with the prior Ukrainian administration. With a new president in place, President Zelensky, it was ENTIRELY appropriate for our president to mention it to him and suggest that it be investigated and the fact that ‘Creepy Joe’ is a presidential candidate is Creepy’s problem, not the president’s.
And as a matter of fact, I suspect that when ‘Creepy Joe’ announced his candidacy he did so knowing full well that with a new Ukrainian president, President Trump would bring his misdeeds to President Zelensky's attention, and hoped to prevent that just by being a candidate. Now he has the nerve to cry foul for being called out for having actually bragged about his blatant act of corruption on behalf of son, Hunter.
And does Napi seriously think that after all the corruption, including a coup attempt, against President Trump by the ‘Deep State’ the public is going to tolerate this attempt to say there was a quid pro quo with the Ukrainians while ignoring the ACTUAL interference by ‘Creepy Joe’? Judge Napi seems to forget the Ukrainians have already confessed to helping the DNC to try to kneecap then-candidate Trump.
And by continuing to attack the president in such an insidious manner old Judge Napi has only succeeded in revealing himself to be someone who is nothing but a fool and a dupe of the left. And in so doing he has made it very clear that President Trump was quite correct in passing him over for a seat on the high court. And it is his attacks on the president that say far more about him than they say about the president.
I find it all rather strange that this supposed judicial analyst, Napi, fails to recognize the fact that ‘Creepy Joe’ has committed a very serious crime against our nation and it’s President Trump’s job as chief of law enforcement to gather the evidence and protect our nation from these kinds of crimes. Just like in our big cities, it’s actions taken to actually enforce our laws that are now actually said to be the crime.
What kind of a Judge was Napi? I mean the President asks a government if our ex-vice president, now looking to be our next president, used our taxpayer money to extort a foreign government and the good judge thinks that’s the corruption taking place here? Fox has got to get a new lineup. Napi would be a far better fit over at the Communist News Network (CNN) or the Mostly Stupid News Broadcasting Company (MSNBC).
The main argument here seems to be that it’s anyone running for office, as long as they are a Democrat, can’t be held accountable for their crimes. Yet it’s according to them that Trump committed a crime merely by running for office. And he has been accused of behaving like some tin horn, banana republic despot whenever he tries to hold our supposed leaders accountable for their obvious corruption. Make sense?
No comments:
Post a Comment