SHEILA JACKSON LEE SPEWS MORE ANTI-GUN DRIVEL…

Sheila Jackson Lee, otherwise known as she who is perhaps the dumbest bitch on the entire planet, recently declared that American’s should not be permitted own automatic weapons.   Now when it comes to just how ignorant the esteemed Ms. Jackson Lee is, you certainly don’t need to take my word for it.  You really need to do nothing more than to simply wait for her to open her big mouth.  For example, it was during a speech this past Wednesday on the floor of the U.S. House that this genius said that we must also close gun loopholes and expand background checks and then tried to link automatic weapons to gun related crimes.  No keep in mind here this is the very same individual who thought America planted a flag on Mars.

As was recently reported in the ‘Free Beacon’, Jackson Lee attempted to use the fear-based “automatic weapons” phrase to make her point about reducing the Second Amendment rights of law abiding Americans.  Jackson Lee began in her little 5-minute diatribe by saying, “Simple legislation that could be passed. I think it is crucial in America that we do so, because the violence has many roots–housing, health care, poverty, but certainly it has the tool, and that is guns.”  And then she went on to say, “That is automatic weapons like AK-47s and others more sophisticated. America has a right to the Second Amendment, but the people of America have a right to safety and the prevention of gun violence in their community.”

It was pointed out by the Free Beacon, “that people frequently misuse the phrase “automatic weapons” when they are actually referring to “semi-automatic weapons.” Many handguns and sporting rifles are semi-automatic. The AK-47 is manufactured in both automatic and semi-automatic models. In a semi-automatic weapon you must pull the trigger each time you want to fire. An automatic weapon will fire as long as you hold the trigger, until you run out of ammunition. Rarely are fully automatic weapons used in crimes. In fact, their ownership is already highly restricted and registered nationally.”  And as we all know those who are most often prone to misuse the nomenclature of “automatic weapons” are Democrats. 

In offering a critique of Jackson Lee’s comments, Charlie Hoffmann of the Free Beacon wrote: “Automatic weapons are not commonly used in gun crimes in America, however. Since 1986, the sale of newly manufactured automatic weapons to civilians have been banned. If an individual wants to purchase an automatic weapon, they have to go through a strict vetting process while also registering that weapon with the federal government. As a result, automatic weapons are also very expensive to personally own.”  Jackson Lee’s attempts to associate automatic weapons with gun violence are disingenuous, at best, and likely would have a difficult time passing even the most cavalier of fact-checks.  But that doesn’t prevent her from making them.

I would suggest that perhaps Ms. Jackson Lee spend just a bit more of her very valuable time trying to familiarize herself with the 1968 Gun Control Act which actually defines a semi-automatic weapon as being "any repeating rifle which utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fired cartridge case and chamber the next round, and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge."  The key part there is the "separate pull of the trigger", or in language simple enough that even Jackson Lee should be able to understand it, one pull equals one shot.  The law speaks clearly about what it means by the term semi-automatic. When it comes to the term "automatic," a little inference is required.

And then there’s the 1934 National Firearms Act which defines a machine gun as being "any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger."  Note that part about more than one shot fired by "a single function of the trigger."  Or in simpler language, again for the benefit of Jackson Lee, one pull equals many shots.  That’s the legal difference between a semi-automatic and a fully automatic weapon, a concept that Jackson Lee either fails to understand or one she very purposely misstates for purely political purposes.  Which is usually the case with Democrats.  When the fact don’t support their plans, they simply ignore them.

Jackson Lee is so dumb that she actually makes Nancy Pelosi appear smart.  A Democrat who represents Texas’ 18th congressional district, Jackson Lee once suggested during an address to her congressional colleagues that the Constitution and the American system of governance has lasted about 400 years.  She said at the time, “Maybe I should offer a good thanks to the distinguished members of the majority, the Republicans, my chairman and others, for giving us an opportunity to have a deliberative constitutional discussion that reinforces the sanctity of this nation and how well it is that we have lasted some 400 years, operating under a Constitution that clearly defines what is constitutional and what is not.”

Now ordinarily I wouldn’t give a rat’s ass about anything that Jackson Lee has to say on any subject?  But I’m always concerned about the Democrats continuous quest for never ending control and power that has created the problem of gun violence in America. They want voters who only support Democrats and who willingly allow them to fundamentally change our country to serve their purpose.  Instead of doing the right thing, the Democrats want only to take away the Second Amendment to our Constitution.  Think about it, if the Democrats really gave a damn, and really cared about gun violence and gun crimes they would join with Republicans in demanding that the thousands of gun laws already on the books be enforced.

And what’s really disgraceful is the fact that our liberal state-controlled media goes out of its way to perpetuate the Democrat propaganda by repeating ad nauseam the data concocted by Democrats but that has absolutely no basis in any actual fact. They go out of their way to paint the most dire picture imaginable, while ignoring completely how things got to be so bad.  Take for instance the city of Chicago, the city that has some of the toughest gun laws in the nation, and yet has the nation’s highest murder rate.  This November the American people must overwhelmingly vote all these damn Democrats out of office.  They are determined to take away our Second Amendment, but even more importantly they are not serving the people!

BABS BOXER, ONE OLD COW TRYING TO DEFEND ANOTHER OLD COW…

It was just this past Tuesday, on MSNBC, that those watching were made to watch as one tired old cow worked hard to defend yet another tired old cow.  It was while discussing the recent presidential debate that Hitlery supporter, Sen. Babs Boxer, a Democrat, made the rather idiotic claim that because Donald Trump interrupted Hitlery his actions were “absolutely” a “disrespect of women.”  So, apparently, if I’m understanding old Babs correctly, Mr. Trump was to do nothing more than to stand quietly behind his podium and speak only when spoken to, while Hitlery and Lester went about having a nice conversation just between themselves.  If Trump hadn’t taken the opportunities that he did to insert himself into the debate, he likely would have ended up being little more than a target.

Now we all know that when it comes to these wackos/bimbos who populate the left in this country, if there could somehow be a world completely devoid of all men they likely wouldn’t be bothered by that in the least.   Anyway, old Babs made her appearance on something called, ‘Live with Tamron Hall’.  And just to let you know how things went down, here’s just part of the idiotic little exchange that took place between these two mentally challenged individuals:  First it was Ms. Hall who asked, “I got to quickly ask you this—about the number of times he interrupted her. Vox.com said Hillary Clinton was interrupted 25 times in 26 minutes. By the time it was over, Trump had interrupted her 51 times, where she interrupted him just 17 times. Does that read to you as a disrespect?” 

To which old Babs responded by saying, “Absolutely. It’s a disrespect of women. I could tell you, I remember very well the first time I took office in a local office, I couldn’t get three words out, Tamron, before my male colleagues jumped down my throat. It’s something that they do. I don’t even think they realize it. But I think Donald Trump did realize it. He tried to take her off her game, and guess what?  She was so presidential. She didn’t let it get to her. She finished her thought. and, you know, I thought his interruptions were rude and wrong, really. Once in a while, sure but not 51 times.”  So dare I ask, just how any times might one be permitted to interrupt a women before one is considered to be disrespectful?  Is it 5 times, 10 times or perhaps 20 times?  How many is too many?

I guess I would also ask Babs if Hitlery's hateful, rather deceitful defense of her sexual predator husband is considered reprehensible.  If you want "disrespectful" and "deplorable", how about the little tidbit that came from one of Hitlery's many "hit men" assigned to assassinate the credibility and reputation of the INNOCENT WOMEN Hitlery’s rapist husband assaulted.  That would be: "Drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park and see what you get."  I’m sure that that's what Babs saw, that's her prism.  And I'm sure African-Americans saw Trump's challenge to Holt's antics to be racist, and Muslims saw his defense of our National Security as Islamophobic.  And I'm sure most unhyphenated Americans saw only what they wanted to see and heard only what they wanted to hear.  It’s par for the course.

All I’ve got to say to these two imbeciles, is, “Quick ladies, run to your safe zones!”  And let’s be real, shall we.  If Trump hadn't interrupted her he would have likely had much less opportunity to make any of his points.  Which, I suppose, some might have seen as being a good thing.  Because it seems that old Lester allowed Hitlery blather on and on well past her allotted time, on multiple occasions, while at the same time keeping Trump to the rules.  Which may help explain Trump’s eagerness to get his points out.  I haven't seen the tally yet but I suspect she still managed to talk more than Trump by a significant amount.  And as we know, Holt was happy to spend too much time on Trump’s tax returns while staying very far away from Hitlery’s continuing email saga, and her Clinton Foundation woes.

So anyway old Babs seems to be under the impression that when a man interrupts a woman DURING A DEBATE, that that somehow shows disrespect?  If that’s the case then I guess I would I would question her understanding of what a debate actually is.  At least one that takes place here in America??  Now I’m quite sure she’s of the opinion that most men should be seen and not heard.  Unless, of course, they’re some sort of leftist wingnut Democrat for whom such a rule does not apply.   Maybe old Babs should ask Trump's previous debate opponents about this.  Because I think it’s fair to say that he was pretty much of an equal opportunity interrupter of both men and women. But that matter little to this leftist loon, as she will obviously say anything no matter how absurd.

And ya know, I think we could argue that Trump didn't interrupt a woman.  While the person he interrupted can be called a female, they can also be identified as being nothing more than a no-good-lying-sack-of-crap who did nothing but sit on their rather sizeable ass while an Ambassador and his security staff were being attacked, and murdered on the anniversary of this nation’s worst terrorist attack, 9/11/2012.  Four American lives were lost and all due to their inability, or unwillingness, to make a decision, as well as the need to keep from the American people potentially damaging information close to an election involving Barry “Almighty”.  This was the first time this country had had an Ambassador killed since those not so thrilling days of the Jimmy Carter.  Another scumbag Democrat!

These pseudo-intellectual, baby-boomer-bitches really piss me off.  The hippy generation, of which old Babs is a proud member, is the filthy scourge responsible for bringing this country to the brink of destruction, and very purposely I might add!  And every last one of these pathetic scumbags deserves to be barred from ever being able to serve in public office in any capacity!  And what I find so incredibly amusing is this constant playing of the woman card with respect to Hitlery.  Is she running for the highest office in the land or is she running to be the woman filling in for the leader of the Free world?  If the first option, then she stands as an equal with no favors or deference to her being a woman.  Which foreign leader is it that would ever provide her with that privilege?  None that I can think of.

LESTER ‘THE COURT JESTER’ HOLT…

Well the first debate between our two primary presidential candidates is now in the can.  And as far as I’m concerned it more closely resembled playing a poker game where only one player was aware the deck was marked.  And as the debate progressed it didn’t take long for one to notice on whose side old Lester Holt was operating from.  And while I don’t think Trump suffered any significant harm, being the political rookie that he is, there were plenty of missed opportunities that he could have used to blunt Holt’s effort to allow Hitlery to escape completely unscathed.    

Holt had own his “Candy Crowley” moment, likely more than one if we’re being honest, at this the first debate of the 2016 presidential election on Monday night.  And it was more than a little obvious that he bowed under the pressure from Hitlery’s campaign and the liberal media by “fact-checking” Trump on the question of his support for the Iraq War.  Holt lived up to the expectations of his peers.  But he lived down to the worst expectations of conservatives, who routinely see Republican candidates treated unfairly by these leftist debate moderators.  When will we learn?

Again and again, Holt, the supposed unbiased journalist, asked Trump questions that were obviously taken straight from Hitlery’s campaign talking points, and which were obvious set-ups for Hitlery to attack (and for fact-checkers to pounce on whatever Trump asserted in his own defense).  In addition, the audience repeatedly interjected — almost always in Hitlery’s favor — and Holt didn’t bother to stop them, though it was against the rules. He only stopped the audience when there were cheers for Trump calling for Hitlery’s emails.  Take another bow, Lester. You did your job well.

Here are Lester’s five worst examples:

Tax returns. Holt never asked Hitlery about her e-mail scandal, about Benghazi, or about the Clinton Foundation and all of its rather dubious dealings. But he did ask Trump about his tax returns, arguing — not asking — that there might be questionable information in them that the American public deserved to hear.

Birther conspiracy theory. Holt never asked Hitlery about her past record of racist statements, including her “super-predator” remarks as First Lady, or her explicit appeal to “white Americans” in her 2008 primary campaign against Barry. Yet he asked Trump about the Birther conspiracy theory and cast it as racist.

Stop-and-frisk. After an exchange between the candidates over the policy of “stop-and-frisk,” Holt interjected to bolster Hitlery’s point by stating, erroneously, that stop-and-frisk had ended in New York because it had been declared unconstitutional by a court. Trump countered, correctly, that the new mayor had canceled the policy before the litigation was over.

“A presidential look.” Towards the end of the debate, Holt asked Trump about what he meant by saying Hitlery did not have “a presidential look.” He did so after noting that Hitlery had become “the first woman” to be nominated for president by a major political party, thus setting Trump up as a sexist. As Trump answered, Holt interrupted him, then gave Hitlery a chance to respond with her talking points about Trump’s past comments on women.

Iraq War. The question of whether Trump supported the Iraq War or not has been widely debated. What is beyond doubt is that Hitlery voted for it. Holt only represented one side of the debate about Trump, and never asked Hitlery about her own vote.

I’ll admit my expectations regarding Trump’s debate performance were pretty low.  There isn’t much call for debates in his current line of work.  And, I can honestly say I’ve never voted for someone based on their performance in a debate. I’ve made my mind up well before that.  I look at the fact that Trump is able to fill stadiums of 15,000 quite easily all the time while Hitlery struggles to fill a gymnasium with 200 people.  Trump could have let it rip on so many different issues, but he chose not to.  Perhaps he’ll bring up Bengazi, and so much more, next time.

And despite what we hear from the state-controlled media, Hitlery is far from being as pure as the wind driven snow.  She is without a doubt the most evil person I've ever seen in politics.  The Clinton Crime Machine is very much alive and well.  Come this November 8 the choice should be very clear, we will either choose Liberty or we will choose Communism.  It could not be clearer if you have watched what has happened to this country over the course of the last eight years.  You will get to decide how it is that you and your family will be able to live out the rest of your lives.

Those able to recognize the fact that our country is in big trouble must also recognize that at least with Trump as president we would have a chance to make things better, whereas with Hitlery we’d have absolutely no chance whatsoever.  Slick and Hitlery are two of the most corrupt people to have ever occupied the White House. There is absolutely nothing positive to say about either one of them.  These two are nothing more than a couple of grifters.  Hitlery has worked to shred our constitution and done all that she can to jeopardize our sovereignty as well as our national security.

And does anyone remember the Community Re-Investment Act (CRA)?  That Jimmy Carter nightmare made even worse by ‘Slick’?.  It was the Democrat scheme that forced banks to provide home loans to people they knew couldn't afford them. Bush tried shut it down but the Democrats wouldn't allow it. It was giving loans to people that couldn't afford them that created the bubble that inevitably burst.  Our government backed those crappy loans and ORDERED banks to make them or be penalized.  Would you ever loan money to someone you knew couldn't pay it back?

I think most sane people in this country, or anyone not a Democrat, are able to recognize the fact that we are rapidly approaching a very crucial of election.  And the issue to be decided is one that could determine what sort of future we create for generations yet to come: Will the American people decide that socialism is no longer something we wish to experiment with?  Or will they determine that it is working so well for us that we wish to take it even further?  It’s at this point in time that my confidence in the American people to make the right decision is pretty low.  

But that said, here are but a few facts to ponder as you consider who it is that you think would be the best person to be our next president.

1 - When Barry “Almighty” entered the White House, the U.S. government was $10.6 Trillion in debt. Today, the U.S. government is $19.5 Trillion in debt, and Barry still has several months to go until the end of his second term. That means that on average more than $1.1 Trillion will have been added to the national debt every year during his presidency.  Think about the tremendous amount of wealth that we are stealing from future generations and for what?  To make our economy appear much, much better than it would otherwise appear by systematically destroying our future in the process.

2 - As Barry prepares to leave office, the rate at which we are adding to the national debt is actually increasing.  During the fiscal year that is just ending, the U.S. government has added another $1.36 Trillion to the national debt.

3 - Barry “Almighty” is on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the U.S. economy grew by at least 3 percent.

4 - The percentage of Americans with a full-time job has been sitting at about 48 percent since 2010. You have to go back to 1983 to find a time when full-time employment in this country was so low.

5 - The labor force participation rate peaked back in 1997 and has been steadily falling ever since.  Today 95 Million Americans are out of the workforce.

6 - The “inactivity rate” for men in their prime working years is actually higher today than it was during the last recession.

7 - The United States has lost more than five million manufacturing jobs since the year 2000 even though our population has become much larger over that timeframe.

8 - If you can believe it, the total number of government employees now outnumbers the total number of manufacturing employees in the United States by almost 10 million.

9 - One study found that median incomes have fallen in more than 80 percent of the major metropolitan areas in this country since the year 2000.

10 - According to the Social Security Administration, 51 percent of all American workers make less than $30,000 a year.

11 - The rate of homeownership in the U.S. has fallen every single year that Barry “Almighty” has been in the White House.

12 - Approximately one out of every five young adults are currently living with their parents.

13 - In 1971, 61 percent of all Americans were considered to be “middle class”, but now middle class Americans have actually become a minority in this nation.

14 - One recent survey discovered that 62 percent of all Americans have less than $1,000 in savings.

15 - According to the Federal Reserve, 47 percent of all Americans could not even pay an unexpected $400 emergency room bill without borrowing the money from somewhere or selling something.

So there you have it.  And while it all seems pretty much cut and dried to me, oddly enough it would seem that far too many Americans can’t quite seem to figure things out.  Which, to tell you the truth, is more than a little scary.  If you are able to look around you and not be able to see just how bad things have gotten, and how much worse things would get if we were actually to elect Hitlery, then I’m afraid there’s simply no hope for you.  Think what you will of the man, but the only hope we have of being able to regain control of our country is to elect Donald Trump. 

HITLERY SEEKING ‘SPECIAL TREATMENT’ IN DEBATES AGAINST TRUMP…

For someone who is supposed to be not only the smartest women in the world but also someone for whom this election was deemed to be little more than a formality, those on her side seem to working very hard to tilt things even more in her favor.  As recently as this past weekend we heard from Hitlery’s campaign manager who seemed to imply that Hitlery apparently thinks it's moderator Lester Holt's job to do her job for her at this evening's first presidential debate.

Because rumor has it that Hitlery’s campaign has practically begged old Lester to do a little on scene "fact checking" of ‘The Donald’ during Monday's debate, even though historically that is the other debater's, not the moderator's, job.  During an interview with ABC's George ‘Stephy’ Stephanapolous, Hitlery’s campaign manager, Robbie Mook, explained why Hitlery ‘deserves’ even more special treatment from the state-controlled media than she has already managed to receive.

Mook said, "What we’re concerned about is that there might be some sort of double standard here."   And he went on to say, "You know, Donald Trump can’t lie on that debate stage and -- and win or even get a passing grade."  ‘Team Hitlery’ has been very worried about the public's expectations for the debate, which definitely place the onus on her, given her so-called years of "experience" and policy knowledge.  So I’m quite sure there will be a double standard, and in Hitlery’s favor.

And Stephy responded, "You guys have been pushing that pretty hard, this idea of a double standard, and saying it’s up to the moderator to point out falsehoods." And added, "But the debate commission has been pretty clear that they think it’s the job of the moderator basically to get out of the way and just ask the questions."  Now as we all know, Hitlery has always been of the opinion that such rules simply were not meant to apply to her only to her opponents. 

But like a dog with a bone, Mook wouldn't relent, saying "All that we’re asking is that, if Donald Trump lies, that it’s pointed out."  He then complained about how "unfair it is" for Hitlery to "play traffic cop while with Trump, make sure that his lies are corrected, and also to present her vision for what she wants to do for the American people."  To his credit, and surprisingly so, Stephy gave the perfect, most accurate response: "But isn’t that what a debater is supposed to do?"

To which Mook stammered and attempted to qualify Trump as being a "special case" because he allegedly lies a lot. Yes, we suppose Mook would know a thing or two about a candidate who lies a lot.  This is classic Hitlery strategy, accuse others of that which they are guilty a thousandfold.  I think we can all agree that when it comes to someone who “lies a lot”, and not just allegedly, there is absolutely no one who can hold a candle to Hitlery.  Except for maybe Barry “Almighty”.

Tilting the playing field is the only way Hitlery even has a chance.  Of course, they want this only because one of the major defining moments in 2012 was when Candy Crowley inserted herself into the debate to help Barry.  Of course if Romney hadn’t been such a wimp it likely wouldn’t have mattered as much as it did.  He could have easily turned it into being in his favor.  Be Romney folded like a cheap suit and it was one of the reasons he lost.  I don’t think Trump would fold.

But I supposed Crowley paid and, to some degree, may still pay a price for her obvious politically motivated decision, one which most everyone agrees was the wrong one.  But more importantly it demonstrates just how far the Democrats, and their media allies, will go in using any and every trick at their disposal, legal or not, in order to win an election since they can’t win with the same tired ideas that they have been pushing for years and many voters have continued to reject.  

What Trump will need to be prepared for, in all three debates, is the fact that they will all be moderated by Democrat hacks disguised as impartial moderators.  And attempts will be made to put him in the position of defending himself, whereas Hitlery will be made to face no such challenge.  That’s why he must do his homework and have an argument ready to defend any of his positions.  He must be wary of any such bias formed as a question such as, “Why do Republicans hate blacks?”

He must turn such questions around and talk about freeing blacks from the liberal plantation and preventing the Democrats from trying to keep them there.  Also, he should waste no time in pointing out questions that appear to come from either the DNC or Hitlery’s campaign.  And if necessary he can bring up the hacked DNC emails that show how the debate moderator has been influenced by the DNC.  And he can easily imply the moderator is little more than a Democrat Party hack.

If the moderator persists he, or she, should be properly admonished with it being made clear to the audience the level of bias that is taking place.  If the moderator takes offence, Trump can very simply point out the numerous times they have personally exhibited such bias or point out the fact that their network has essentially been on the Democrat Party payroll for years.  Trump should rephrase any question into the conservative perspective before proceeding to answer it.

So I’m ‘debating’ on whether or not I’m even going to watch the debate tonight.  I wish I felt confident in Trump being able to handle anything that might be thrown at him.  But I fear that once it becomes obvious that it’s a two against one scenario, things might start to unravel, and much to the delight of Hitlery.  He just needs to point out that it’s become two against one and move on.  But the $64,000 question is, will he be able to?  I guess in a matter of hours we’ll all know.

LIKE IT OR NOT, THE FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY RESTS ON DONALD TRUMP…

Does anyone other than myself remember how it was back in 2008 when so many on the left declared that the election of Barry “Almighty” in 2008 would help to usher in 40 years of Democrat rule.  But instead, it’s been during Barry’s tenure that Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 governorships, 69 House seats and 13 Senate seats.  And perhaps if the Republicans running for Congress and kept but a few of the many promises they made in their effort to get elected in 2010, 2012 and 2014, the numbers might be even worse for the Democrats.  And I can’t help but wonder had Barry not been elected and the proceeded to drag this country so drastically to the left, would Donald Trump now be in the position that we find him, on the verge of becoming our next president?

Barry’s recent warning in his final address to the United Nations, notwithstanding, about the many dangers of “crude populism,” populist sentiment is very much on the rise in America following what has been Barry’s rather disastrous eight years in office.  And, more importantly, it is what may actually end up being his enduring legacy.  American politics, as most of us I’m sure will agree, has long been manipulated by large corporations and wealthy individuals with incredible lobbying power.  Hitlery’s candidacy looks like a case of the elite within the Democrat Party simply deciding that it was now “Hillary’s turn”, an assessment confirmed by hacked emails which proved that the supposedly neutral Democrat National Convention favored her over her rival, Bernie Sanders.

There is no doubt that over the last eight years wealth has become concentrated in ever fewer hands, while the titans of Silicon Valley disrupt the old economy and the jobs it provided.  These are valid criticisms which have been picked up by Mr. Trump and turned into a formidable mixture along with immigration reform, rebuilding our military and saving the Supreme Court.  No one knows if Trump can win the presidency, but it becomes more of a distinct possibility each day.  But what is clear is that the Trump insurgency will leave its mark on politics in the US and around the world even if he loses.  As the economy becomes more globalized, politics is becoming more local, a process hastened by the rise of social media and the decline of the old media gatekeepers in newspapers and television.

And so it would seem that our Racial-Arsonist-in-Chief will not be at all happy to have the Rise of The Donald as being his "legacy".  Though Barry has done precious little else that has been worthwhile.  If Trump does win it will be due in large part to the actions of our Liar-in-Chief, so at least there will be some good to come from eight disastrous years of Barry's presidency.  But Trump must work to make good on what he has laid out during the campaign.  The bottom line here is that if Trump doesn’t win, we will no longer have a nation.  And if you missed Barry's rant at the United Nations, it can be summed up in pretty much one line. He wants one world totalitarian government, with Him as its Supreme Leader.  And the sad truth is is that Hitlery, Romney, and yes the Bushes too, are all in on it.

Barry has proven to be nothing if not the straw that broke the camel's back. I've always maintained that if Barry had continued the march toward globalism/socialism/ communism, or whatever you want to call it, a bit more slowly he would've likely gotten away with it.  It was his brazen attitude, speed, and audacity which slapped the sleeping people in their faces and woke many up from their slumber.  So thanks, Barry. The frog was made to jump out of the boiling pot because of you, and that's the only legacy you'll have.  But having said that, America would be in a much better position in the world had it not been for our pansy-ass, limp-wristed congressional Republicans.  Because they have done nothing to stop, or even slow, Barry, after promising they would do all that they could to stop him.

So now enter Donald Trump from stage right.  And after all of the disappointments that we have been forced to contend with because of all the many broken promises that have been made by so many of our supposed ‘conservative’ leaders, Trump, if he is fortunate enough to win come this November, will be called upon, by those who voted for him, to administer to those who, over the course of the last eight years, have allowed Barry to pretty much run roughshod over them, nothing short of a boot in the ass.  Because those of us who will be voting for Trump will be doing so for one reason and one reason only.  That being to reverse as much as possible, and as quickly as possible, all of what Barry has managed to do to our country.  If Trump does not win, then America as we know it, is done!  

OBAMA GLAD TO STAND WITH THOSE WHO HATE THIS COUNTRY…

Barry “Almighty”, our ‘Racist-in-Chief’, has now come out and officially dismissed the recent violence and destruction that we have taking place in Charlotte, North Carolina rioters in response to the shooting of an ‘armed’ black man by a black police officer.  Barry said, “The overwhelming majority of people who have been concerned about police-community relations [are] doing it the right way.”  And Barry went on to say, “Every once in a while you see folks doing it the wrong way.”  So how is that it was just every once and a while that folks did it the wrong way?  Was it when they broke store windows so they could loot so they could then loot those same stores?  Or, perhaps when they were throwing bricks and rocks at the police?  So tell us Barry, what was that these folk did what Barry called the “wrong way”? 

Barry made his rather idiotic, and dare I say incendiary, comments during an interview with Good Morning America’s Robin Roberts while at the brand new Smithsonian National Museum of Black History and Culture.  Barry argued that Americans need to recognize that there was a real problem in the justice system that the protestors in Charlotte were reacting to.  He said, “I think it’s important to separate out the pervasive sense of frustration among a lot of African Americans about shootings of people and the sense that justice is not always color blind.”  Now as far as I’m concerned the ONLY problem with our justice system is that many thugs who should be going to prison are, instead, allowed to walk free on our streets!  Many of whom Barry himself has let out of prison!

Barry then went on to suggest that the protestors would be more effective if they were peaceful.  Well gee Barry, NO SHIT!  He said, “The way we change the system requires to be able to reach out and engage the broader American community and that requires being peaceful, that requires being thoughtful about what are the specific reforms you’re looking for.”  However, Barry’s comments are markedly different than his condemnation of the damage caused by rioting protestors in Baltimore back in April.  Then he referred to the rioter as being “criminals and thugs who tore up the place.”  And it was during a White House press conference at the time that Barry said, “There’s no excuse for the kind of violence that we saw yesterday. It is counterproductive.” 

And it was at that same White House press conference that Barry went on to say, “When individuals get crowbars and start prying open doors to loot, they’re not protesting. They’re not making a statement. They’re stealing. When they burn down a building, they’re committing arson. And they’re destroying and undermining businesses and opportunities in their own communities. That robs jobs and opportunity from people in that area.”  So I guess I’m wondering what was different then differs from what we saw taking place in Charlotte that would have lead Barry to make his rather idiotic comment about how “every once in a while you see folks doing it the wrong way.”  Might have something to with the close proximity to a very important, even crucial, election?  No, that can’t be it.   

Barry’s idiotic conclusion is so far removed from reality as it make little more that pure nonsense.  And it is once again what our Racist-in-Chief has gone well beyond the spewing of his racist drivel that has absolutely no connection to what it is that we’ve all been witnessing each and every night on our televisions.  But, then, since when has Barry ever cared about telling us the truth?  Because everything he says is the outcome of the algorithm of election year politics.  Barry’s language has done little more than to provide to these home grown radical terrorist some level of cover for their violent outbursts and therefore furthering the ‘Black Lives Matter’, "hands up don't shoot" lie.  The bottom line here is that no matter what lie he tells at this point, Barry owns this.  This is his legacy.

Barry is our racist anti-American president, and since day one of his being in office he has set about to divide this country like never before. He is nothing more than a traitor to everything that makes America great.  Barry has put scores of blacks out of work and done much to keep them unemployed.  And he has done that through over-regulation, wasteful spending, illegal immigration, Obamacare and more.  Democrats obliterated the family unit in the black community, only adding to our social ills. Then he, Lynch and Hitlery work to assure them that their resulting frustrations are all the fault of whitey.  They can't be blamed for rioting at the drop of a hat.  Someday soon, I hope, we shall have a president who is not intent on destroying, aka “fundamentally transforming”, America, but on making “America Great Again!.”

But in order for us to have any hope of being able to make that happen there will first need to be enough American people who wish to finally prevent our country from continuing on down the path upon which Barry has placed us and which Hitlery not only wishes to keep us, but also wishes to accelerate our journey down.  A path that has only one possible destination, that being the certain destruction for our country.  And as I have said before we who wish to save our country are very rapidly running out of time, and we can no longer afford to sit on our hands as those whom we have elected continue to do as only they see fit.  And at this stage of the game our only hope lies in Donald Trump.  And while some may remain hesitant about, or even down opposed to, his candidacy, like it not he’s all we’ve got.  

CHARLOTTE, LIKE A BROKEN RECORD…

There they go again.  But then it’s some we’ve seen too much of, 24/7 ‘news’ coverage of rampaging Negroes as they go about destroying their own city, and because of what?   Well, that would be because another black male couldn’t bring himself to do something as basic as what he was told to do by the police.  And you have to wonder, what is it about blacks that makes them so adverse to authority?  And then others have the nerve to claim racism when something tragic happens that is entirely the fault of the individual who left police officers with no other alternative than to defend themselves.  It simply makes no sense to me.  

So I can only assume that the end game here if we’re using places like Ferguson, Missouri as well as Baltimore, Milwaukee, Baton Rouge and now Charlotte, North Carolina as our examples, it’s that blacks are now to be allowed to do whatever it is that they wish to do and that police should now focus all of their attention only on us white folks.  I mean, what other conclusion can anyone possibly come to?  Charlotte is but the most recent examples where rampaging blacks have essentially been permitted to run free, allowed to loot and destroy personal property at will with very few, if any, ever being arrested.

These new riots in Charlotte, which some have actually chosen to describe using the much more benign nomenclature of ‘protests’, resulted following Tuesday afternoon's fatal shooting of 43-year-old Keith Lamont Scott by a black police officer.  The city has a population of roughly 830,000 people and blacks make up about 35 percent of that population.  Now some folks may remember that the city managed to pull itself through a racially charged shooting three years ago without the unrest that had erupted in recent years in places such as Baltimore, Milwaukee and Ferguson, Missouri.

In 2013, Charlotte police charged one of their own, Randall Kerrick with voluntary manslaughter within days, after the white officer shot an unarmed black man who had been in a wreck and was looking for help.  And while the jury deadlocked and the charge was dropped last summer, the city saw only a few protests but no violence.   Sadly this time around it’s a much different story with many blacks simply being unable to control their inner thug.  Or perhaps they simply saw it as an opportunity to go on a ‘shopping’ spree, of sorts, to see just how much ‘free stuff’ they could ‘acquire’ for themselves with no fear of being arrested.

On Wednesday hundreds of rioters who were shouting "black lives matter" and "hands up, don't shoot". Authorities said three people and four police officers were injured, but those figures had not been updated early Thursday morning. The violence happened amid questions about what happened when Scott was shot and killed in the parking lot of his condominium complex.  Police did not release dashboard or body camera footage, but said Scott had a gun and refused several orders to drop his weapon.  And as is usually the case in such situations, Scott's family and neighbors said he had only been holding a book.

And in describing one version of the incident Taheshia Williams (obviously a black female), whose balcony overlooks the shady parking spot where Scott was Tuesday afternoon, said, "He got out of his car, he walked back to comply, and all his compliance did was get him murdered."  She said he often waited there for his son because a bicycle accident several years ago left him stuttering and susceptible to seizures if he stayed out in the hot sun too long.  So once again we’re to believe that some poor innocent black man, just minding his own bidness was simply gunned down by some trigger happy cop.  A black cop.

Distrust of the police continued after Wednesday's shooting of a protester.  Many demonstrators did not believe city officials' assertion that officers had not shot the protester.  "We protesting. Why the hell would we target each other?" Dino Davis said. "They say it was the tear gas, and it looked like one the tear gas exploded. But I think it was a rubber bullet because some of those rubber bullets can penetrate."  “We protesting?”  I guess that’s how these morons describe throwing bricks and rocks at police and looting and destroying the private property of those who played absolutely no part in the death of this black man, Mr. Scott. 

Police said the plainsclothes officer who shot Scott, identified as Brently Vinson, has been placed on leave, standard procedure in such cases. Three uniformed officers at the shooting scene had body cameras, but police said Vinson did not.  Calls for police to release the video have increased. North Carolina has a law that takes effect October 1 which requires a judge to approve releasing police video.  But the police department don't release videos when criminal investigations are ongoing.  But according to John Barnett, that video may be the only thing that calms Charlotte. Barnett runs a ‘civil rights’ group called ‘True Healing Under God’, or THUG.

And it was this guy, Barnett, who went on say, "Just telling us this is still under investigation is not good enough for the windows of the Wal-Mart."  Now how ignorant of a statement is that?  Such a statement makes pretty clear what this guy’s motive is for being on the scene.  I think we can all assume why he’s there and it sure isn’t to try to infuse any reason into this crowd of hate filled losers.  It’s people like this guy who are really nothing more than Al ‘Not So’ Sharpton wannabes.  Let’s face it, the fact that the name of his organization is ‘THUG’ pretty much tells me all I need to know about him. 

Charlotte-Mecklenburg police Chief Kerr Putney confirmed that investigators discovered a handgun at the scene, but not a book, according to the property sheet of items recovered at the scene.  It was during a press conference about the shooting on Wednesday morning that he said, “I can tell you a weapon was seized, a handgun. I can also tell you that we did not find a book.”  And according to Putney, Scott was spotted by law enforcement in a vehicle with a handgun. Officers ordered Scott to drop the weapon and exit the vehicle but he refused, exiting the vehicle armed with his handgun and ignoring orders to disarm.

Officer Vinson, a black police officer, shot Scott in response to the perceived threat and officers immediately gave him medical attention before medical teams arrived.  Putney urged the people of Charlotte to stand up for the facts of the investigation, and fight the alternative narrative that was being spread on social media after the shooting.  He said, “It’s time for the voiceless majority to stand up and be heard. It’s time to change the narrative.”  And added, “Because I can tell you from the facts that the story is a little bit different as to how it’s been portrayed so far, especially through social media.”  Few appeared to have been listening.

So what we’re really seeing in Charlotte is rioting, looting, vandalism, and assault and all for fun and profit with no real justification required.  Look at some of the video and you’ll see few who are genuinely angry, many are laughing and whooping it up, having a grand old time trashing their own neighborhood and committing felonies with impunity.  Need some new sneakers or a new flat screen?  Here’s your perfect opportunity.  These protesters are not protesting racial injustice by racist cops. They don't care if the man who shot him was Black or White.  And I doubt whether they even care if he had a book or a gun.

And "hands up don't shoot" didn't happen either, but the media isn't making amends for promoting that narrative and falsely accusing the police.  They promote these rioters by giving them press coverage and a voice without calling them out about the false narrative.  I watched some of the goings on last night on Fox News as their man on the street was giving these people entirely too much airtime to spew their nonsense.  I have to wonder just how long such idiocy would continue if those in the media would forgo, for the good of the country, their need for ratings and simply refuse to televise the antics of these animals.    

And I can’t help but wonder just how many young, innocent blacks were killed by other blacks in the city of Chicago during the same span of time that these malcontents have been allowed to rampage for the very simple reason that we have yet another black male who is now dead for no other reason than because he couldn’t bring himself to follow the orders of the police.  All this man had to do was to do what he was told to do.  Let’s face it, the most dangerous thing to a black man in America is another black man.  Police shootings of blacks is down, not up. 

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and trying to look for a different end result. How many times will it take before blacks in this country come to understand that when a law enforcer asks you to put your hands up and stand still that for your wellbeing as well as the officer, you DO IT!  It's the same scenario every single time. We all have choices to make in our life, and we alone are responsible to the outcomes, not anyone else. Police are trained to protect and serve. We are not!  That means even though we may not see what they see, it doesn't mean we are right and they are wrong.

All I see it, what we have here are the same people who insist upon being stupid enough to keep trying to take on the police and losing and then attempting to blame everyone but themselves. And I’m getting so tired of this crap. There have been great people come out of these very same cities because they were raised to be respectful and appreciative individuals who knew your actions and words determine where it is that you will end up in life.  As I watch coverage of these riots I don't see that, all I see are a bunch of whiny brats with their hands out or wanting to take from others without putting any effort to help themselves or others.

AMERICA’S FIRST ANTI-AMERICAN PRESIDENT, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA…

It was just yesterday, in what was his final speech to the United Nations, at least as president of these United States, that Barry “Almighty” set about to do his best to defend the increased globalization of the world’s nations, condemning the wave of populist nationalism that now seems to be growing in parts of the world in response.  Barry declared that globalization will continue to grow, and rapidly, signaling the unstoppable march of what he referred to as ‘progress.’  But he warned that nations who allow the wealthy to enjoy the benefits of globalism face challenges from their populace.  Those people, he noted, were falling prey to an “alternative” narrative, propagated to fuel opposition.  I’m assuming that it was as this point he might have been talking about folks like Donald Trump.

Barry said, “Alternative visions of the world have pressed forward, both in the wealthiest countries and in the poorest.”  And he went on to say, “Religious fundamentalism. The politics of ethnicity or tribe or sect. Aggressive nationalism. A crude populism. Sometimes from the far left but more often from the far right.”  He referred to a “collision of cultures” that was challenging each country and called for world citizens to reject religious fundamentalism and racism.  And it was in alluding to France’s burkini laws and Muslim clashes with France’s offensive cartoons that Barry said, “That’s a truism. That global integration has led to a clash of cultures. Trade, migration, the internet, all these things can challenge and unsettle our most cherished identities.”

Barry also took it upon himself to urge each country to evolve towards ‘progress’, describing the conflicts as part of the old world.  He said, “The world is too small. We are too packed together for us to be able to resort to those old ways of thinking.”  And Barry alluded to Donald Trump’s campaign promise to build a wall on the Southern border three times, pointing out that such an action would be futile to stop many of the threats facing the world.  Barry said, “Today, a nation ringed by walls would only imprison itself.”  And added, “The world is too small for us to simply be able to build a wall and prevent it from affecting our own societies.”  And in what I guess was a rather weak attempt at humor, Barry added, referring to the Zika virus, “Mosquitoes don’t respect walls.”

He concluded his speech with an examination of fallen human nature, pointing to the challenges that humanity faced.  He said, “Time and again human beings have believed they finally arrived at a period of enlightenment only to repeat cycles of conflict and suffering.”  And added, “Perhaps that’s our fate.”  But he explained that young educated people gave him hope and optimism about the future, as they could shed old social and cultural norms to fight for progress.  And, of course, he cited his own multi-racial and multicultural background as proof that the world could improve.  He said, “My own family is made up of the flesh and blood and traditions and cultures and face from a lot of different parts of the world, just as America’s been built by immigrants from every shore.”

Rather than oppose immigrants and refugees, Barry said, it was important for leaders to help everybody in the world with their problems.  He said, “This is what I believe that all of us can be co-workers with God, and our leadership and our governments and this United Nations should reflect this irreducible truth.”  That’s all well and good, however Barry, in his typical arrogant fashion, seems to put forth the notion that there is but one way to help those in need and that no responsibility whatsoever is owed to those whose country it is that these thousands, even hundreds of thousands, of immigrants and refugees are being allowed to invade.  Those seeking refuge here can, and should, be provided with a safe haven within the borders of their own country.

So my own analysis of Barry’s speech is that, personally, I saw it as being nothing more than another steaming pile of Traitorous Globalist Blather.  This man has been a repugnant and malignant force for the culturally, militarily, economically and socially de-constructing of our country since he first sauntered into the Oval Office.  The UN and EU are becoming identical in both their objectives and goals. They would see a world without borders, flooded with Islam, with all power being given to the elites.  Trump needs to pull us out of the UN and shut down all payments to this global organization of hate.  One of the top priorities of a Trump administration must be to cripple the UN by stopping all US funding, exiting the UN, and kicking it from America's soil, as it’s nothing but a cesspool of Leftists and jihadists.

Barry once again demonstrated how it is that he is so completely and utterly out of touch with both the American and the British patriot. Bitching about "populism" -- the new dirty word of liberal globalists -- is simple whining about "Patriotism".  Liberals can't bring themselves to use the right P-word in their griping.  Globalization must not be allowed to grow.  This is the path forged by Trump, and followed by Brexit.  American patriots WILL take this country back, political correctness must be rejected as must the leftist policies centered on legal and illegal immigration being used as tools of vote-pandering.  Hitlery is the embodiment of Barry's ineptitude, incompetence, and failure.  It is my fervent hope that she will be crushed in the upcoming election, and it will be a beautiful thing to behold.

It’s rather fitting that Barry would spew such drivel while standing before such a gathering of UN scum and behind an emblem of world government and leftist fascism. He's never behaved as our president.  He's always been more of a spokesmoron for the world elite, and an advocate for the Islamization of the West and the decline of Western society.  Barry is the true enemy of freedom loving people everywhere.  If Barry was intentionally trying to destroy our country he could not be doing a better job than he has already done.  And now there are millions of Americans who seem more than willing to elect Hitlery to finish the job that he started.  The Democrats, with Barry leading the charge, have created a basic five step plan to destroy this country which Barry seeks to hand over to Hitlery.

And it is that Democrat 5 Step plan that follows:

1) Bring in millions of anti-American immigrants who have absolutely no intention of assimilating. And ignore the fact that some intend to incite political and racial violence against legal citizens, while still others intend to perpetrate violence in the name of a medieval cult.

2) Throw in crushing national debt exacerbated by economy crushing regulations and what has been nothing short of a reckless fiscal policy.  Give billions of dollars to our enemies, and even establish a precedent for paying ransom to our worst enemies in exchange for American hostages. 

3) Racially incite violence and stir up all manner of racial tension at every opportunity, never miss the chance to blame the race, religion, nationality, or culture of the white, conservative Christian, while, at the same time, condescendingly defending every other group of people, even those who have repeatedly shown themselves to hate the rest of us and want to cause us harm.

4) Go about the bulldozing of the Legislative and Judiciary branches of government while choosing to simply ignore any and all checks and balances put in place by our Constitution.  And then arrogantly refer to any form of descent as being obstruction, any sort of disagreement as bigotry, and proceed to pass all manner of executive orders for everything imaginable and justify such action by telling the country that we must act now.  And do everything possible to ensure that the leftist agenda is made to move forward at any cost, claiming that to so otherwise would be to risk disaster. 

5) Give lip service to the long honored traditions of our country, our flag, our military, our veterans, while out of the other side of your mouth you spew hate for everything our ancestors fought and died for to preserve our great nation. 

Since day one of his presidency Barry has sought nothing more than to invent ever more effective methods for destroying our country.  And it’s in the process of having done so that he has proven himself to be nothing less than a traitor to America.  After all, a country that is toppled by its enemies can rise again, but one which crumbles from within, that one is dead forever.  And it is exactly that which Barry seeks to accomplish, and if unable to complete the task in his allotted time then he will do all that he can to ensure that he will be able to hand things off to Hitlery so that she can then go on to finish the primary task at hand.  And then once America has been effectively neutralized there will nothing left to stand in the way of the globalists.  And then surely darkness will descend upon us all.  

OBAMA WORRIED ABOUT HIS ‘LEGACY’ GOING UP IN SMOKE…

It would appear that at an event this past weekend, Barry “Amighty”, our ‘Dear Beloved Leader, threw what can only be described as being a hissy-fit as he expressed some level of concern about his ‘legacy’ being in danger.  You see, at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Saturday night, it was a somewhat enraged Barry who screamed and pointed at his audience, telling them to get out and vote for Hitlery, or risk tarnishing his hard fought for legacy.  Barry literally shouted at those in attendance, “I will consider it a personal insult -- an insult to my legacy -- if this community lets down its guard and fails to activate itself in this election."   And then in using much the same tone as when he told blacks back in 2012 to vote for revenge, Barry went on to say, "You want to give me a good sendoff? Go vote."

Barry declared that even though he isn't running for president again, a vote for Hitlery would essentially mean the same thing.  He said, "If you care about our legacy, realize everything we stand for is at stake. All the progress we’ve made is at stake in this election. My name may not be on the ballot, but our progress is on the ballot.  Barry continued saying, "Tolerance is on the ballot. Democracy is on the ballot. Justice is on the ballot. Good schools are on the ballot. Ending mass incarceration, that's on the ballot right now! And there is one candidate who will advance those things. And there is another candidate whose defining principle -- the central theme -- of his candidacy is opposition to all that we've done."  But what’s also on the ballot is rebuilding our economy, rebuilding our military and making America great again!

Barry’s fiery command also noted "the historic turnout of 2008 and 2012 especially in the African-American community", and he went on to plead to his audience that every vote matters.  Barry said his priority for the next seven weeks before the election is getting every vote he can for Hitlery.  Obviously ensuring his legacy is of higher priority than being president.  And it was apparently for added effect that Barry said, "Hope is on the ballot and fear is on the ballot, too.”  Odd that Barry, who was once so vehemently opposed to Hitlery becoming president, now seems to be the face of her faltering campaign.  What a strange turn of events that now seems to be manifesting right before our eyes.  It shows just how desperate Barry is to save his ‘legacy’ of “fundamental transformation.”

Look, I think most Americans, including many black Americans, at least if they’re being honest with themselves, would agree that Barry has made things considerably worse for all Americans.  And while I mean no offense, it’s Barry’s fellow blacks who must assume some of the blame for voting this cretin into office in the first place.  But I suppose most did so because they thought he truly was the shining star and would give them everything they wanted.  What they fail to realize is that whatever the government "gives" you can also be taken from you by that very same government.  No doubt Barry will live high on the hog once he leaves office, he doesn't have to live under the policies he put in place. But the rest of us do, so for all those who voted for him, I’d just like to say thanks, thanks a lot!

It almost makes we want to walk up to every black person I meet and say, “Have you enough yet?  No?  Then go out and vote democrat again, you dummy, since the last eight years have been just oh so good for you.”  But nah, it wouldn’t matter, I’d just be wasting my breath.  They’ll keep voting for Democrats because it’s what they do.  I suppose you could even say it’s in their DNA to vote Democrat!  And let’s not forget that it was Democrat LBJ who declared that he’d have blacks voting Democrat for the next 200 years.  And since it’s only been 50 years since he made that declaration, there’s still about 150 more years left to go.  And I see very little evidence that blacks are in any hurry to prove him wrong.  It would seem that no matter how bad things get, it still not bad enough to keep them from voting for Democrats. 

Let’s face it, can anyone think of just one thing Barry has done that has resulted in improving the life of those in the black community?  Because, I’ll tell ya, try as I might I can’t come up with a single one.  Meanwhile, Barry’s speeches are nothing more than political rope-a’-dope, or something he calls, okie-doke.  I think most will agree that Barry is without a doubt, the worst president in the history of this country, surpassed only by that icon of the Democrat Party, FDR.  Roosevelt forever changed the federal government’s scope and size, almost entirely for the worse.  Democrats love to reminisce about how it was that Roosevelt successfully navigated this country out of the ‘Great Depression’.  But what they fail to mention is that his policies only made things worse and it was only because of WW II that the depression ended. 

And lest anyone forget, the role the state-controlled media has played, and continues to play, in this ongoing political tragedy, has been significant.  They did little to vet this guy, in fact they went so far as to make him appear as being some brilliant Ivy-League trained Constitutional scholar, which could not have been further from the truth.  One of Barry’s favorite professors in college was some guy by the name of Roger Boesche, his Marxist political science professor.  And as a young community agitator in Chicago one of Barry best buds was "professor" Bill Ayers.  And what these two had in common was their hatred of capitalism, and blaming the ills of the country on capitalism and racism.  But that’s just the tip of the iceberg and yet he state-controlled media never bothered to research Barry’s questionable background.

And now after having been made to suffer through eight long, and very arduous, years of what has to be considered one of the worst periods this country has ever been made to experience, economically, socially as well as internationally, we are now being faced with that most horrific of prospects, a Hitlery Clinton presidency.  I can’t help but wonder how it is that anyone can look back at the last eight years and still be of the opinion that this country would be able, in any way, to survive another four, or God forbid eight, years of the same sort of leftist policies that have wreaked all manner of havoc upon our economy, decimated our military and severely reduced our standing in the world.  Because there’s simply no way.  Enough of the American people must come to their senses just long enough to defeat Hitlery Clinton.