.

.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

OBAMA, THE GREATEST THREAT WE FACE FROM WITHIN…


And so it was then that, yesterday afternoon, we again were witness to Barry “Almighty” behaving at his very un-presidential best as he yet again went on the attack against the wrong enemy.  Barry proceeded to lash out against Donald Trump, and his many other critics, who complain that the fight against the Islamic State and radical extremist terrorism simply isn't being taken seriously enough because of Barry’s stubborn refusal to properly identify an enemy that has so very clearly demonstrated its determination to kill as many Americans as it can. 

During an address about the recent Orlando terrorist attack and the continuing threat of terrorism overall, Barry complained, "We cannot beat ISIL unless we call them 'radical Islam?'"  He went on to say, "What exactly using this label would accomplish and what will it change? Will it make ISIL less committed to try to kill Americans? Would it bring more allies for military strategy than it is served by this?"  The answer, he said, is "none of the above."  Barry said, "Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away."  No, but it makes clear that you take the threat seriously!

And then Barry went on to say, "This is a political distraction. Before I was president, I have been cleared about how extremist group justifying terrorists. As president, I have called on our Muslim friends and allies at home and around the world to work with us to reject this twisted interpretation of one of the world's great religions.”  He said, "There is not a moment where we have not able to pursue a strategy because we didn't use the label "radical Islam.'"  Now, how is it that Barry can pursue a strategy when no real strategy would appear to even exist?  Is it me?

And not once has an adviser told him that if he uses the phrase would it turn the battles around, he added.  Right, and which one of his many stellar advisers is it that might actually tell him that?  Barry said, "So someone seriously thinks that we don't know who we are fighting."  And he added, "If there is anyone out there who thinks we are confused about who our enemies are, that would come to a surprise of the thousands of terrorists we have taken on our battlefield?"  No, I don’t think there’s any confusion on Barry’s part, he simply refuses to identify who the enemy really is!

Barry peppered his speech with references to Trump, without using his name. Trump has hammered Barry frequently for his stubborn refusal to use the "radical Islam" term.  Barry said that The United States has to make it harder for people who want to kill Americans to get their hands on the weapons of war that allow innocent people to be slaughtered, such as what happened early Sunday morning at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando.  Weapons of war?  Now that’s simply proof that Barry continues to see the right of Americans to keep and bear arms as being the bigger threat.

Barry said, "We cannot prevent every tragedy."  And then proceeded to revert to what has become the common theme heard from Democrats when he said, "We know that consistent with the Second Amendment. There are common sense steps that could reduce gun violence and the lethality of somebody intense to do somebody harm."  So, I guess, it just makes more sense to make even more people vulnerable to such attacks.  Imagine if there had been just one individual in that club in legal possession of a gun, how differently might things have turned out?  How many lives might have been saved?

Barry claimed that it's not enough to just talk about being tough on terrorists, but the nation also needs to "stop making it as easy as possible for terrorists to buy assault weapons.  Reinstate this weapons ban and make it harder for terrorists to use these weapons to kill us."  For one thing, the weapon used WAS NOT an assault weapon.  And what Barry is banking on here is the fact that very few people will bother to take the time to check out why it was that the ‘ban on assault weapons’ was allowed to expire.  It was because it had no effect.  It’s was, like now, nothing but pure politics.

Meanwhile, Hitlery Clinton, speaking to supporters in Pittsburgh, said that Trump's proposal bolstered her case that he is essentially temperamentally unfit to serve as president.  And I thought it pretty hilarious, especially after watching how Barry has approached the job for the last 7+ years, when Hitlery said Commander-in-chief "is a job that demands a calm, collected and dignified response" to events like the Orlando massacre early on Sunday.  That’s not exactly how I would describe how Barry has responded to such events.  But then, I’m not a limp-wristed Democrat.

Hitlery also noted that Trump seemed to suggest on Monday in a television interview that Barry might have somehow been responsible for the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history, a point that Trump said he did not make.  She said, "I have to ask: Will responsible Republican leaders stand up to their presumptive nominee or will they stand by his accusation about our president?"  While we can’t say that Barry was in any way directly responsible, what we can say, and should say, is that his actions and words have most certainly continued to encourage such violence!

So let’s see, the F.B.I. doesn't have the resources to stop terrorists, and at the same time it’s seen as a bad idea to allow the general population to arm themselves?  And then, calling Muslims who literally despise the United States what they are will not accomplish anything?  Maybe when the Muslims become "bitter clingers", Barry will be better able to bring himself to do what is supposed to be his most important job: to protect America and her citizens.  But then, if there is one thing that Barry has made quite clear it that he has virtually no interest in doing so.

An additional point that I think worth mentioning, is that while the FBI may not have had enough information to arrest this shooter after investigating and even interrogating him on three separate occasions over the last three years, but they certainly had enough to flag him should he apply for a purchase of a firearm.  So why was the "ok to sell" given when he went to buy the guns?  I suspect that it was because of his religious declaration as a Muslim and this administration's position that no one who declares the Islamic faith shall be in any way deprived of any rights, including that of buying a weapon.

No, Barry it will not alter the ‘terrorist’s war’ on the West, but what it will do, is to go some distance in convincing the American people that you are on OUR SIDE.  And by OUR SIDE, I mean the RIGHT SIDE. The side of righteousness and of life and liberty.  Those, Mr. President, whom it is your primary job to protect and to keep safe to the greatest extent possible.  For once, Mr. President, think of someone other than yourself, think about America and what’s best for her and her citizens when it comes to combating those who wish nothing more than to kill Americans.

While Barry’s logic here appears to be rather odd to me, to say the least, it certainly comes as no surprise. If not using a certain name doesn't change anything (implying a lack of importance), then why work so hard to not use it?  Why not say it and be done with it?  Call it what it is. This whole speech demonstrates the very opposite of the point he pretends to make.  Clearly there is a great deal of weight to the phrase "Islamic terrorist" or Barry wouldn't be as determined as he is not to use it.  Barry’s constant reply is when he asks, “What would that accomplish? “

And another thing, it might finally start making people in America at least begin to think that he’s doing actually everything that he can to protect the American people instead of busying yourself raising money for a very corrupt Democrat Party or taking extended, and rather costly, vacations for him and his family on the American people’s dime.  Also, it may also convince those of us who have come to believe that he’s more than just a little incompetent and derelict in his duties as president, that maybe he’s not quite as fucked up as we think.  Either way, it’s up to him.

We really do need, as president, someone who’s going to do more than pussyfoot around the topic of Islam and finally put the safety of the American people on the top of his ’To Do’ list.  Our desire to remain politically correct is killing us, literally.  In choosing to side with a violent religious cult responsible the death of millions of people over the last 1400 years instead of with American people would seem to indicate that Barry is either a fool or a member of the cult.  And apparently the same can be said of the Democrat candidate now vying for his job.  America needs to be careful this November, very careful.

No comments:

Post a Comment