‘CRAZY MAZIE’ HIRONO, WHAT TRUE STUPIDITY LOOKS LIKE UP CLOSE…

You know, it was once upon a time, and really not all that long ago, that I thought Shelia Jackson Lee and ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters had to be the dumbest things on two legs ever to be elected to the U.S. Congress.  But then I suppose it had to be only a matter of time before even they would be shown to be mere runners-up, or second stringers of a sort, and that someone would come along to surpass even these imbeciles, and in rather spectacular fashion.  And of course it is ‘Crazy Mazie’ Hirono from the great state of Hawaii who did just that, and who has now come to show to both Jackson and Waters what true stupidity really looks like both up close and personal.

And she did so, just this past Wednesday, when she expressed how she is quite sure that members of White House, under President Trump’s administration, do little more than to sit around in the Oval Office brainstorming on all manner of new and better ways to harm illegal immigrants.  It was during a recent appearance with MSNBC dolt, Chris Hayes, that ‘Crazy Mazie’ said, “I think that the Trump Administration people sit around every single day thinking of new ways to be cruel to these migrants.”  And she went on to say, “That’s what they do and tomorrow they will probably come up with something else.”  Yup, by golly, hapless boob has got it all figured out.

‘Crazy Mazie’s’ remarks were in response to questioning regarding the conditions of the nation’s largest family immigrant detention center, which is located in Dilley, Texas.  She had visited the facility back in December 2018, which she claimed at the time was “disturbing.”  She said, “These families should not be detained and that’s the bottom line, and so we’re now contemplating thousands and thousands of migrant families being detained, doing irreparable harm to little children.” And she added, “When I was in Dilley, we can’t forget seeing in one of the areas a little boy just silently crying. Heaven knows what’s going through his mind but, not good.”

And of course she continued by saying, “Clearly, [the detained children] are harmed irreparably.”  And then went on to say, “And our country should not be imposing this kind of cruelty on children.”  So while she witnessed all manner of cruelty there at the border, she is yet another Democrat who remains unconcerned regarding the “irreparable harm” that continues to be inflicted upon the unborn in this country.  She apparently has no issue with that.  Which, at least to my way of thinking, would make her out to be a far more depraved individual than Donald Trump has ever even thought of being.  But then she is a Democrat, so being depraved is to be expected.

Anyway, it was actually back during the administration of Barry ‘O’ that the federal courts ruled that the government is prohibited from detaining children for longer than 20 days. Since the 20-day window is generally nowhere near long enough to process the detained immigrants, children and their accompanying adults are consequently separated as not to violate what is referred to as the 1997 Flores Settlement Agreement.   Democrat lawmakers, such as ‘Crazy Mazie’ and members of the ‘fake news’ media have harshly criticized the Trump administration for continuing the family separation policy that started under ex-president Barry ‘O’.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently revealed that it will be using a new work around, of sorts, for the Flores agreement as a way to address the worsening immigration crisis at the southern border.  DHS introduced a new policy where family units will be kept together in “family residential centers” during immigration court proceedings.  The residential centers will be structured in a “campus-like” environment with classrooms for minors and areas where adults can meet with their attorneys.  Thus it allows families to stay together during immigration proceedings and has conditions appropriate for the care of children.

But of course, ‘Crazy Mazie’ was quick to rebuff the plan as just another way to detain poor immigrant children indefinitely.  She said, “We already know from so many child specialists that detaining children in these kinds of facilities does irreparable damage to them. There are alternatives to family detention that this administration could care less about.”  Before then going on to say, “The only way they can get around the Flores consent agreement is by getting around it.”  And she added, “They want to detain families indefinitely, children indefinitely, held in situations that do them absolutely no good when there are alternatives.”

If she were being honest (like that’s going to happen) it’s Democrats like ‘Crazy Mazie’ who actually while away the many hours of each and every day dreaming up ever more inventive, and more costly, ways to be cruel to law-abiding American citizens.  She's a hater, as are all Democrats.  And racist as well.  Democrats are the ones who choose to favor those here illegally over those who have either been born here or migrated here legally. Remember, it was Alexandria Occasional Cortez, another braindead Democrat, who actually said that those here illegally are more American than are the border agents enforcing our laws and defending our border.

And let’s get something else straight, it’s not our country imposing some perceived cruelty on any of these children, it’s their very own parents who have decided to subject them to the harsh reality of what can happen when one breaks our laws. Quit acting like illegal immigrants are innocent, they’re GUILTY!  No one forced them to come here, they came here of their own free will with the specific intent of breaking our laws. If they are seeking asylum then go to a port of entry. If they want into America then follow the process as it has been designed, apply for the proper paperwork and wait just like everyone else.  ‘Crazy’ doesn't have a clue.

Perhaps I’m letting my imagination run away with itself, but I think the only true thing any Democrat has ever said was awhile back when they kept calling all of this a “manufactured crisis.”  Except they forgot to mention that it was they who were doing the manufacturing.  All of a sudden, there's tons of people trying to game the asylum system who clearly don't qualify, resulting in our system being forced to handle many times over the numbers that it was designed to handle.  Democrats do all that they can to encourage people to come here in order to create what they hope will be a no win situation for President Trump.  You see, it’s ALL about politics.

You know, it’s a pretty sad commentary in 2019 America, the third most populous nation in the world, that a major political party supported by half of the electorate can only win an election by polarizing the other half and by making the opposition the personification of evil itself.  And it doesn't look like things are going to be improving any time soon.  While I understand that we have always had politicians demonizing opponents at election time, what we didn't seem to have is the non-stop and out-in-the-open undermining, plotting and scheming from election night forward by every ‘fake news’ outlet who has come to see their job as being to lead the opposition.

And finally, I’m having an extremely difficult time understanding how it came to be that this moron is the best the good people of Hawaii could come up with to be one of their two members of the U.S. Senate.  Yet, we are, after all, talking about an island, and likely an island where I’m quite certain, during brief periods in its history, some level of inbreeding might have actually occurred.  Now while I am in no way claiming that ‘Crazy Mazie’ could be a product of said inbreeding, it would certainly go a very long way in explaining just how she came to be so freaking stupid.  But then, maybe that has nothing to do with it at all.  Maybe she really is just that STUPID!!!

THOSE HERE ILLEGALLY HAVE NOT ‘EARNED’ THE RIGHT TO STAY HERE!!!

Democrats seem to be expending a great deal of both time and energy in their continuing effort to convince the American people that we somehow owe it to the world to take in all of their poor, sick and persecuted, and to then take care of them by providing to them FREE healthcare, education and housing . And Democrats are also demanding that we taxpayers stop whining about having to pick up the tab, no matter what that tab may eventually come to be.  Personally, I don’t feel we owe anything to those whose first action was to break our laws by crossing our border without our permission!  They are criminals from the very beginning!

But apparently there are those in the Democrat Party who say that Americans “have an obligation” to provide amnesty to what could be potentially millions of foreign nationals living in the United States who they claim have “earned the right” to be in the country.  ‘The right?’  So, apparently, after House Democrats with seven House RINOs passed an expansive amnesty to any illegal alien claiming to have arrived in the U.S. as a child, we now have several Senate Democrats who are demanding that the Senate do the same.  Democrats Dianne Feinstein, Chris Van Hollen, Ben Cardin, and ‘Little Timmy’ Kaine are now urging the Senate to pass their own amnesty plan.

And the plan this group of America-hating leftists have now come up with is one that would give nearly half a million foreign nationals living in the U.S. on Temporary Protected Status (TPS) a pathway to American citizenship.  And it was Cardin who said in a statement that: “These individuals have lawfully lived and worked in the U.S. as our neighbors, as they sought refuge in the U.S. We have an obligation to take action and give needed predictability and safety to people who are in an uncertain status. We need to stand up for the American values of compassion and diversity that have made this country stronger.”  I love it when Democrats speak of ‘American values.’

Meanwhile, it was Feinstein who said that the 440,000 foreign nationals who would receive the amnesty have “earned the right” to permanently stay in the U.S.  It was this old hag who had said, “The Senate needs to follow the House’s lead and pass these important protections for immigrant families who have been living and working in the United States for decades.”  And then she went on to say, “After fleeing wars and natural disasters, these families have established deep roots in our communities and earned the right to remain together here in the United States.”  Perhaps these same people should instead expend the necessary energy to FIX their own country?

And the Democrats, and more than a few Republicans, seem quite willing to continue to ignore completely is the fact that every year the U.S. admits more than 1.2 million, mostly low-skilled, legal immigrants who compete in the labor market for jobs against poor, working, and middle-class Americans.  About 70 percent of legal immigrants enter through the process known as “chain migration,” where newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives into the country with them.  Chain migration, alone, has brought about 10 million foreign nationals to the U.S. since 2005.  And that is nothing short of insane!

Actually, what Americans have an obligation to do is to protect our Constitution, our culture and our traditions.  Every foreigner who is identified as being in this country illegally should be summarily deported, and never again allowed to return. Applications for asylum or any other status that could allow foreigners to remain in the country, should only be accepted from those applying through an embassy, or consulate outside the country. Immigration should be limited to small numbers so as not to pose an economic threat to Americans.  Immigrants must learn English, and must be willing to assimilate.  If they do not wish to do so, they must go back home.

Although it would seem that those within the Democrat Party feel otherwise, America simply cannot afford to become the haven for the world's poor, oppressed and persecuted.  And for the very simple reason that there are, quite literally, billions of them, and the more we accept, the more we will become exactly like those places that these people are so desperate to escape.  Now I’m not sure about anyone else, but I’m in no hurry to live in a third world country.  These people are simply going to have to find ways to improve conditions in their own countries.  Allowing them to come to America in large numbers will only bring it down to the third-world level. 

And to be perfectly blunt here, what those seeking illegal entry into my country have truly “earned the right” to do, is to be arrested and to then be deported, at our earliest possible convenience, for violating U.S. Immigration laws.  And that’s ALL they that have earned the right to do.  NO foreign national has any sort of a right to enter this country illegally, or has earned the right to live here illegally or to work here illegally.  And sadly, it seems apparent that we now have far too many morons serving in Congress who seem to care far more about these criminals from foreign countries than they do about those whom they are SUPPOSED to be representing.   

And dare I say that none of us pay taxes just so trespassing foreigners are able come here and then be the recipients of all manner of ‘free’ stuff that we end up being forced to pay for.  Imagine if every dime of support for trespassing foreigners was to come to a stop.  There would then be more money that could then be spent on such things as infrastructure, or even a great American impermeable border WALL.  I think we all know why it is that these Democrats are unwilling to do anything that would stem the tide of illegals flooding across our border.  It’s really all about nothing more than the Democrats wanting to create for themselves more Democrat voters.

These members of Congress continue to stubbornly refuse to do their job while apparently expecting the citizens of this country to go along with this sort of nonsense.  I have a news flash, who we see as having any sort of an obligation are these same Democrats who we see as having the obligation to stop obstructing everything that our president is trying to do to fix what is a very real crisis at the border.  They need to do their job, uphold the existing real laws and to follow the Constitution.  They should avoid attempts to place obligations and duties upon the people of this country while they get paid, and very well, for doing nothing. 

Compassion has its place, but so does the rule of law, and the rule of law should trump compassion every time.  NO ONE is deserving of simply being given citizenship to this great country, it must be earned.  And to start out by breaking our laws, is not really starting out on the right foot.  Citizenship is not something to be taken lightly, and it should have a profound meaning in this country. Giving it away like candy as the Democrats wish will destroy our nation as we know it. I accept the fact that many of these people didn't have a say in the choices their parents made, but that’s not my fault, and I feel I have no obligation to allow them to stay any longer than they have.  

The time has now come for the American people to wake up.  Because if these traitorous politicians who now wield the power in our nation succeed, then the United States will eventually simply cease to exist.  When enough people do not share ‘traditional’ American values but instead share those ‘values’ embraced by the Democrat Party, regarding what the proper role of government should be, and what God given rights (as found in the U.S. Constitution) we the people possess, they will win. History is filled with examples of tribe conquering tribe and nation conquering nation, and mark my words the United States is not immune to such a thing.  

PELOSI: THE DEMOCRATS HAVE NEVER SAID WE DON’T HAVE A CRISIS AT THE BORDER…

I can only assume that Nancy Pelosi must think that ALL Americans are as stupid as those who continue to vote for Democrats.  But here’s a news flash, Nancy, we’re not.  So when she makes the idiotic claim that she and her fellow Democrats have never, not even once, argued that we do not have a crisis at our southern border it’s no one but the most brain dead among us who believe her.  Because it’s been on more than one occasion that she and many of her fellow Democrats have done exactly that.

It was earlier this week during her weekly press conference that Pelosi actually claimed that Democrats have “never not” called the situation at our southern border a crisis, this despite the fact that they repeated did just that earlier this year.  She said, “Well, let me just say this. We have never not said that there was a crisis — there is a humanitarian crisis at the border, and some of it provoked by the actions taken by the administration.”  Right, everything is provoked by President Trump.

And then in what was an apparent reference to the multibillion-dollar disaster aid bill being developed in Congress that Pelosi said, “What is happening at the border is tragic and we hope to address some of that in the disaster supplemental.” Before then going to say, “And we understand our responsibility to secure our border.”  The Democrat have shown time and again that not only do they not understand the need to secure our southern border, but have absolutely NO interest in doing do!

Pelosi’s rather disingenuous, if not totally dishonest, answer came after a member of the ‘press’ asked how Democrats currently view the situation at the southern border, after calling it a “manufactured crisis” for months.  Despite her claim to the contrary, Pelosi along with a rather significant number of other Democrats have gone on record in the recent past in their effort to flat out deny that there is in any way a crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border.  And to claim that there is, is nothing short of racist. 

And it was in a joint statement from Pelosi and Chuckie Schumer back in February that read: “The President’s unlawful declaration over a crisis that does not exist does great violence to our Constitution and makes America less safe, stealing from urgently needed defense funds for the security of our military and our nation.”  The purpose of this pathetic little joint diatribe issued by these two losers, was to simply attack President Trump for having declared a national emergency at the border.

And then it was Steny ‘The Gasbag’ Hoyer who, just this past February had said, “The first, most dramatic thing we found was there is no crisis at the border.”  And it was AFTER this moron had visited the border, near El Paso, that he chose to utter what was really nothing more than an outright lie. It has been for a very long time that whenever one of these Democrats opens their mouth, whatever comes out of it is most assuredly a lie.  And it’s a trend that shows no sign of coming to an end.

On social media, the Democrat Party has seemed to leave itself little or no room for nuance regarding its position on our southern border.  Democrat governors across the U.S. also contended that there was no crisis, and their positions on the issue resulted in less manpower at the U.S.-Mexico border.  Three Democrat governors — Gavin Newsom of California, Tony Evers of Wisconsin, and Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico all pulled their state’s National Guard troops from the border.

And it was that Democrat bonehead Evers who, back in February said, “There is simply not ample evidence to support the president’s contention that there exists a national security crisis at our southwestern border.”  And he then went on to say, “Therefore, there is no justification for the ongoing presence of Wisconsin National Guard personnel at the border.”  I can only assume that they must grow them pretty stupid up there in Wisconsin, especially if this boob can get himself elected.

And it’s as these claims that there is no crisis at the border are being made that literally thousands of illegals have continued to reach the U.S. border every month, pushing immigration facilities past their breaking point.  April marked the second consecutive month where encounters at the southern border topped 100,000 and Border Patrol apprehension numbers have risen every month this year.  Yet Democrats stubbornly refuse to accept the fact that this is anything other than a crisis.

Pelosi said it was necessary for the Republicans and Democrats to reach a consensus on immigration reform. Well no shit, Nancy!  “We have to, I believe, come to comprehensive immigration reform,” she continued. “We have to do it in a way that secures our borders, has a path to citizenship, respects the value of family to us.”  Perhaps such a thing could actually be accomplished if Democrats were truly interested in putting the country before their need to create more Democrat voters.    

Let’s face it, there is absolutely no love of country that can be found anywhere in the Democrat Party, the party in which patriotism is little more than a dirty word.  And sadly, a more disgusting bunch of human beings cannot be found anywhere on the planet.  If a Democrat tells you they love this country, they’re lying to you.  They are a treasonous bunch who have been on, for decades, that which is nothing less than a mission to destroy America.  And yet we just keep on giving them the chance to do so.

The reality here is that this is really nothing more than your classic Leftist behavior. Deny that there's a problem until it's so bad that you must admit it exists because otherwise you look absolutely insane, but then you simply declare that you never denied it and that it's all your opponent's fault. Lies, double-standards, hypocrisy, that's all the Left has. They know their insane ideology will fail but they don't care because, for as long as they are in power, they will enjoy that power to the fullest.

It's time for the American people to recognize the true crisis that exists at our border, and the danger caused by the illegal entry into our country by individuals not looking for amnesty but instead are looking to infiltrate and establish terrorist cells under the cover of the ongoing immigration problems. Look at how many ‘other than Mexicans’ are caught, where they come from and how many of those are from countries who still sponsor and support terrorists intent on harming Americans.

And, on the other hand, Pelosi and her Democrats have made it abundantly clear that they hate God, they hate Christians, they hate our heritage and our traditions. They have made it abundantly clear that they have nothing but contempt for our Bill of Rights, our Constitution and our American way of life.  The have made it abundantly clear that they have organized and orchestrated and coordinated and funded and aided and abetted and encouraged what is nothing less than an invasion.

Clearly, the Democrat Party must be purged from our political system.  Democrats are a menace, they are dangerous and they pose a very serious threat to our ability to survive as a free and sovereign nation.  If we are to have any hope of passing down to our children the same nation that was passed down to us, then we must rid ourselves of those who now seem so determined to prevent us from doing that very thing.  Democrats have continued to makes clear that they are too defective to lead.

BE WARY OF JUDGES WHO PUT POLITICS ABOVE THE CONSTITUTION…

Over the last several years, even going back into the Obummer years, I don’t think it has become much of a stretch to say that America now seems to be under siege by what can be described as being a rather left-leaning judiciary.  And while President Trump has done much in his attempt to rectify that situation, it has been over the course of the last couple of years that we’ve seen a rather disconcerting number of examples where a growing number of political hacks dressed in black robes have seemed to be far more interested in advancing the left’s political agenda than in following our Constitution.  It’s almost as if we are now being held hostage by a cadre of black robed anarchists, many of whom have succeeded in taking the term ‘activist judge’ to what is an entirely all new, and very dangerous level. 

When it comes to the Judicial Branch of our government, there is a role for it to play ensuring the survival of our Republic but there are areas in which it has no business even attempting to get involved in.   One such area over which it has absolutely zero jurisdiction is that of national security.  There is but one individual responsible for the protecting of the nation, and that is the President of the United States.  And it was yet again that we have another rogue judge choosing to insert himself into an area that he has absolutely no business trying to insert himself but, because the area of concern, illegal immigration, is near and dear to the heart of Democrats and President Trump has a different approach, this judge, appointed by Barry, saw fit to declare the president’s actions unconstitutional.

And so by now I’m sure that all have heard about how a U.S. District Judge, Jon S. Tigar, has issued a temporary restraining order after hearing ‘arguments’ in San Francisco.  The request was made by two groups that are essentially nothing more than front groups for the Democrat Party, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Center for Constitutional Rights, which quickly sued after President Trump issued the ban this month in response to the massive caravans of migrants headed to the U.S. and that have now officially arrived at the U.S.-Mexico border.  There is nothing in the ruling that stops the hardened border enforcement and/or current expedited review and deportation program.  In essence, keep the illegal aliens out and the judicial ruling is moot, at least until defeated in higher courts. 

Though it will likely frustrate Democrats, as well as their many cohorts in the left-wing ‘fake news’ media along with the many others in the open borders crowd, no court can successfully demand that the President of the United States stop all manner of border enforcement.  This is why it is critical to have a strong Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary focused on stopping illegal entry.  This ruling will obviously be appealed by the Department of Justice (DOJ); and, politically, the Democrats realize, in the big scheme of things, this ‘open-border’ narrative is not good for them.  But, at least for the short term Democrats continue to think that there is some level of political gain to be made, and so we shouldn’t expect their calls for an open border to fade away anytime soon.   

On its face this ruling is ridiculous as it eliminates/undermines the legal process for asylum requests by removing the distinction of illegal or unlawful conduct in the application process.  President Trump issued a proclamation on 9 November that said anyone who crossed the southern border would be ineligible for asylum. The regulations, which will remain in place for three months absent a court order, could potentially make it harder for thousands of people who enter the U.S. to avoid deportation.  In recent years, tens of thousands of immigrants each year have shown up in the Arizona desert or on the north bank of the Rio Grande in Texas, surrendered to immigration agents and requested asylum. President Trump has rightly argued that the recent caravans pose a pretty serious threat to our national security.

Here we have another political hack in a black robe who has come totally off the rails and who has allowed himself to be convinced that he somehow possesses the authority to dictate to the president how he can carry out the duties of his office.  The issue at hand is a National Security crisis and it the president, and the president alone, who has the authority to do whatever it is that he deems necessary in dealing with it in his effort to protect American people and the sovereignty of the nation.   And in carrying out the most important duty, that of Commander in Chief, the president has the moral right to ignore this judge’s order.  These hostile mobs of insurgents declined asylum in Mexico therefore are not ‘entitled’ to asylum and must apply for immigration status in accordance with all U.S. laws, rules and regulations. 

Now I may be wrong in thinking this, but I do not see what enforcement powers this judge can bring to bear, particularly since his ruling infringes on the Constitutional responsibility of the President to defend the nation’s security, starting with its borders. I would say to the judge, the case has no standing; you can rule all you want, but just try to enforce it. I also would come back at the judge with proceedings to impeach, convict, disbar, and then charge with sedition, and prosecute. When other leftist judges see what happens to one of them acting out of bounds, it should deter more than a few of them. Again, the best defense is a good offense, so I would take every one of these overreaching rulings by leftist judges as opportunities to go right at them with every hammer in the tool chest of the Executive Branch.

OUR ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION PROBLEM, CREATED BY DEMOCRATS…

I say self-inflicted because it all started with a creation of Teddy Kennedy’s called The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.  The passage of which marked a fundamental change in America’s immigration policy because rather than serving the interests of Americans and national unity by setting limits on immigration, the act put “family unification” as the top priority, serving the interests of foreigners first.

And it was at the time that Teddy made the following claims about his little creation:

Teddy said, “First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same. 

Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset… Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia…

In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think… The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.”

Thankfully since then old Teddy has moved on to the great beyond where, as I so fervently hope, he will spend all of eternity rotting in Hell.  But, knowing the perverted old drunkard like we all did, how have Teddy’s claims stood up to the passage of time?  Well, I’m afraid not exactly as old Teddy predicted they would, which should come as no surprise since he knew he was lying when he made them. 

Because you see:

Fifty years later, the Census bureau predicts that the foreign-born population is set to increase 85 percent by 2060, where Hispanics will see their number grow by the tens of millions and native-born whites are the only group expected to decline in both absolute numbers and fertility rates.

Fifty years later, the U.S. places no numerical limit on the immediate family members of aliens admitted into the country. Despite holding only five percent of the world’s population, the U.S. is the most popular destination in the world for immigrants, attracting 20 percent of all the world’s migrants.

Fifty years later, the U.S. allows some 11 to 20 million illegal aliens to squat on its territory while allowing over one million more each year to legally enter the country.

Fifty years later, the native-born population of whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Jews and all the rest suffer economic loss while the foreign-born see net job growth.

Fifty years later, Central American governments are propped up by $12.2 billion in remittances taken out of the American economy by foreign workers the U.S. refuses to tax or expel.

Fifty years later, Central American migrants, thousands of whom are indigenous Mayans who can’t write or speak even Spanish, storm the border in endless waves while federal agents fly them to nearly every state in the union without so much as a photo ID — while American citizens are fondled and scanned by the very same TSA agents.

Fifty years later, we had Rep. Luis Gutierrez threatening Americans in Spanish, vowing that they will be made to suffer “electoral punishment” for resisting a path to citizenship for illegal aliens, declaring his one loyalty is the not to the United States but to foreigners breaking immigration laws, and printing “Do Not Deport Me” cards for those same individuals.

Fifty years later, Americans were led by a president, Barry ‘O’, who illegally granted deportation stays for five million illegals that allowed them to get Social Security numbers (and therefore the ability to vote in U.S. elections) along with $35,000 per head in tax benefit freebies forcibly taken from Americans who managed to hold onto their jobs, who joyfully predicted that a “President Rodriguez” will leave the borders wide open for future tsunamis of immigrants.

Fifty years later, American schools punish “racist” students who wear shirts depicting the American flag and taxpayer-funded colleges vote to ban the flag after angry illegal immigrants complain it “triggers” them.

Fifty years later, American marathon runners walk on prosthetic limbs and suffer through countless painful surgeries after Moslem Chechen immigrants Tamerlane and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were granted asylum so they could plot against the country that bent over backwards to accommodate them.

Add to all that the costs Americans pay in lower wages, strained social safety nets, their children’s blood, their declining quality of life, the chaos of sharing space with an ever-swelling criminal population aided and abetted by the nation’s elite, the berating Americans of every stripe endure when they dare ask their country merely be preserved, that’s the real legacy of Teddy ‘The Boozer’ Kennedy.

If nothing else this provides yet another example of how the Democrat Party and those who insist upon voting for Democrats, have long been the greatest threat this country has ever been made to face.  And we now find our country in a situation for which there may be no real solution.  And because this is yet another mess created primarily by Democrats, Democrats have no interest in finding a solution.

And again, what we see happening is exactly what was intended to happen.  But this is but one more example of the damage that has been done to this country by a political party that has been focused for decades on one thing, the complete destruction of the greatest experiment in human freedom ever created.  And we the people have played a very active role in essentially bringing about our own demise.

Our Constitution is neither a self-actuating nor is it a self-correcting document.  It requires the constant attention and devotion of ALL our citizens. There is a story, often told, that upon exiting the Constitutional Convention, back in 1787, Benjamin Franklin was approached by a group of citizens asking what sort of government the delegates had created.  His answer was: “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Well it took us a bit over 230 years but today our republic is now quite literally hanging by a thread.  And while, I suppose, it would be very easy to lay all of the blame on our politicians, the sad truth of it is that we the people had to elect those politicians.  Politicians who claimed to have the best interests of our country at heart but in fact are interested in nothing more than what remains best for them.

And then once they’re elected too many of us are too blind, too ignorant or simply too uninformed to recognize that they have no interest in us or the country, and never did.  So here we are, on the verge of having squandered something so rare and leaving behind for our children not a legacy of freedom, but of potential servitude to a government not of, by and for the people but of, by and for the political elite. 

HOW BEST TO DEAL WITH SANCTUARY CITIES…

Please excuse me if I don’t appear as enlightened as those of you who reside there in the outer regions of leftwing kookdom, but no matter how hard I try I simply do not understand the entire concept of “sanctuary cities’.  I mean, am I to understand that the residents of these fair cities, right down the last person, are in complete and total agreement with their city’s leaders when it comes to harboring these known criminals and for no other reason than because those criminals are in this country illegally?  And that those same leaders refuse to hand them over to federal immigration officials when apprehended?  And can I also assume that since I rarely, if ever, see any protests ‘against’ this unlawful practice, that the residents of these cities have no problem with this practice?  Because I’ll tell ya, if I were to live in any one of these cities I would most definitely make my concerns known and if ignored I would move by family because of my concern for their safety.

So anyway, imagine my surprise when I heard the news that the number sanctuary cities has now increased to nearly 500 and apparently all thanks to a recent push in counties and jurisdictions avowed to shield illegal aliens against President Trump’s immigration policies.  Now what do you suppose it is that would motivate these places to put so many of their own citizens at such great personal risk?  And yet, it’s according to The Washington Times that the ‘Ohio Jobs & Justice Political Action Committee’ (OJJ) keeps a running list and has added over three dozen new cities just this year.  And, apparently, it’s the founder of this little group, someone by the name of Steve Salvi, who has promised, “More will be coming. A lot of communities now, there’s resolutions in the works and citizens groups encouraging city councils to pass them.”  So again I would ask you, are those who live in these cities, and counties, agreeable to all of this?

Now that said, there are cities on OJJ’s list which dispute their inclusion and some will soon be removed because their sanctuary status is about to change.  The Times states two cities in Alaska, Dayton, Ohio, and Miami, Florida, most surprisingly, will soon be removed after confirmation with Homeland Security.  It only took one day after Trump’s threat to withhold federal funding from cities who choose to harbor immigrants for Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez to announce his city’s compliance with assisting federal agents with deportations.  According to the report, “U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency that handled deportations, says 279 municipalities refused to cooperate on at least one case in fiscal 2016.”  And it goes on to add, “All told, those sanctuaries released more than 2,000 illegal immigrants back onto the streets that ICE agents had been trying to deport.”

Since they represent absolutely nothing of value to America, why are so many of our cities rushing to protect illegals who are not only criminals but thieves who steal the social services paid for by citizen taxpayers.  Might it, perhaps, have something to do with politics?  I’m just guessing, of course.  And I suppose the only hope is that voters in these locales will come to vote their traitorous leaders out of office at the first opportunity as well as publicize the obvious increase in crime and other associated problems from the keeping of illegals in their midst.  But then, as I was pondering earlier, can there be that many voters who go along with this madness?  Personally, from my point of view, being a fiscal realist, the more cities that select themselves to be excluded from federal funds, the closer we get to balancing our budget.  And they must also be committed to allowing an increase in crime rates, since they will shield even criminal illegals.

Now I do, however, find it rather interesting that according to Mexico’s immigration laws, every article of law controls illegal immigration into Mexican territory. If you immigrate to Mexico, Article 32 states you must speak Spanish and must be a professional who is useful to the Mexican society.  There are no bilingual programs in the school and no pressing 2 for English. All business must be conducted in Spanish. Investors are welcome; but must pay higher than minimum wage and your land purchases are restricted. And it’s Article 34 that states foreigners must have the necessary funds to support themselves and their dependents. There are no welfare programs, food stamps, government housing or entitlements.  And Article 87 states foreigners must be “physically and mentally healthy.”  Articles 73, 85, 86, 87 state foreigners must be on a national population registry, cooperating with federal local, and municipal police.

And then it’s Article 116 which states that foreigners using fake documents face a fine and imprisonment. Immigrants must show birth certificate to show citizenship. Articles 117-121 state foreigners who fail to obey laws will be fined, deported, and felons imprisoned. No one is allowed to enter the country with a criminal record. There is no due process of deportation. There is no 14th Amendment. Law enforcement officers are required to enforce Mexico’s immigration laws at all times. Articles 123-126 make illegal immigration a felony. Articles 127 state any Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner is subject to five years in prison.  So here’s a suggestion, how about we simply pattern our immigration laws here in the U.S. after those of Mexico?  After all, if it’s good enough for them, it should be good enough for us, right?  Hell, you’d think even old Jorge Ramos would go along with that, right?

To think that illegals, who in many cases are illiterate in their own language and have very limited skills to earn a living, could actually contribute to America in any meaningful way, as the way the Left continues to assert, you would think that they would be assets back in the country where they came from.  But the fact is they are departing in mass numbers that are essentially being ignored, if not welcomed by their own society, which means that their potential contributions were negligible where their spoken language was understood.  Let’s face it, it takes some level of talent and/or skill to be an asset on foreign soil, but the Left appears to only care about the number of dependents who might also become dependable votes for the Democrat Party.  Hence the rationale for placing our citizens, and those who have come here legally, at risk.  And all under the guise of diversity.  

And so why is it that this is such a Republican versus Democrat issue?  For one reason and only one reason.  All you gotta do is follow the votes. Democrats only care about the votes.  Republicans, while alarmed by the votes, are more concerned about the social costs, both in dollar costs as well as public safety and quality of life costs.  Both sides know that at some point, illegals will get amnesty on some basis.  Both sides know that in the meantime, illegals are already voting in greater and greater numbers.  Motor voter was designed to bring in minority and illegal voters.  DACA makes it easier for dreamers to register and to vote.  No literate individual, on either side of the issue, can deny this with a straight face.  The difference is, Conservatives have the law and the interests of our country on their side. Democrat either don't care or ignore the costs associated with the invasion while hiding behind their false compassion.

Some will claim that the cutting of federal funding is virtually a useless endeavor, that all it will do is to infuriate the Democrat base voters that live in these cities and lead to violence and destruction of private commercial property as is typical of the liberal Democrat protest ‘rally’.  Others purpose a more ‘drastic’ sort of response.  They say we should, instead, select 1 major California city, say San Francisco.  Use U.S. Military troops to first surround the city and then arrest the Mayor, Chief of Police, City Council, and impound their accounts and holdings.  Then charge them with treason for failing to protect the people from threats that are both foreign and domestic.  Then proceed to cut all federal funding, deny State access, broadcast to the city that any illegal or undocumented alien will be treated accordingly if they surrender peacefully, those that do not will be incarcerated in a Federal Prison.  Too severe?  I wonder.

And it would be those same folks who advocate such extreme measures who also make the argument that the entire expense for such an operation should then be charged against the both the offending state and local governments.  Now I’m thinking that something like this would likely only need to occur once, or possibly twice, before the message was received loud and clear by other states and municipalities that insistent upon breaking federal immigration laws.  And I think we would begin to see more and more cities abandoning the practice.  And frankly, if cutting funds were to lead to rioting and destruction, so what. I’m quite sure that the voters in those cities would soon grow tired of it and either choose to get rid of their socialists leaders, or to relocate to somewhere that was less accommodating to those in this country illegally.  And by the way, cutting funding to such cities would also be a great way to fund construction of the wall. 

And while I suppose it’s important to at least consider the potential for collateral damage when it comes to any potential riots, in both the cost in both property as well as in lives lost, we should not let that cloud our judgment nor prevent us from looking at the bigger picture.  And as much as I might be in favor of letting these bastions of leftwing lunacy burn, there would be unintended consequences generated that would affect those communities then made to deal with the influx of those fleeing the cities and everything that they tend to bring with them.  How often do you hear other communities complain about liberals fleeing California bringing their trash with them?  So in order to spare those outlying communities, we would need to very swiftly make examples of those cities who continue to refuse to see the error of their ways.  If there were severe consequences for those cities who choose to ignore federal law I think we would soon see their number drop rather precipitously.

ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, MOST FOLKS AGREE WITH TRUMP…

Despite the never ending stream of propaganda, as well as the outright incendiary rhetoric, that we continue to hear from any number of Democrats and faux journalists/activists such as George ‘Jorge’ Ramos, claiming illegal immigration is not a problem, a recent survey would seem to indicate that a majority of Americans do actually think that illegal immigration is a “very serious” problem.  And not only that, but it would also seem indicate that there are a great many of Americans who would support measures to deport illegal immigrants currently living within the country.

It was this most recent survey that also found that: 1) Half of Americans would report an employer they suspected of hiring illegal immigrants to the government, 2) Nearly half of Americans would support the government “actively searching for illegal immigrants who have not committed any other crimes to deport them from the United States,” and 3) 39% of respondents would report their neighbors for being illegal immigrants.  Now if you listen to no one other than Democrats and those in our state-controlled media you would have no idea that most Americans feel this way.

Those taking part in this specific survey were asked, “How serious a problem is ILLEGAL immigration in the US?”   As it turned out, 51% of respondents replied that it is “very serious,” while 26% responded illegal immigration is “somewhat serious,” and 15% described illegal immigration as only a “minor problem.”  In total, 77% of respondents believe illegal immigration is either a “very serious” or “somewhat serious” problem. Including the 15% who responded illegal immigration is a “minor problem,” 92% of Americans view illegal immigration as a problem.

Individuals were also asked about certain measures they would support in order to remove illegal immigrants currently in the country.  And 55% claimed they would support “creating a phone number where people could report activity connected to illegal immigration to the government.”  And it turns out that 26% would “definitely” and 24% would “probably” report an employer who was suspected of illegally employing illegal immigrants to the government.  Meanwhile 13% said they would “definitely not”, 19% stated they would “probably not,” and 18% were unsure.

And it was just a little less than half, or 48%, of respondents who replied that they would either “strongly support” (23%) or “somewhat support” (25%) the government “actively searching for illegal immigrants who have not committed any other crimes to deport them from the United States.”  Of the individuals polled, 38% opposed such a policy of actively searching for illegal immigrants in order to deport them, with 21% responding they would “strongly oppose” the measure and 17% replying they would “somewhat oppose” it.  Those are mostly likely our ‘friends’ on the left.

But when it comes to reporting their neighbors, there Americans are a bit more divided. Those taking part in the poll were asked, “If you suspected that illegal immigrants were living in a house in your neighborhood, would you report this to the government?”  While 17% responded they would “definitely not” and 24% responded they would “probably not” report their suspected illegal immigrant neighbors to the government, 39% of respondents would “definitely” (19%) or “probably” (20%) report their neighbors to the government if they were suspected of being illegal immigrants.

In this survey, 52% claimed to support a pathway to citizenship, as defined as “a way for illegal immigrants currently in the country to gain legal citizenship if they pass background checks, pay fines, and have jobs.”  And regarding deportation, the survey asked, “There are just over 11 million illegal immigrants in the United States” and then asked, “Do you think it is possible for immigration agents to find and deport most of these people?”  In response, 61% of those polled said it is either “definitely not” or “probably not” possible to find and deport “most of these people.”

Which, I guess, brings me to what was an angry little speech given by presidential non-candidate ‘Slow Joe Biden’ at a Hispanic Heritage Month event in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday.  It was during this speech that he referred to the language being used by Donald Trump as “sick”.  But this is language that makes a lot of sense to a lot of people.  And what is truly sick is the mentality of those like ‘Slow Joe’ who seem to go out of their way, and in what is very plainly an attempt to gain votes, to justify the ignoring of federal law regarding illegal immigration.

Scumbags like ‘Slow Joe’ spend a lot of time casually glossing over, or leaving out of the conversation entirely, the number of violent crimes being committed by those who are in this country illegally.  These illegal immigrants have no problem whatsoever compounding the fact that they are already breaking our laws, simply because they’re in our country, by choosing to commit some of the most heinous crimes imaginable.  Yet those on left, ones like ‘Slow Joe’, are only too happy to not talk about any of that. Because, you see, that wouldn’t be politically correct.

THE BOOB FROM SOUTH OF THE BORDER…

Since when should it seen as being in any way appropriate, or even acceptable, for the leader of some third world country to come into this country and to dictate to us, the United States, how it is that we MUST go about the allowing of immigrants to enter our country. Who does such a person think he is that he is somehow entitled to make such demands, especially when his own country has far stricter laws for doing so than does this country? And especially when it is his country that has been holding an American citizen whose only crime was that he got lost, in his prison for the last 5 months!

And in sounding very much like your basic card-carrying member of our very own Democrat Party it was Mexico's president, Enrique Pena Nieto, who recently spoke about what he referred to as the need for U.S. immigration reform. Nieto was in this country on a two-day visit to immigrant-friendly California. And what he said sounded eerily familiar to the continuing rhetoric that we have been hearing, ad nauseam, from our own president as well as many members of his party. Nieto made the same idiotic claim that those who reject diversity and inclusion will ultimately be proven wrong.

It was in a speech given just yesterday that we heard this leftist imbecile say, "We want to be a factor of cohesion, not division, with full respect for the sovereignty of the United States." He then went on to say, "This, at the end, is about — and only about — a matter of justice for those who contribute so much to the development of the American society." Nieto was of course welcomed with open arms by none other than Jerry "Moon Beam" Brown, who played up his own immigration credentials in a speech that highlighted the close cultural and historical ties they share across borders.

Old ‘Moon Beam’ very proudly declared, "It wasn't very long ago that the governor of California was outlawing driver's licenses for people who were undocumented from Mexico." He added, "That's not the law anymore." Brown signed a bill into law just last year that will enable immigrants to get driver's licenses next year. He said he got the message after a visit to a Monterey artichoke field where the workers yelled "licencia, licencia." I think we are all able to see through what was ‘Moon Beam’s’ very obvious political motivation for doing so. He’s not nearly as clever as he thinks himself to be.

You it was in 1994 that the people of California voted in sufficient numbers to ensure the passage of Proposition 187 which sought to ban immigrants who are in the country illegally from access to social services including health care and education. But as is usually the case the will of the people was later overturned by some activist judge who likely put politics above all else. Especially since Hispanics have now become a political force to be reckoned with in California. They now make up the largest of any racial or ethnic group in the state, though their voter registration numbers still lag behind whites.

On Tuesday, ‘Moon Beam’ will host a luncheon in the Mexican president's honor in the state capital, Sacramento. Nieto will then address the Legislature at the state Capitol. ‘Moon Beam’ invited Nieto to California after visiting Mexico last month and signing several nonbinding agreements on trade, education and environmental cooperation. The two politicians, Mayor Eric Garcetti and community leaders addressed hundreds of enthusiastic Mexican and Mexican-American leaders at the Millennium Biltmore Hotel in Los Angeles. One wonders how many were actually here legally.

Nieto took it upon himself to criticize what he called those unethical governors who had cracked down on immigrants, though he didn't name any specifically. "There are still states that have not evolved so much as California, that still skimp on recognition and, even worse, the rights of immigrants," he said. "Those who still believe and bet for the exclusion and discrimination or the rejection of diversity ... I only have one thing to say: the future, and a very near future, will demonstrate your ethical mistake. Time will show we're right." If I didn’t know better I’d swear I was listening to ‘Dingy Harry’ Reid.

What follows here is but a brief excerpt from what is current Mexican Immigration Law. It would greatly behoove America to follow Mexico’s example when it comes to how they address those who wish to enter our country.

• Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
– Foreigners are admitted into Mexico "according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress." (Article 32)

– Immigration officials must "ensure" that "immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents. (Article 34)

– Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets "the equilibrium of the national demographics," when foreigners are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when "they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy." (Article 37)

– The Secretary of Governance may "suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest." (Article 38)

• Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
– Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)

– A National Population Registry keeps track of "every single individual who comprises the population of the country," and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)

– A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

• Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
– Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)

– Foreigners who sign government documents "with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses" are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

• Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:
– Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)

– Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)

– Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico — such as working without a permit — can also be imprisoned.

• Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says:
– "A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally." (Article 123)

– Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)

– Foreigners who "attempt against national sovereignty or security" will be deported. (Article 126)

• Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:
– A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)

– Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)

ONCE AGAIN TRUTH IS STRANGER THAN FICTION…

It seems to me that with each passing day things become all the more flipped upside down. Things just seem to make a whole lot less sense than they used to. And I get so frustrated that it doesn’t seem that there all that many people who seem to be all that concerned about the fact that the country is not so slowly being made to come unraveled. It’s like they don’t want to expend any amount of effort to do something about it. They content to remain nothing more than bystanders, more interested in just watching things come apart than taking any sort of action to prevent what’s taking place right before their eyes.

One particular example that points out just how upside down things have now become would be for one to ask, "Where else but in America would one be able to find a crowd of individuals, who by the way are in the country illegally, permitted to assemble outside the residence of the leader of that country without them being immediately rounded up, arrested and then, shortly thereafter, deported? Because it’s just such a thing that occurred yesterday when a crowd of undocumented immigrants picketed the White House, urging advocacy groups to refuse meetings with Barry "Almighty" until he agreed to include them in any talks.

One of the organizers of this idiotic little gathering of illegal immigrants was some moron by the name of Rosi Carrasco. Ms. Carrasco told the Washington Times, "We are among the millions of people who will either benefit or be harmed by the decisions the president makes, and we are here to represent ourselves in any future negotiations." This crowd was comprised of people who are nothing more than criminals, since they are breaking our laws. And many were heard chanting, "No more meetings about us, without us," at a rally near Lafayette Park. These people knew they had nothing to fear, as far as being apprehended and then deported

The ‘protest’ was organized by some group that identifies itself as being the National Day Laborer Organizing Network. Supposedly this group is worried that Barry may be trying to lower expectations regarding what it is that he claims that he can do and that advocacy groups may be far too accommodating in the process. The immigrants' picket line went up after protesters made unscheduled visits to the Center for American Progress, which is one for those George Soros front groups, as well as to the National Immigration Forum and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights.

Though advocacy groups want to maintain momentum on the immigration issue, and halt deportations, Barry has come under increasing pressure to deal with this outgoing surge of migrant children crossing into the United States illegally through the southern border. "We have one shot to convince him to do the right thing," a letter sent to the advocacy groups' offices said. I’m curious, though, what is it that makes these people think that they are ones to decide what is the right thing to do? They don’t even belong here! They are breaking our laws and still feel entitled to dictate to us, and to lecture us, regarding how OUR laws are to be enforced.

No other country in the world would tolerate such a thing. And yet we in this country are expected to. Mexico certainly wouldn’t nor would any other country in Central America. And since we now have, in Barry "Almighty", a president who sees this as being the perfect opportunity to expand his party’s base, nothing, and I mean absolutely nothing, is being done to fix this growing problem. At the same time he’s calling for ‘comprehensive immigration reform’, he refuses to enforce any of the immigration laws on the books. And by doing so he’s only encouraging more people to come here.