DEMOCRATS, I’VE SEEN THIS ACT BEFORE…IT WAS AT THE CIRCUS!!!

Let me be perfectly clear, I am not about to allow myself to be lectured to by someone who, I think we can all agree, is nothing more than a member of a political party that, while it has little love for the American people, has such a great amount of love for itself. And it was their refusal to stand during President Trump’s ‘State of the Union Address’ to acknowledge “the first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens,” that was really nothing more than a confirmation of what we all already knew. After all, the Democrats prove that pretty much every day. That they could not care less about the American people.

And we saw that yet again just this past Thursday on CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360.” It was then that Rep. Dan Goldman argued that the Trump administration did not have an objective for its military action in Iran. Personally, all I see here is Goldman the moron flailing about trying to make something stick. I remember back in the day when there was at least one or two Democrats who actually supported common sense, at least in how it was applied to our national security. That clearly no longer seems to be the case. Other than the objectives that the Administration has repeatedly, and very clearly, expressed, we have no idea what the Administration's objectives are.

Goldman said, “I mean, and we’re seeing it now with, the bad intelligence about the school that the US military blew up and killed 175, mostly children. Now we’re seeing that they didn’t anticipate that Iran would actually retaliate is that really what they’re saying right now? And this is why it’s not an academic discussion about following the Constitution and going to Congress, because if you do go to Congress, you need to present a plan. You need to present a strategy. You need to present and day after plan, you need to present an objective. They don’t even have an objective here. It’s unclear entirely. I don’t think they know what they’re trying to do."

Goldman went on to say, “That is why you do not send American troops, the American military, into a war that you are unprepared for, and that you do not have any idea how the, enemy is going to react. And so we’re seeing Americans dying, injured. We’re seeing Iranian children killed, and now we’re seeing a massive economic stress of the Strait of Hormuz being closed. It’s not just oil. There’s so much that goes through there that’s going to crush the economy in many other ways.” Strange, or maybe not so strange, is how he conveniently disregards the fact that the supposed ‘school’ was, in fact, a repurposed military building next to the IRGC. But I digress.

When a bunch of medieval theocrats want to possess a nuclear bomb so that they can then threaten the rest of the planet, that’s enough of an objective for me. That said, President Trump has made clear the objectives of removing Iran as a threat for at least the last year. But for the purpose of enlightening this moron I will go over them yet again: 1) Eliminate Iran’s ability to enrich uranium and make a nuclear weapon. 2) Eliminate Iran’s ability to develop, manufacture, store, and launch ballistic missiles and drones. 3) Eliminate Iran’s ability to close the Strait of Hormuz. And 4) Remove the present Iranian leadership so a rationale group of Iranian leaders can take over.

But because President Trump neglected to inform the Democrats before he launched his plans, they continue to claim that he doesn’t have a plan. But why is it that he would have chosen to inform the Democrats? I think we all know the answer to that. And as long as we’re talking about objectives, what might the objective be for the Democrats when it comes to their adamant opposition to the removal of a terrorist regime? Clearly one objective of the Democrats is to oppose everything that President Trump does in order to move forward with what remains of that which is their primary objective. Which, of course is, “Death to America!” Sound familiar???

And also, might I also inquire what it might have been that was the Democrat Party’s “objective,” executed by that incompetent moron Jimmy Carter, when it pulled the rug out from under the Shah and in facilitating the return of the Ayatollah Khomeini from exile, aiding/abetting the establishment of Iran as a jihadi terrorist nation state?  And what was the “objective” of the Obama administration when it decided to fly billions in cash on large pallets, all under cover of darkness, to the then Ayatollah in Tehran to fund jihadi terrorism and to further their nuclear weapon development program? Why are there no Democrats seeking answers to those questions?

And while we’re at it can we not also inquire about what the “objective” was for the farcical/failed Joey/Cumala administration, that was run by unelected, unidentified, unaccountable anti-American, anti-Christian, antisemitic, antinomian, anarchist, collectivist, Deep State operatives, in unfreezing frozen Iranian assets so that it too could then be used to fund jihadi terrorism as well as to allow the terrorist regime to intensify its nuclear weapon development program? If a Democrat president was doing what President Trump is doing in Iran, Democrats would be in full support of the mission. But, since the president is Donald Trump, they remain very opposed to it.

President Trump has clearly stated what the objectives are regarding Iran. We are working to eliminate a threat to American interests. We are working to stop a genocidal fundamentalist regime from acquiring nuclear weapons. We are working to stop their production of ballistic missiles and suicide drones. We are also setting the stage for the Iranian people to free themselves from the death cult that currently controls their country. What part is there that has not been stated. The issue is that Goldman is a liar who is blinded by his hatred of President Trump. If the president cured cancer, Goldman and the other Democrats would find something wrong with it.

So just for the sake of argument, let’s assume Goldman is right.  Let’s assume that because Iran claims that school children were killed, we should now simply abandon the current operation and leave Iran alone and allow it to complete its nuclear program, so they are able to fire their missiles at the United States. Yet it remains a fact that we don’t know: if any school got hit by a missile, if it was actually a missile that hit it, or where the explosive device came from. And then, let’s do a quick cost-benefit analysis. Iran killing ten to twenty million Americans in a single day on purpose versus the possible, and accidental, killing of some Iranian school children.

Look, this is far from being rocket science. Even my grandkids are smart enough to figure out what Democrats keep insisting is too difficult for them to understand. Of course, Democrats are masters of the concept of ‘telling a lie often enough that it becomes the truth,’ at least to the morons among us. The only thing hard to understand regarding the elimination of an Islamic, oppressive, murderous, terrorist, tyrannical Iran is why while the Iranians, who have lived under brutal tyranny in Iran, are celebrating Khomeini's death and the overthrow of Iran, the Democrats seem to be mourning it while calling for an end to all hostilities. Does that make any sense?

The objectives are obvious to anyone with an IQ higher than their shoe size, which this imbecile obviously does not possess. Furthermore, sharing classified information with Congress, especially Democrats in Congress, not known for being able to keep classified information to themselves, would be the very last thing any responsible Commander-in-Chief should do. One could explain the objectives ad nauseum to these retards and they would still feign ignorance. If they were wanting to be taken seriously in their opposition, they could argue that the objectives are not realistically attainable and make reasonable comments. But clearly, there are clear objectives.

And finally, I’m curious what the Democrat plan would be if Iran were to actually acquire a nuclear bomb. Because if that were to happen, everything changes. Because were they to use it against Israel, Israel would, of course, respond with nukes of their own. And where Israel cares about protecting its people, Iran’s leadership would be willing to accept massive losses if it meant destroying Israel. After that, Iran would essentially dominate the Middle East. With nuclear weapons, they could threaten their neighbors, and nobody would dare to challenge them. At that point the U.S. would have no good options left. Thus, we must deal with the problem now.