It was long time racist, short time civil rights ‘leader’ and, according to rumor, part time minister, Jimmy Clyburn, another of those members of the House who should have long ago been made to retire, who is once again claiming how blacks are somehow in need of being treated differently than everyone else. It was during one of his routine visits to MSDNC, this time on ‘All In,’ a strange bit of programming hosted by Chris Hayes, that Jimmy stated that the filibuster rule should not apply to voting rights and civil rights. I thought it an odd thing to hear come from a Democrat since it’s Democrats who have a long history of trying to prevent blacks from voting.
Anyway, Jimmy said, “It’s not just HR1 that I’m
concerned about. Remember, it has a lot to do with redistricting with financing
campaigns. That’s got nothing to do with voting rights and civil rights. HR4
that we have renamed the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act is coming forward. We
hope it would be ready by the fourth, the sixth of August, the anniversary of
the 1965 Voting Rights Act so that we can get that out. I don’t think these
things should be subjective to the filibuster. I think it is very clear, if we
can make an exception to the filibuster rules for budgets, we ought to be able
to make it for any other civil or voting right that exists.”
And Jimmy added, “Protected classes are treated
specially, is that ought to not, the filibuster ought not to apply to benefits
and other issues surrounding protective classes. So that’s what I think we
should do. I’m not saying get rid of the filibuster. If the president wants to
keep the filibuster, fine. Let do it for civil rights and voting rights.” Jimmy
is just one of the reasons America is slowly being destroyed from the inside.
The Constitution provides plenary authority over voter laws exclusively to the
individual state legislatures. If voter laws become federalized, the people
lose control of their government. Which, I might add, has long been the goal of
Democrats.
It’s because of those like Jimmy that Congress has now
become completely dysfunctional and if for no other reason than because governing
is no longer the priority for so many of its members. Instead, the priority has
become, at least for those on the Democrat, one of trying to conceive new and
improved ways to cheat when it comes to every election. Democrats argue that
all they are trying to do is to make sure that no one is disenfranchised and
that every vote is counted. But I think we all understand what it is that these
Democrat as truly up to and how they are attempting to bastardize that which
was never meant to be under their purview.
And let’s be honest here, I think we all know that if,
somehow, the roles were to be reversed and it was the Republicans who were,
say, now trying to make changes to election laws that would require a federal
photo ID card that one would be required to present before being allowed to cast
their vote, the Democrats would throwing a hissy fit. And I dare say that old
‘Chuckie’ Schumer himself would spend a month reading the New York City phone
book, if one still exists, in a massive filibuster. There is no right to cheat,
nor should there be. One legal citizen, one vote in person on Election Day. Ink
the fingers if we have to, to prevent extra Democrat votes.
And is it now really too much to ask to want only those
people who possess a pulse, and who live in their voting district, who are not
a convicted felon and are a U.S. citizen, to be allowed to vote and to only
vote once? Apparently so, at least according to those like Jimmy. But you see,
the Democrats would never win any elections if such ‘restrictions’ were ever put
in place. Let’s face it, the ONLY Democrat voters being suppressed would be the
cemetery vote, the convicted felon vote and the illegal immigrant vote, to name
but a few. Democrats have absolutely zero interest in election integrity,
because it creates what would be an impediment for them.
Voting is not a right, it was always meant to be a
privilege in which MEN, who met the requirements, could vote. That’s how Republics
such as ours are able to last. And if the ability to vote is to be extended to
others, which is only fair, then it becomes all the more imperative that
eligibility requirements be very strictly enforced, if for no other reason than
to guarantee that only those entitled to cast a vote, are allowed to do so. But
you see, that’s what Democrats, like Jimmy, routinely refer to as the
disenfranchisement of certain segments of our population, when it’s really
nothing of the sort. The past few
decades are evidence of this. Democracy is mob rule.
So we now have the Democrats wanting filibuster ‘exemptions’
for only those bills that they want to pass while those bills that the Republicans
want to pass would continue to be subjected to the filibuster. If the Democrats
do move forward with getting rid of the filibuster or decide to keep it with these
“exceptions,” as suggested by Jimmy, it will prove to be just as bad for the
country as would packing the Supreme Court or adding states for the sole
purpose of adding Democrat senators. As I’ve said before there seems to be no
interest in actually governing by either side. If we’re going to survive than
it’s going to come down to the will of the people,
And why is it that blacks are always in need of exceptions
to just about everything? That is why this country is now in so much trouble.
We just can’t have a rule that applies to everyone equally. We have to carve
out exceptions to exceptions to the exceptions because there are too many
people who just aren’t capable of following the rules, or because we think that
there are classes or groups that are inherently unable to abide by a rule. No
matter what the subject matter, we have to appeal to the least common
denominator. We just can’t get the votes we need by making effective argument
to our colleagues, so we need a participation trophy exception.
Look, what’s really being pushed here by those like
Jimmy, is the rather sinister attempt to set up what would essentially be a set
of Soviet-style election laws in an effort to establish what would be a
permanent One-Party Marxist State which, or so we are told, would make
everything just peachy-keen for America. Now for the record, one-party states tend
not to result in anything other than enslavement and massive poverty and
homelessness and energy shortages and blackouts and mass anarchy and violence
and starvation and corruption and detentions and censorship and economic
devastation and even genocide. Quite the rosy picture, right?
No comments:
Post a Comment