BIG MISTAKE FOR TRUMP TO ENDORSE PAUL RYAN…

Personally, I wasn’t one of those who was overly concerned about whether or not Trump would choose to endorse Paul Ryan.  And now that he has I’m fairly confident that there will come a day, should Trump win, when he will regret having done so.  I was a little confused by claims that Trump’s failure to do so somehow represented a split in the party.  I had to laugh whenever I heard Trump being criticized, by a mix of Democrats and the NeverTrump crowd, for not endorsing someone who was actually referred to as a “mainstream Republican.”  And I was hoping Trump would end up endorsing is Ryan’s primary opponent, Mr. Paul Nehlen.

Let’s face it, Ryan is nothing if not the “poster boy” for the Chamber of Commerce and as such he very enthusiastically supports the Chambers’ continuing desire for cheap foreign labor regardless of how it might come to impact even his own constituents.  Since practically Ryan first set foot into Congress he has never, ever, been supportive of any of the many attempts that have been made to secure our southern border, or to do anything substantial about the issue of illegal immigration into the country.  While he’s provided plenty of lip service, he has never done anything that would have resulted in a more secure border! NEVER!  

Trump’s endorsement notwithstanding, Ryan needs to display a little honesty and stand up in front of his constituents and say: ‘Look, I’m an open borders guy. The Chamber [of Commerce] believes in it, the Chamber wants cheap labor, [and] I respond to what the Chamber wants. I always have. I’m an establishment guy.’ He needs to tell his constituents who he is. I think that’s the really responsible and respectable thing to do. [Tell voters] ‘I’m for TPP even though, yeah, most of my constituents are going to get hurt by it, but the Chamber wants that.’ He should stand do that because it’s the truth, and he has a responsibility to tell people the truth.

When I hear ‘RINO Ryan’ say things like how he’s so dedicated about doing something about our border, and about how he’s meeting with people to see how we can strengthen the border, I know that it’s all nothing but pure political bullshit!  So what I wish to do here is to throw the B.S. flag.  You know, there’s a reason that people are so cynical about Congress, and about politicians.  And this is one of the reasons why.  Because how can you have a guy, who has dedicated his entire political life essentially to one set of policies, ideas and principles, and then yet come home and tell his constituents something that which is the complete opposite.

There are essentially two problems in trying to deal with the immigration issue. The first problem is, of course, the Democrat Party which views massive immigration, both legal and illegal, as being nothing more than a source of voter pool replenishment. The second problem, and just as powerful an enemy by the way, is the Republican Party which views massive immigration, both legal and illegal, as a source of cheap labor. And that philosophy was represented by the Chamber of Commerce, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.  And by working to achieve their goal the Republicans are doing nothing more than to reduce the life expectancy of their party, my party.

While we may have had, at one time, a viable and robust two party system, it’s been over time that the two parties have moved much closer together, regarding their political philosophy, much to detriment of the country and of the American people, who have been forced to pay a price in both the amount of their hard earned money they are forced to turn over the government and in the amount of freedom that they have lost because of individuals like Ryan.  Conservatives, if they wish to return the Republican Party to what it once was, must position themselves to seize control of it in the same way that the American left has seized control of the Democrat Party.

But I have to be honest, we are rapidly running out of time, as well as the number of chances, we have left to do what so desperately needs to be done.  And if we are to have any hope of being successful in that endeavor, despite Trump’s endorsement of Ryan, we, as voters, must still work as hard as we can to get rid of Ryan and all of those like him in this election.  The truth is, we have within our party today individuals who are really nothing more than a cancer, a cancer that is slowly, but surely, killing our party.  After the 2010, 2012 and 2014 elections we chose to support the Republicans only to find out after the election that we had been lied to.   

And if Trump intends to be of any help in that process then he is going to have to remain focused on that which is the big picture.  And I think had Trump endorsed Ryan’s opponent it would have increased the odds of Ryan’s defeat, which I think would be a good thing.  And by doing so I think he would have accomplished two things, demonstrated his seriousness about immigration reform and that he does intend to push the building of wall through Congress, and he would have put the fear of God into those, like Ryan, who might then start to rethink the Ryan philosophy of putting Americans second, whereas Trump’s desire is to put Americans first. 

Now I’m not here to try to convince anyone that Trump has been some life-long conservative, I’m not that naïve.  But like it or not at least this time around he is the ONLY option that we have if we are going to succeed in our mission of returning the Republican Party to being that which would truly be a conservative alternative to a Democrat Party that has now moved so far to the left as to make it nearly indiscernible from the Communist Party.  To the degree that Chuckie Schumer, Debbie Wizzerman Schultz, and even Hitlery, can’t tell the difference.  So we on the right have just 94 days to come together, and begin turning back to the right.

OBAMA, THE STANDARD BY WHICH THE FITNESS OF ALL OTHERS WILL BE MEASURED…

Can we all at agree on at least one thing? That being, of course, that Barry “Almighty’ does know what he’s talking about when it comes to level of fitness that is required to serve as president of the United States.  After all, he may very well be, even when bringing Jimmy Carter into the mix, the most unfit individual to ever hold the office of president!  After Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard Law School, Barry moved on to become your basic, run of the mill community agitator, then a state senator in the most corrupt state in the entire country, to a U.S. Senator, for two years, and then finally on to president of the United States.

And yet after never having held a position of any responsibility, people viewed his background as being impressive enough for them to vote for him to become their president.  But then had it not been for the fact that he was also black, Barry would have never won any election.  But with that taken into consideration very little else was actually needed.  He was black and that was enough.  So as Barry prepares to leave pubic life and move on to what I’m quite sure will be a very lucrative private life, likely much more so than even the Clintons have managed to enjoy, has Barry provided a good or bad model for those who will succeed him?

As far as I’m concerned there has never been an individual who was more unfit for holding public office, at any level, than Barack Hussein Obama. To my way of thinking there are at least five ways that I feel Barry has disserved his office, as well as those who put him there, and they are as follows:

1. Barry has attacked the most fundamental God-given right — the right to life. 

Before Barry entered federal office, while he was in the Illinois state senate, Barry went so far as to oppose legislation that would have defined a born baby who had survived an abortion as a "person." As president, his dedication to maintaining the legality of killing unborn babies has guided everything from his Supreme Court appointments to the legal battles he has fought all the way to that court.

2. Barry has tried to force Americans to act against their religious beliefs.

The First Amendment guarantees the "free exercise" of religion. But Barry issued a regulation — under Obamacare — requiring most health care plans to cover contraceptives, sterilizations and abortion-inducing drugs and devices. That regulation forces Christian individuals and employers to choose between violating their moral and religious beliefs and dropping their government-mandated insurance coverage. Barry has fought in federal court to enforce this regulation that simultaneously attacks the right to life and freedom of conscience. His administration even fought the Little Sisters of the Poor all the way to the Supreme Court over this regulation.

3. Barry used the federal government to force individuals to buy a product he wanted them to buy.

The Obamacare law included a "requirement" that individuals "shall" secure health insurance. This marked the first time the federal government claimed the power to compel individuals to buy a product. Barry argued that the government got this power from the clause in the Constitution that gives Congress the authority to "regulate Commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes."

Yet people who do not buy health insurance are not engaging in commerce, they are refraining from it. This Obamacare mandate survived only because Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a nonsensical Supreme Court opinion arguing that the "penalty" the law imposed on people who failed to meet this "requirement" could be interpreted as a tax and justified by the government's constitutional taxing power.

4. He has tried to unilaterally change the immigration laws.

Barry's Department of Homeland Security adopted a policy — which it called Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents — that would have allowed millions of illegal immigrants to stay in the United States with work authorizations and Social Security numbers. When unguardedly describing this policy in response to hecklers, Barry said, "I just took action to change the law." When Texas sued to stop it, Barry argued it was an act of "prosecutorial discretion" not a "change" in the law.

A federal district court and appeals court did not agree. The now-eight-member Supreme Court divided 4-4, letting the appeals court ruling stand.

5. He ordered the U.S. military to intervene in Libya's civil war without congressional authorization.

Barry unilaterally ordered the U.S. military to intervene in Libya's civil war in 2011 and said he was doing so to enforce a U.N. Security Council Resolution. "Actions have consequences," Barry said at the time, "and the writ of the international community must be enforced. That is the cause of this coalition." The rebellion that Barry backed with U.S. military force — but without congressional authorization — succeeded in removing then-Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi. Now, the Islamic State has established itself in part of the territory of post-Gaddafi Libya.

Now wouldn’t you think that a guy who has supposedly spent time teaching the Constitution would actually possess at least a basic understanding of what it says?  But apparently such is not the case where Barry is concerned.  Because, you see, the Constitution gives Congress the power "to declare War," which, as James Madison recorded in his notes on the Constitutional Convention, leaves "to the Executive the power to repel sudden attacks." It does not give the president the power to unilaterally order U.S. military action in a foreign civil war to enforce what he calls "the writ of the international community."

Now a president who had served the office well is one who would respect the right to life and the free exercise of religion, refrain from forcing Americans to buy products they do not want and never usurp the powers of Congress to make the nation's laws and authorize the use of military force.  Barry has now become for us the standard by which every American will have the ability to measure the fitness of a candidate to be elected president.  And by so doing we can very plainly see that of the two major candidates from which we have to choose, the one truly unfit for the office that she seeks is none other than Hitlery.    

SPEAKING OF BEING UNFIT IS THE MOST UNFIT OF ALL!!!

If there’s one thing Barry knows a thing or two about it’s how to be unfit to be president.  And as someone who went from being a community agitator to a do-nothing state senator in the most corrupt state in the country to spending just two years, of a six year term, as a U.S. Senator, you’d think he’d be a bit more careful about accusing ANYONE of being unfit to be president.  After all, Barry is the epitome of being unfit, unprepared and woefully incompetent to be president of these United States.  And if the last 8 years tell us anything it’s that Barry was most certainly, at the time of his first election, nothing more than a train wreck waiting to happen. 

But none of that seems to have occurred to him as he chose, during of all things a joint White House press conference with Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, to launch into an attack on Trump, spending more than five minutes explaining why it is that he thinks that Republican presidential nominee is “unfit to serve as president.”  And it was in so doing that Barry pointed to recent statements Trump made about the parents of Capt. Humayun Khan, a decorated Army veteran who was killed in Iraq.  Of course he chose to conveniently leave out of his appraisal of Trump, much of what we have now learned about Mr. Khan since his appearance at the DNC.

And it was Margaret Brennan from the Clinton Broadcasting System (CBS) who brought up the subject of Trump’s “fitness to be president” and referenced Trump’s comments about “the Khan family and his statement that if president he would consider recognizing Russia’s annexation of Crimea.”  She asked Barry if such a statement caused to him question Trump’s fitness for office.  To which Barry responded, “Yes, I think the Republican nominee is unfit to serve as president. I said so last week, and he keeps on proving it.”  Too bad no one asked that question about Barry back in 2008.  But then I doubt George Bush would have responded. 

Khizr and Ghazala Khan, as you may recall, took the stage at the Democrat National Convention for what now appears to be no other reason than to attack Trump.  And since they made their much ballyhooed appearance evidence has now come to light which makes it obvious that these parents had an ulterior motive for appearance.  And then on Saturday, before we had any idea why these people had volunteered their services to the DNC, Mr. Trump questioned whether Khizr’s speech was written by Hitlery’s campaign, and then he questioned why Khizr’s wife, Ghazala, didn’t speak onstage at the convention.  As it turns out now, Trump was right to ask.

And as Mr. Khan made the rounds on all the Sunday shows, it was during CNN’s “State of the Union” that he accused Trump of having “a black soul” and described him as being someone who is “totally unfit” for leadership.  Trump then took to Twitter on Monday, tweeting, "Mr. Khan, who does not know me, viciously attacked me from the stage of the DNC and is now all over T.V. doing the same."  But again, at the very same time that Mr. Khan was making the rounds in order to slam Trump, we were finding out much more about his rather questionable background and what was likely his main motivation for being so vocal about Trump in the first place.

And it quickly became obvious that this was an issue that Barry had no intention of letting go.  He said, “The notion that he would attack a Gold Star family that had made such extraordinary sacrifices on behalf of our country, the fact that he doesn’t appear to have basic knowledge around critical issues in Europe, in the Middle East, in Asia, means that he’s woefully unprepared to do this job.”  And then he went on to add that “this is not just my opinion.”  As if Barry or, his Democrat wanna-be replacement, Hitlery care so very much about any of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice for their country.  Because they most certainly do not!

Anyway, Barry went on to say, “I think what’s been interesting is the repeated denunciations of his statements by leading Republicans, including the speaker of the House and the Senate majority leader and prominent Republicans like John McCain, and the question I think they have to ask themselves is: if you are repeatedly having to say in very strong terms that what he has said is unacceptable, why are you still endorsing him?”  And then, in what was become his very typical smug and arrogant style, Barry went on to ask, “What does this say about your party that this is your standard bearer?”  Frankly, it tells me I got a guy who’s not afraid to fight!

And I guess Barry has long since forgotten his many gaffes, such has claiming there were 58 states or how he thought Hawaii was actually part of Asia, to name just a couple.  Because he said, “This isn’t a situation where you have an episodic gaffe. This is daily and weekly where they are distancing themselves from statements he’s making. There has to be a point at which you say this is not someone I can support for president of the United States even if he purports to be a member of my party.”  Barry added, “And the fact that, that has not yet happened makes some of these denunciations ring hollow.”  Barry truly does think he’s the smartest guy in the room.

And Barry was far from being done with his rant about Trump, and those who support him, as he went on to say, “I don’t doubt their sincerity. I don’t doubt that they were outraged about some of the statements that Mr. Trump and his supporters made about the Khan family, but there has to come a point at which you say somebody who makes those statement doesn’t have the judgement, the temperament, the understanding to occupy the most powerful position in the world, because a lot of people depend on the White House getting stuff right, and this is different than just having policy disagreements.”  What has Barry gotten right in the last eight years?

Barry said he recognizes that Republicans “all profoundly disagree” with him and Democrat presidential nominee Hitlery “on tax policy or on certain elements of foreign policy, but there have been Republican presidents with whom I disagreed with, but I didn’t have a doubt that they could function as president.”  Barry added, “I think I was right, and Mitt Romney and John McCain were wrong on certain policy issues, but I never thought that they couldn’t do the job.”  So he says now.  Look, there is nothing that this lying meat sack could say that would convince me that had he lost in 2008 or in 2012 that he would have made nice with the winner.

And to hear Barry now make the claim that had his Republican presidential rivals won, while he “would have been disappointed,” he still would have told the American people: “This is our president, and I know that they’re going to abide by certain norms and rules and common sense, will observe basic decency, will have enough knowledge about economic policy and foreign policy and our constitutional traditions and rule of law that our government will work, and then we’ll compete four years from now to try to win an election.”  Anyone who actually believes that that would have actually been Barry’s response to losing, is a complete liberal moron.

But Barry still went on to say, “But that’s not the situation here, and that’s not just my opinion. That is the opinion of many prominent Republicans. There has to come a point at which you say enough.”  Barry said, “And the alternative is that the entire party – the Republican Party – effectively endorses and validates the positions that are being articulated by Mr. Trump, and as I said in my speech last week, I don’t think that actually represents the views of a whole lot of Republicans out there.”  Now those “prominent Republicans” to which he refers are the RINOs of our party.  And judging by the polls many Americans DO support Trump’s position on most issues.

And let’s face it, throughout the 1990s and into the early years of the new millennium Trump had consistently said that he had no intention of running for president unless, of course, the country got so screwed up that he would feel compelled to step in and do what he was uniquely qualified to do.  So when the worst president in our nation’s history, worse even than Jimmy Carter, says Trump shouldn't be president he really has no one to blame but himself that Trump is now on the verge of becoming president.  So I wonder, is Barry hinting that if Trump does win the election, he will take it upon himself to rescue the voters from themselves and refuse to step down?

But let’s not forget that it was the Republican elites, courtesy of their many broken promises and endless attacks on the Tea Party that caused his rise to the front of the pack. Trump is the blowback from no significant Republican action against any of Barry’s policies.  And however inarticulate he may be in responding, Trump was attacked by an immigration lawyer, Mr. Khan, who stands to lose substantial business if Trump's stated policies are enacted.  How convenient for Mr. Khan that his son died an American hero. The father surely isn't!  Likewise Trump isn’t exactly proving to be the PR genius he was against his 17 Republican opponents.

But look, while Trump wasn't my first choice he is now the only choice we have unless we want to give the anti-American Socialists control of the Supreme Court.  We have too many Republicans who have grown far too comfortable and they prefer to attack the person rocking the boat instead of helping him row us safely to shore.  Trump is New York tough. If he was still a full-fledged liberal and the Democrat candidate, they would be praising him for the same things they’re now attacking him for and you wouldn't see them calling him out in the press.  Republicans are becoming traitors to their party and by aiding Hitlery, becoming traitors to our country.

THE TRUTH ABOUT KHIZR KHAN, WILLING FLUNKY FOR THE DEMOCRAT PARTY…

Since when is it seen as being in any way acceptable to allow the death of one’s son to be so blatantly exploited for something as routine as a political election, regardless of its significance?  And what’s worse, even sickening, is when the ones playing the primary role in that exploitation are the parents of the deceased.  I’m quite sure, unless you’ve been living under a rock for the last week, that everyone is very familiar with Mr. Khizr Khan.  But for those who might have just crawled out from under a rock, Mr. Khan is the Muslim Gold Star father who the state-controlled media, and Hitlery, have been using to criticize Donald Trump. 

But what you may not be aware of is why this supposed grieving father had absolutely no qualms whatsoever when it came to using his dead son as a means of promoting Hitlery’s candidacy for president.  As we have been witness to throughout the history of our involvement with those, like Mr. Khan, who are followers of Islam, they place very little value, if any, on human life.  After all, these are the very same people who gladly choose to blow themselves up for no other reason than to kill those viewed as being non-believers or ‘infidels.’  So the fact that this man can so casually exploit the death of his own son should really come as no surprise.

And a few rather interesting facts regarding this same man have come to light since he first stepped out onto the stage at the DNC.  And they would seem to show a man who is more than he appears.  For instance, he has some rather deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia, as well as to international Islamist investors through his very own law firm. In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States.  And he is also closely associated with the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation.

So it was then that when Mr. Khan, and his wife Ghazala Khan, appeared on stage at the Democrat National Convention and sacrificed his son’s memory for the cause.  And it is since then that it has now become increasingly clear exactly what their mission was that evening.  It was, quite simply and on behalf of Hitlery, to attack Donald Trump.  Nothing more, nothing less. And what was the rationale for doing so?  For no other reason than because Donald Trump is wanting to temporarily halt Islamic migration to America from countries with a proven history of exporting terrorists.  How absolutely racist of Mr. Trump to even suggest such a thing!

And it was Trump’s comments made later during an interview with Hitlery operative, George ‘Stephy’ Stephanopoulos, who besides serving as an adviser to impeached president ‘Slick Willy’ is also a Clinton Foundation donor as well as a host on the ABC network, about what Mr. Khan said that now seem to have sparked the same mini-rebellion within his party, the state-controlled media and across the aisle that has happened a few times before. The usual suspects inside the GOP, from ‘Low Energy’ Jeb Bush to Lindsey Graham to Paul Ryan to Mitch McConnell to John Kasich, RINOs all, have condemned Trump in one way or another.

The media condemnation has been swift and nonstop, with the Democrats, as well their many friends throughout the state-controlled media, driving the train just as fast as they can.  And until now, it had appeared as if the Khans were just Gold Star parents who big bad Donald Trump had decided were in need of being attacked.  But a funny thing happened on the way to the election.  Because, oddly enough, in addition to being Gold Star parents, the Khans are financially and legally tied to the industry of Muslim migration, to the government of Saudi Arabia as well as to the Clintons themselves.  Imagine that?

You see, Khan used to work at a rather prestigious law firm that also just so happens to be a major D.C. law firm that has been on retainer as being ‘the’ law firm which has represented the government of Saudi Arabia here in the United States for many years. The government of Saudi Arabia, of course, has donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation.  The Kingdom has given between $10 and $25 Million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 Million.  Trump, of course, has repeatedly called on Hitlery to have the Clinton Foundation return the money, but that has yet to happen.

And a lobbyist for this very same law firm is known to have bundled more than $50,000 in donations for Hitlery’s campaign this year.  Khan spent seven years, from 2000 to 2007, working for this law firm serving as the firm’s manager of litigation technology.  Although he did not practice law while at the firm, Khan was well versed in understanding the American courts system.  But representing the Clinton Foundation backing Saudi Arabian government and having one of its lobbyists bundle $50,000-plus for Hitlery’s campaign are hardly the only places where the Khan-connected mega-law firm brush elbows with Clinton Cash.  

And it also just so happens that this very same law firm also handles Hitlery’s taxes and is deeply connected with the email scandal whereby when she was Secretary of State, she set up a home-brew email server system that jeopardized classified information handling and was “extremely careless” according to FBI director James Comey.  A lawyer at this firm has been Slick’s and Hitlery’s go-to guy for tax advice since 2004.  It was recently discovered late last year after an investigation into Hitlery’s email scandal how this firm, which employed Khan at the time that it worked on Hitlery’s taxes, is also connected to the email scandal.

Khan’s own website for his own personal law firm KM Khan Law Office shows he represents clients in the business of buying visas to enter the United States.  But you never know that now because, oddly enough, since new about his rather checkered past is now beginning to see the light of day since his appearance at the DNC, Mr. Khan apparently decided to delete the website for his law firm.  Now why do you suppose he would so something like that?  Perhaps because he’s isn’t exactly what he portrayed himself as being that evening on the stage at the DNC or on any of the many ‘news’ programs that he has appeared on since?

Personally I don't have a problem with anything that Trump said. The Khans sought to take advantage of their 'Gold Star' status in an effort to slam Trump regarding his immigration stance, and they relinquished that status as soon as they stepped foot on the DNC stage. Mr. Khan, as previously stated, is a lawyer who makes lots of money from those seeking to buy their way into America and obviously thought he could make the kind of remarks that he did and remain immune to any retaliation that might come from Trump, again because of his 'Gold Star' status. Mr. Khan was wrong. And since then he has made the rounds to the various news shows to whine about it!

The future of our country is at stake. Anyone who thinks that Hitlery, in any way, is the right person to lead us into what has become, thanks to Barry “Almighty”, a very, very uncertain future is absolutely, and quite mind-numbingly, STUPID!  And anyone who has children, or who hopes to someday have children, must realize that the future envisioned by Hitlery is not the future that most parents envision for their children.  These are very scary times that we are now living in, and love him or hate him, of the two candidates that we have to choose from, Donald R. Trump is the ONLY one who can be trusted to lead us where it is that we need to go! 

KHAN-GATE, THE LATEST BOGUS ATTEMPT TO DERAIL TRUMP???

Our objective state-controlled news media continues to pull out all the stops in what is its obvious attempt to guarantee Hitlery gets elected come this November.  And in so doing those involved in this sleazy occupation have now apparently decided to move on from declaring Donald Trump an agent of the Kremlin and are now gushing over every moment of the Democrat National Convention and fixating itself on yet another fictional story, that Trump hates the families of dead veterans. 

Those watching on the final night of the Democrat ‘kumbaya’ convention watched as Mr. Khizir Khan, a Muslim father who lost his son, Captain Humayun Khan in Iraq 12 years ago, took to the stage with his wife in Philadelphia to deliver what was arguably the most notable speech of the convention.  And it was during this speech that Mr. Khan chose to condemn Mr. Trump for being un-American and sacrificing nothing for the country.  It was a speech that some went so far as to call powerful.

I think we can all assume why the Democrats invited Mr. Khan to speak and why the media has continued to celebrate him ever since. It had nothing to do with any concern for these parents regarding the loss of their son.  And I have a feeling that he likely knew that he was there for one reason and one reason only.  He was there to bait Trump into responding.  And Trump did respond, in an interview with ABC host and former ‘Slick Willie’ aide George ‘Stephy’ Stephanopoulos.

Now as Trump putdowns usually tend to go, The Donald’s response to Mr. Khan’s statements was relatively mild. For one, he said he expressed condolences for the family’s loss and their son’s service. On the negative side, he wondered why Mrs. Khan hadn’t been allowed to speak at the convention, which gave the impression he was implying it was due to her faith. Trump also said in his characteristically humble fashion that he has made sacrifices in developing successful companies.

Now while Trump’s comments may have been somewhat inartful, they were hardly the stuff of vicious denigration. Trump did not attack the service of the Khans’ son and the issue, as later campaign statements pointed out, dealt with the father’s criticism of the Republican nominee’s policies.  Apparently, such a response is to be considered “inhuman”, even “barbaric,” according to the Washington consensus. Thus, we’re in the midst of the most disingenuous Trump outrage story yet generated.

Here are a few things to take away from this supposed scandal.  First of all, Trump and his proposals have zero responsibility for Captain Khan’s death. The same cannot be said of Hitlery, who authorized the Iraq war and continued supporting it long after it was abundantly clear it was a major disaster.  Moreover, her hawkish foreign policy would lead to more unnecessary interventions into the Middle East and other parts of the world and sadly create more Gold Star families like the Khans.

And for anyone to then criticize Trump for his lack of sacrifice, yet overlook Hitlery’s lack of sacrifice and tacitly endorse her policies forcing more American families to lose their children on behalf of what are nothing more than fuzzy ideological objectives is nothing if not totally ridiculous as well as being more than just a little hypocritical.  This entire episode was nothing more than another attempt to somehow portray Trump as being unqualified for the office that he seeks

Secondly, Mr. Khan is draping himself in his son’s death to attack Trump on an issue totally unrelated to his son’s death. A moratorium on countries where radical Islamists are abundant is about national security. Same goes for the proposal to secure the U.S.-Mexico border. The elder Khan claims it is unconstitutional and un-American to do both, when, in fact, legal scholars argue the measures fit very much within the precedents of American immigration law.

To denigrate the Khan family for their sacrifice is wrong and we should honor their son’s service. However, that does not mean the father is immune from criticism on political issues after he decided to take them up in the public arena. Upholding the standard that the families of fallen soldiers should not be criticized for anything is illogical and asinine. We certainly didn’t apply the same standard to Cindy Sheehan and her very well covered crusade against George W. Bush.

And thirdly, the impression given by the media that Captain Khan is reflective of all Muslims who may want to enter in the United States is just as faulty as claiming all Muslims are terrorists.  It is true that 14 Muslims have lost their lives in service to this country since 9/11.  It is also true that over 5000 Muslims are currently serving in our armed services. Various outlets love to report these facts with the hope it transmits the notion that Muslims are somehow incredibly patriotic.  They are not.

Finally, it’s 100 percent certain that our state-controlled media is nothing more than the unofficial arm of Hitlery’s presidential campaign. After a whole week of trying to downplay the Wikileaks DNC scandal they’ve done their best to create a top-down outrage story for the sole purpose of trying to shame Trump and his supporters.  As a Trump supporter I would argue that Mr. Khan’s should be ashamed for allowing himself, and the death of his son, to be exploited by someone like Hitlery.

While claiming that Khan is somehow above any and all criticism due to his loss, many involved in the smear machine that is the state-controlled media had spent nearly all of the prior week attacking Pat Smith, the mother of a Benghazi victim, for allowing herself to be exploited by the Republican National Convention. Her crime?  Sharing the story of how she believes Hitlery is responsible for her son’s death, which clearly has far more basis in fact than does Trump having any responsibility for Khan’s death.

Additionally, our state-controlled media ignored completely the stories of the families at the Republican convention who lost loved ones to illegal immigrants, some who had been deported multiple times but were still able to get back into this country. Their children died as a direct result of policies supported by the Democrat Party, and more specially Barry “Almighty” and Hitlery, but the media plays by a double standard when it comes to who gets to use their tragedy to highlight a policy issue. 

The Khan affair is yet another blatant demonstration that our state-controlled media is deadset against Trump and will blow any story out of proportion to the greatest extent possible in what has become their continuing effort to gin up as much resistance as possible to his candidacy.  Let’s be honest here, the supposed journalists now hyperventilating over Trump’s response to Khan couldn’t care less about Gold Star families or veterans, it’s nothing more than an opportunity to derail The Donald.

And now we’re finding out how Mr. Khan has ties to the government of Saudi Arabia as well as to some international Islamist investors through his own law firm.  In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States, and has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation.  So once again things are not exactly as we’re lead to believe.

Also, Mr. Khan is an attorney who has previously written in a law journal about Islamic law. He specifically wrote about the purity of the Quran and the Sunnah over all other texts and interpretations.  Khan wrote “Juristic Classification Of Islamic Law” in the Houston Journal of International Law in 1983.  In it he also breaks down different levels of Islamic law. Khan writes that the Quran and the Sunnah were the only sources in Muhammad’s lifetime that “were recognized as binding.” 

Look, since I didn’t watch the convention I only heard about the speech after the fact so I didn’t really pay all that much attention to it.  And I think that if it is true that he has ties to the Saudis and to the Clinton foundation there’s no reason not to counterattack his accusations.  And I think that that also might provide us with the reason why it was that he would go out on national television and make the idiotic claim that Islamic terrorists have nothing to do with Islam.  It’s all about politics.

THE OBAMA OF 2004 VS THE OBAMA OF 2016…

So let’s step into our 'Wayback Machine' and travel back in time to that nostalgic time just before then-Senate candidate from Illinois, Barack Hussein Obama, arrived on stage at the Democrat National Convention in 2004.  And then thanks to that which would become in time his piece of never-leave-home-without-it equipment, that being his ever-present teleprompter, it was a much younger Barry “Almighty” that proceeded to wow the crowd with his artificial oratory and set the stage for his presidential run which would come just a mere four years later.

Now, finally nearing the end of his presidency, thank God, Barry once again graced the stage of the DNC in an effort to promote the next Democrat presidential hopeful known affectionately here on these pages as, Hitlery.  But the America that Barry addressed earlier this week is one that has become very deeply divided, and not only along racial lines, but also across political lines and even within the political parties, much more so than it was back in '04. And by comparing his words then to his word choice today that fact becomes all the more stark.

It was in 2004 that Barry spoke like a uniter, far from the divider that he has turned out to be, and like he has for most of the eight years he has spent in office.  It was back then that what we heard from the younger Barry that which was a far cry from we’ve come to hear from the older. It was then that he said, "There is not a liberal America and a conservative America, there is the United States of America."  And he would then go on to say, "There is not a Black America and a White America and Latino America and Asian America -- there’s the United States of America."

But the Barry of 2016 bears very little resemblance to the Barry of 12 years ago.  Because, you see, the Barry of 2016 concedes to the divided America he himself helped to create saying, "I see Americans of every party, every background, every faith who believe that we are stronger together -- black, white, Latino, Asian, Native American; young, old; gay, straight; men, women, folks with disabilities, all pledging allegiance, under the same proud flag, to this big, bold country that we love. That's what I see. That's the America I know!"

And when Barry addressed the crowd back in 2004, his goal seemed then to appeal to his "fellow Americans, Democrats, Republicans, Independents."  That would seem to be a far cry from how it was earlier this week when he addressed a specific group when he said, "Hello, Democrats!"  And it was in describing this current election that he even went so far as to declare that it is the "contest" between the left and the right that "pushes our country forward."  Not like before when he said there's no left, no right, only the U.S.A.  But, as they say, that was then and this is now.

Then-Senate candidate Barry was backing John Kerry-Heinz and praised him in similar ways as he did Hitlery. What he didn't do then was bash the opposition, which is another difference in his two speeches. Because Barry was on the attack this time around, railing against Donald Trump at mockery level:  "You know, the Donald is not really a plans guy. He’s not really a facts guy, either…"America is already great. America is already strong. And I promise you, our strength, our greatness, does not depend on Donald Trump."  So is Barry saying that he’s a facts guy?  Really?

And, of course, it wouldn't be a Barry “Almighty” speech without taking advantage of the situation to knock around the Republicans to the greatest extent possible.  Barry said, "But what we heard in Cleveland last week wasn’t particularly Republican -- and it sure wasn’t conservative. What we heard was a deeply pessimistic vision of a country where we turn against each other, and turn away from the rest of the world. There were no serious solutions to pressing problems -- just the fanning of resentment, and blame, and anger, and hate."

Meanwhile, outside the convention center during the latest rousing speech from Barry, it was essentially his America that was on full display for all to see.  Or at least all that his many friends in the state-controlled media saw fit to air.  Disgruntled Democrats were busy burning American flags (and sometimes even themselves), cursing Hitlery, breaching the wall around the building (yes, they had a wall), shouting "Black Lives Matter," and condemning white privilege. They considered it their revolution, their new occupy moment.

And Barry, from the safety of a highly-secure podium, spoke as if nothing was wrong.  He said, "That is America. Those bonds of affection; that common creed. We don’t fear the future; we shape it. We embrace it, as one people, stronger together than we are on our own. That’s what Hillary Clinton understands -- this fighter, this stateswoman, this mother and grandmother, this public servant, this patriot -- that’s the America she’s fighting for.”  The truth is that our country is spirally out of controlled and plummeting toward the deck that is rapidly approaching.

And Barry went on to say, "So this year, in this election, I’m asking you to join me -- to reject cynicism and reject fear, and to summon what is best in us; to elect Hillary Clinton as the next president of the United States, and show the world we still believe in the promise of this great nation."  How about we get together and reject the blatant dishonest portrayal of what is actually taking place in this country.  Like our failed economic policy, our failed immigration policy and our failed foreign policy.  We have to be smart enough not to elect Hitlery as our next president.

So at some point during my many trips around the blogosphere that I happened to stumble across someone who suggested to me that I search out Mr. Malcolm Muggeridge.  And it was in so doing that I ended up finding something that after I first read it I found the need to re-read it because it was something that could not have more accurately defined much of what I see every day taking place right before my eyes. And I thought, how profound. It was something written by Mr. Muggeridge and included in his Vintage Muggeridge: Religion and Society. 

And I was so taken by what I was read that I thought it important enough to pass it along to those who, like myself, may be unfamiliar with this man.  We are allowing the destruction of our country to take place and far too many of us have absolutely no desire to even raise a finger.  And we are now on the verge of throwing away that which may very well be our very last opportunity to salvage what’s left of our country.  If we do elect Hitlery we will have totally abandoned our responsibility to future generations.  Mr. Muggeridge’s words, I think, seem almost prophetic. 

Mr. Muggeridge: “So the final conclusion would surely be that whereas other civilizations have been brought down by attacks of barbarians from without, ours had the unique distinction of training its own destroyers at its own educational institutions, and then providing them with facilities for propagating their destructive ideology far and wide, all at the public expense. Thus did Western Man decide to abolish himself, creating his own boredom out of his own affluence, his own vulnerability out of his own strength, his own impotence out of his own erotomania, himself blowing the trumpet that brought the walls of his own city tumbling down, and having convinced himself that he was too numerous, labored with pill and scalpel and syringe to make himself fewer. Until at last, having educated himself into imbecility, and polluted and drugged himself into stupefaction, he keeled over--a weary, battered old brontosaurus--and became extinct.”  

THE BIZARRE STATE OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY…

Well, this week, the Democrats have done what they appeared to be so eager, even determined, to do, officially nominate the battered Hitlery to be the torchbearer of their party for 2016.  She has now finally limped across the finish line. She is tired and, I think it fair to say, much of the country is tired of her.  Sorry, Democrats, no do-overs. You're stuck with her.  Be careful what you wish for.

But it isn't just Hitlery who is so out of touch and in tragic decline. It would seem to be the entire Democrat Party. The American Enterprise Institute reported last week that the Democrat platform is virtually silent when it comes to economic growth.  Maybe that’s because all across the country during the past eight years of Obamanomics, economic growth has been pretty much silent as well.

This is an exaggeration, of course, but not much of one. We have had 2 percent growth under Barry, but that's far from an economy that can in way be considered, in any reasonably way, as one that’s growing. It's sister-kissing growth that, yes, has thankfully kept us out of a recession, but doesn't lead to much, if any, rise in living standards.  What is does is to allow us to simply tread water.

And just as Barry refuses to utter the words "Islamic terrorism," now the whole Democrat Party can't seem to bring itself to endorse "economic growth."  But then, for the left in this country, growth isn't really the goal anyway. What their only goal seems to be, and we know that by listening not only to their candidates for president, but their members of Congress, nothing less than redistribution of wealth.

The language of a party platform doesn't matter much, if at all. But if you're not for growth, then you probably aren't going to produce much of it, just as if you're not even trying to get in shape, it's a good bet you're not going to shed those extra 16 pounds you’re carrying around your middle.  While there has been much talk about supposed ‘economic growth’ over the last eight years, it’s mostly leftist fiction.

Amazingly, the last great growth hawk of the Democrat Party of modern times, John F. Kennedy, ran against Republican Richard Nixon in 1960 on the issue of the "growth deficit." The economy in the 1950s was fairly prosperous, much more so than over the last eight years of Barry. But JFK said we can "do bettah" and convinced Americans we could see much faster wage gains with greater opportunities.

Through tax cuts and free trade, the JFK era sparked growth rates of 4, 5 and even 6 percent in the go-go '60s until LBJ came along and crashed the economy with his “Great Society” welfare statism.  Now we have this weird austerity-worship that has taken over the party. The rich and businesses are portrayed as scalpers and scoundrels. And employers are exploiters in the "you didn't build that" mindset.

Radical environmentalists, now a bedrock constituency of the party, are anti-growth and believe that when people get richer, it's worse for the planet.  They should go live in India or Mexico City and see how well the environment is doing there.  They ridicule what they call "growth-mania" on the right. Human economic activity, they warn, is causing catastrophic global warming.

Perhaps this explains the litany of economic failures during the Obummer years. We have had $8 Trillion of new debt; minimum-wage increases; Obamacare; an $800 Billion stimulus plan (with "shovel-ready" projects); tax increases on the rich; more than $100 Billion in green energy subsidies; auto company and union pension bailouts; re-regulation of the financial industry and banks,

And add to that the fact that we have had a Federal Reserve that has manufactured near zero short-term interest rates for seven years with up to $4 Trillion of bond acquisitions.  All of these were designed primarily to redistribute income, so how can it be a shock to anyone that they haven't produced anything but marginal economic growth?  All that has been done has been done by design.

Poor Hitlery now has the rather unenviable task of persuading Americans to open up wide and swallow four more years of this progressive swill.  Here's the question that Donald Trump and Mike Pence should be asking every day: What would Hitlery offer that is in any way different?  She is promising minimum-wage increases, tax hikes on the rich and more infrastructure spending. This is new? This is change?

The left's defense of growth anemia is that 2 percent growth is now the new normal, so get used to it. Barry's first economic guru, Larry Summers, calls this secular stagnation that is here to stay. But the fact is we could have 4 percent growth easily. A pro-America energy production policy, including putting coal back in business, could produce $150 billion more output each year.

Another yet another percentage point of growth could come from tax reform with reductions in business taxes to spur investment and hiring, that according to the folks at the Tax Foundation.  But Democrat Party is, quite simply, incapable of getting us there, because they aren't even trying. They will celebrate 2 percent growth, the weakest recovery in half a century, as being some glittering achievement.

So the party that once stood with the working class now says Americans have to work more and settle for less. That's not just wrong; it's sad. The Democratic Party long ago abandoned productive people.  Because those who produce are independent, are unwilling to let government completely control their lives, and want reward for exceptional efforts. They don’t ‘need’ the government.

Allowing a growing economy prevents the power that the Democrats so badly crave, and think they deserve, that so badly hampers those that produce.  It's obvious the Democrat platform is bankrupt of anything considered to be helpful, but too much of the media continues to hold the platform high and hide the failures. That's the real problem, and until the media is held as a participant in the failures, little will change.

So, the "Late, Great Democrat Party" will continue to exist, at least until such time as enough Americans wake up to what’s being perpetrated against them.  Which I don’t see happening any time soon.  So the party will continue to harm millions, and as an active, and willing, participant in the destruction of America.  And it will leave very little behind other than a trail of destruction, turning everything it touches into shit.

WHERE ELSE BUT IN THE DEMOCRAT PARTY CAN A RAPIST BE AN ADVOCATE FOR WOMEN…WEIRD…

For those who were able to stomach watching it, last night was ‘Slick Willy’s’ time to shine at the Democrat convention by doing a little bragging on his ‘wife’.  And it’s this morning that he seems to be gathering some rather mixed reviews.  Old Slick delivered a speech that, besides being more than a little too long, has also been described by some as being more than a bit rambling.  And according to some if the point of the speech was to fire up the crowd, despite his reputation as being a great orator, it failed to live up to expectations.

’Slick’ did his best to appear fulsome in his praise of Hitlery, but there was something yuge, that was missing from the speech. ‘Slick’ described Hitlery as the “best darn change-maker” he’d ever met and recounted how he tried three times to get her to marry him.  All in a speech designed, I guess, to use his popularity to somehow ingratiate his wife to those folks who can’t stand her.  He attempted to do so by taking the crowd on a rather weird little journey through the years of their relationship starting in 1971 when he met the girl with big blonde hair and glasses.

There were the years between 1993 and 2001 when he and Hillary made the White House their home.  There was 1997, when daughter Chelsea went off to college, and then, just like that, as if by magic we were suddenly transported to 1999.  But there was one year missing.  A year that it’s probably best not to bring up especially when you’re trying to sell your audience a story of your happy marriage.  In all of ‘Slick’s’ speech, 1998 was completely absent. But why?  Was there nothing of significance that took place in the life of these people?

After all, it was during 1998 that we were witness to a number of rather notable events, such as the New York Yankees ending their season with 125 total victories, the most by any team in 123 years of Major League baseball.  But for the Clintons, it was also their “annus horribilis”.  Because it was in January of that year when website the Drudge Report revealed allegations that White House intern Monica Lewinsky had sex with the then President ‘Slick Willy’.  Later the same month, ‘Slick’ made the now famous denial: “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”. 

It would take until August 1998, and the discovery of Lewinsky’s blue dress replete with his DNA, for ‘Slick’ to finally admit that yes he had indeed had what was then termed as being an “improper physical relationship” with an intern young enough to be his daughter.  It was a scandal that would lead to ‘Slick’ becoming only the second US President to be impeached and charged with a crime, although he would later be found not guilty of obstructing justice and perjury.  No wonder, in his speech, Clinton decided to “fast-forward”, from 1997 to 1999.

Slick gave what as a rather long-winded recitation of I’m sure he sees as being his wife Hitlery’s impressive resume. And to hear him talk you’d think that Hitlery was some sort of a ‘Superwoman’ who singlehandedly rescues literally thousands of women and children.  His speech was supposed to start at 10 PM but, perhaps because of some walker issues, he was a few minutes late getting started.  By 10:30, which is what time I finally threw in the towel, he was only up to1982 in his meandering little fairytale.  I saw very little point in listening any further.

It was amid the meandering autobiography that Slick offered a few attempts to justify his wife on policy.  He said, “She put climate change at the center of our foreign policy.”  I can only assume that he apparently thinks that was a good thing.  He said that there are two Hitlerys: “One is real and the other is made up. You just have to decide which one is which, my fellow Americans.”  He said, “The real one calls you when you’re sick, when your kid’s in trouble, or when there’s a death in the family….earlier today, you nominated the real one.”

‘Slick’ also defended his wife’s carpetbagging in winning the 2000 New York Senate election.  He said, “We’d always intended to go to New York [after he left office]…so she decided to give it a try.”  And he went on to say, “After a tough battle New York elected her to the seat once held by another outsider, Robert Kennedy.”  Perhaps he considers “outsider” another term for “carpetbagger.”  ‘Slick’ said, “Speeches like this are fun,” before finally signing off shortly before 11 PM.  But fun for whom.  After reading most of the reviews this morning, I’m glad I went to bed.

I guess if the purpose of the speech was to, as best as he could, sugarcoat Hitlery’s ‘career in public service’ by leaving out entirely any mention of her real record, then I guess you could say that it was a good speech.  But to be honest, there is virtually no place on God's green earth that is better off today because of anything that she has done. There are 100s of thousands of innocent people who are dead today because of her and Barry. Libya, Iraq, Africa, Russia, Asia, Iran, and countless other places that are far worse off today because of her. 

This speech was, for the most part, completely fact free, quite ridiculous and totally boring. But then as we all know, facts aren’t exactly something that Democrats like to delve too far into, or discuss too far in depth, because the facts rarely, if ever, actually support any of their positions.  ‘Slick Willy’ must have been on oxycodone or some such medication because as much as I despise him, he is usually very good when he gets in front of a microphone.  And what I did hear of it was rambling and for the most part was pretty much incoherent.

There is a time for a woman president, just like there was a time for a first black president, unfortunately America has found out the hard way what it's like to vote for someone simply because of outward appearance, now we have a woman who is nowhere near worthy of the honor to be elected as our president.  America can do so so much better, but that will be some time in the future.  Definitely not now, Hitlery, I fear, would be even worse than Barry.  The bottom line here is that America simply can't survive another Democrat as president, male or female.

HANK JOHNSON, THE PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A DEMOCRAT IN 2016…

There is today in Congress a Democrat who has managed to earn for himself quite the reputation.  A reputation for being little more than a complete moron.  This despite this fact he has been permitted to roam the halls of Congress since 2007.  And it is this same Democrat who, back on March 25, 2010 in a Congressional hearing, actually questioned the military about stationing more troops on the Island of Guam because he was concerned that the island might actually tip over from the weight of those additional troops.  If you didn’t realize that I was talking about Hank Johnson, I won’t hold it against you.  After all the number of imbecilic Democrats in Congress now stands at 236 with 2 others that like to play with them.

Anyway, the only reason I even bring him up is the fact that old Hank has once again gone that extra mile in his effort to remove any and all doubt that he is, without a doubt the most ignorant individual ever to be elected to Congress.  And what is it that he went about doing such a thing?  Well, he recently launched into what can only be described as being a rather bizarre tirade against Israel and its policies toward the "Palestinians", and it was in the process of doing that that he actually went so far as to compare Jewish Israeli settlers in disputed territories to termites.  So I guess I’d be curious to know what it’s going to take for the millions of self-hating Jews we have in this country to stop voting for Democrats.

It was courtesy of the Washington Free Beacon that we came to hear how Hank made his remarks during an event sponsored by something called the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, an anti-Israel, and pro-BDS organization.  For those who may unfamiliar with BDS, what it refers to is the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement, hence the BDS, which is a global campaign attempting to increase economic and political pressure on Israel to comply with the stated goals of the movement: the end of Israel's occupation and colonization.  So knowing what this organization is and what it represents it quickly become very obvious why, being a proud Democrat, how it was that Hank came to be there. 

Hank said, “There has been a steady [stream], almost like termites can get into a residence and eat before you know that you’ve been eaten up and you fall in on yourself, there has been settlement activity that has marched forward with impunity and at an ever increasing rate to the point where it has become alarming.”  And he said, “It has come to the point that occupation, with highways that cut through Palestinian land, with walls that go up, with the inability or the restriction, with the illegality of Palestinians being able to travel on those roads and those roads cutting off Palestinian neighborhoods from each other. And then with the building of walls and the building of check points that restrict movement of Palestinians. We’ve gotten to the point where the thought of a Palestinian homeland gets further and further removed from reality.”

He also stated, demonstrating a historical ignorance that is matched only by his geographical incomprehension, that Jewish people habitually steal land and property from Palestinians.  He said, “You see one home after another being appropriated by Jewish people who come in to claim that land just because somebody did not spend the night there. The home their [Palestinian] ancestors lived in for generations becomes an Israeli home and a flag goes up... the Palestinians are barred from flying flags in their own neighborhoods.”  Hank then went on to compare Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman to Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, a remark which the Free Beacon reports drew vocal agreement from those in the room. 

Hank said, “The fact is the Israeli government, which is the most right-wing government ever to exist in the state of Israel in its history, the most right wing government, you got a guy like Trump who is now the minister of defense in Israel calling the shots on defense."  First of all, how much does anyone think that this moron really knows about the history of Israel?  I betting he doesn’t know any more about Israeli history than he does about American history.  His comments and DNC’s leaked emails prove once and for all that Democrats, as a whole, are really nothing more than a bunch bigoted, racist, anti-Semites who are corrupt beyond belief and supporters of cop killing criminals.

The race-obsessed Johnson, is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus and the Congressional Progressive Caucus, groups that count amongst their members some of the most corrupt and racist individuals in Congress.  And he had also called for the censure of Republican Representative Joe Wilson for shouting “You lie!” at Barry during Barry’s healthcare-related speech to Congress back in 2009, or else “we will have people with white hoods running through the countryside again.”  He also declared that Treyvon Martin, shot in 2012 by George Zimmerman in an incident that ratcheted up racial tensions in this country to the breaking point, had been “executed for WWB in a GC—Walking While Black in a Gated Community.”

In addition, old Hank has also made the idiotic claim that the National Rifle Association’s (NRA's) opposition to gun control stems from racism, he somehow thinks that Barry is the greatest president who ever lived, and that there is "a cultural issue within certain [police] departments... that enables or says it’s okay for law-enforcement officers to shoot to kill blacks, be they male or female, Hispanics—to use excessive force.”  If you’re interested in finding just how much of a waste of skin this guy truly is, feel free to check out a full profile on Hank at the Horowitz Freedom Center's Discover the Networks resource site to learn more.  Cynthia McKinney held this same seat in Congress. This must be the dumbest congressional district in the entire country.

Every time I try to watch this moron my brain hurts for days afterwards. I’m surprised he is a speaker at the Democrat convention this week.  But speaking of termites, Hank, like his buddy Barry, makes friends with the Muslim Brotherhood whose goal it is to undermine American society and destroy her miserable house and bring it down from within. Like termites. A few Jews building homes in their country is a major problem, but millions of migrants and refugees flooding the west and blowing crap up and cutting off heads, shooting and stabbing and mutilating and running people down with rental trucks is no problem.  Hank must have gone to the Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton School of Jew baiting. Its acronym is JACKASS.