I continually find it to be rather amazing how
anyone with any amount of intelligence is able to take New Jersey Senator, and
potential 2020 presidential wannabe, Cory Booker seriously. He revealed much about himself when he told
reporters this past Tuesday that Judge Kavanaugh’s actual guilt or innocence
regarding the allegations being made against him is simply irrelevant to the
question of whether or not President Trump should rescind his nomination and
pick someone else. But is there anyone
that the president could have nominated that Booker and his fellow Democrats
would not have chosen to destroy?
Doubtful. And yet Judge Kavanaugh
has had a distinguished career and he is deserving of this nomination.
Booker told reporters, “My hope is, beyond the
vicious partisan rancor that is going on, beyond the accusations, we don’t lose
sight of what this moral moment is about in this country, and ultimately ask
ourselves the question: is this the right person to sit on the highest court in
the land for a lifetime appointment? When their credibility has been challenged
by intimates, people that knew the candidate well, as a classmate. When his
temperament has been revealed in an emotional moment, where he used language
that, frankly, shocked a lot of us. And then ultimately, not whether he’s
innocent or guilty — this is not a trial — but ultimately, has enough questions
be raised that we should not move on to another candidate?”
And then this moron went on to say, “Ultimately, the
Supreme Court is not an entitlement. Just because you went to Yale or were
president of your class doesn’t entitle you to the Supreme Court. This is a
sacred institution and the people who should be on it — whether you disagree
with their political or judicial philosophy at all — the people who should be
on the Supreme Court should preserve the integrity of the court, and be beyond
the reproach of these difficult partisan times.” And then, as if it would somehow make ANY
difference who it was that the president might have nominated, suggested President
Trump choose someone else from the “long list put together by the Heritage
Foundation and the Federalist Society.”
You know, if Booker were being honest, which we all
know is a pretty rare occurrence for ANY Democrat, he would just admit that
this continuing circus has absolutely nothing at all to do with finding “the
right person to sit on the highest court in the land” and everything to do with
the Left's fear of Judge Kavanaugh’s belief in our Constitution. And it is because of ‘that’ that those on the
Left, including Booker, will manufacture all manner of lie, innuendo or smear
necessary in their effort to satisfy their brain-dead supporters. Democrats don’t care if there is any truth to
these accusations, only that the accusations are being made and then repeated
over and over again until, hopefully, enough people will come to see them as
being true.
This moron asked, "Is this the right person to
sit on the highest court in the land?"
Well, he was confirmed thirteen years ago to sit on the SECOND HIGHEST
court in the land, so I'd say that's a pretty good qualifier. Let’s be real, President Trump could have
nominated the Dalai Lama and the Democrats would be calling him out as a wife
beater, a drunk and a pervert, and for being an elitist, a racist and, just for
good measure, a Nazi. At some point
America is going to need to rid itself of the liberal scum that has nothing to
say. It’s all negative. Our President
just keeps right on winning on everything. I’ve never seen a President in my 66 years
that has done more for the working man than President Trump. Thank you Mr.
President.
Contrary what this imbecile may claim, this ‘IS’ a
trial, and it is only a moron who would think it isn't. They questioned him, they
cross examined him. They then demanded an
investigation by the FBI. That is all
part of a trial. This is not just a job interview and they know it. The only thing Booker was honest about is the
fact that the Democrats will do whatever it takes to stop Judge Kavanaugh, or
any other conservative, from getting on the Supreme Court. And as they have repeatedly shown, there is
absolutely nothing that can be considered as out of bounds or that crosses the line
of common decency. Such is the type of
behavior that has become commonplace for members of the modern day Democrat
Party.
Long before Judge Kavanaugh’s name was placed into
nomination, it was stated by more than a few Democrats, and on more than a few
occasions, that it really didn't matter who it was that President Trump might
chose to nominate, so Booker’s idiotic notion that if someone else were to be
chosen from some previously mentioned “long list” they would not, necessarily,
be made to run the same gauntlet as Judge Kavanaugh is just as bogus as was his
self-described ‘Spartacus moment.’ I’m
quite confident that everyone has known all along that Democrats were never
going to vote for this nominee, or for any other Trump nominee. To believe anything else one would had to
have spent the last two years living under a rock.
This has been the tactic all along. To find some way, any way, that would allow
the Democrats to delay the process for as long as possible and to raise as many
doubts as possible, all in the effort to convince the nominee himself, or the
President, to withdraw the nomination. And
if able to achieve such a thing it would result in what would most certainly be
a Democrat win. I would like to hope
that every Republican senator, including those RINOs in question, will come to
understand what’s really being attempted here and vote accordingly, just as the
rest of us will come November’s elections. Any Republican who votes against Kavanaugh's
confirmation needs to be defeated and sent back to where they came from.
No comments:
Post a Comment