DEMOCRATS CONTINUE WITH THEIR EFFORTS TO DISARM LAW-ABIDING AMERCIANS…

Democrats have long been very determined in their attempt to limit to the greatest extent possible, or to eliminate entirely, the right of law-abiding Americans to keep and bear arms as our Constitution so eloquently spells out. And there seems to be nothing that they will not do in attempting to achieve that goal. To the point where Democrats seem quite willing to create ways of increasing any potential body count from gun violence in the hope that if they can only get it high enough, they’ll be able to convince enough Americans that it’s guns that are the real problem. Democrats seem to go out of their way to increase the odds of ‘mass shootings’ taking place.

Democrats love to tout the fact that they’ve somehow made our schools safer by making them “gun free zones,” when actually all they’ve done was to make our schools the softest of soft targets. I would suggest that we make the U.S. Capitol a “gun free zone.” Democrats also encourage gun violence by their continuing stance of being soft on crime, and what appears to be their blatant refusal to enforce any of the numerous gun laws that are already on the books. Instead, they call for more and far stricter gun laws that have done absolutely nothing to address the issue of gun violence. As proof I suggest the one look at any Democrat controlled city or state.

And it’s Democrats that are always quick to exploit any tragedy while choosing to ignore any actual facts and immediately call for more gun control. And it was just this past Monday, during the broadcast of CNN’s “AC360,” that we had another Democrat sounding the alarm. This time it was Mark Kelly, former astronaut, current U.S. Senator and well-known traitor, who acknowledged that we don’t really know anything about the Brown University shooter, including the kind of weapons he used or how those weapons were obtained, and “those details do matter, to some extent, but we know how this works, places that have stronger gun laws have less gun violence."

Kelly said, “[T]he thing that now goes through my mind every time I hear about one of these things is just how horribly have members of Congress and administrations failed young people in this country. These kids who grow up having to do practice for mass shootings, and many of them experience them themselves in real lockdowns. And, in this case, we have a kid that was shot herself in high school and now is involved in this mass shooting at Brown University. So, Washington, D.C. and state legislatures have clearly failed the American people.” Gun control, speech control, it’s all about control with these Democrats like this clown who’s nothing but a pathetic traitor.

Host Anderson Cooper then asked, “We don’t really know anything about this shooter, nor the kind of weapon or weapons he used. How much would that information guide next steps in Rhode Island, potentially nationwide?” Kelly answered, “Well, it’s all going to be part of the investigation. And those details do matter, to some extent, but we pretty much know how this works, Anderson. Places that have stronger gun laws have less gun violence. If you look around the country, that’s very clear. And countries that have stronger gun laws than the United States have significantly lower rates of gun violence.” Look, when it comes to Democrats the details never really matter.

All that matters is that they get to use every tragedy to advance their control. Anyway, Kelly went on to say, “You travel anywhere in Europe or Asia, you ask anybody if they know anybody who’s ever been shot, and it’s really, really hard to find somebody. You ask that question in the United States, and my experience has been, if I’ve got a room full of people, I ask if anybody knows somebody who’s been shot, it’s about 50%, consistently.” Fifty percent? Give me a break. Shall not be infringed. That’s not so I can have a gun, it’s so if I want one, the government has no say over it. You’re a smart guy, Kelly. Read the Constitution. It’s right there in black and white.

Until quite recently, Kelly has spent the majority of his time in office keeping quiet and cheerfully rubberstamping the leftist agenda. Kelly also swore we needed new laws to fix the immigration invasion but as everyone can see we simply needed a new president, one that wasn’t a Democrat. But now that he needs to get re-elected, he wants to be on the news circuit. Clearly, he’s not fit to be in public office and should be shown the Senate door. Kelly needs to be in prison for his sedition, not out preaching about more gun control. Why are Democrats so desperate to disarm the American people? Just what might it be that they have in mind for the rest of us?

Some may recall how it was a few years back that Democrat Ed Rendell said the quiet part out loud when describing another school shooting, one in Newtown, Connecticut. What he essentially said was that the more horrific the tragedy the better it would be for those wanting stricter gun laws in being able to make their case. Rendell stated, “The good thing about Newtown is it was so horrific that, I think, it galvanized Americans to a point where the intensity on our side is going to match...” Democrats have absolutely no problem with putting Americans in harm’s way if in the end and resulting casualties can be used to advance their leftist political agenda.

When it comes to such tragedies their first response is always the most stupid one. It shows how the Democrats really have nothing to add, or to take away, to the problem of gun violence. Always we must disarm the innocent citizen populace and leave the criminals alone. Just take guns away, and poof it all just works. Kelly should be immediately removed from office. His job is to defend our Bill of Rights, not trying to take them away. Our Constitution was written to define what the government cannot do. Infringing on our natural, God given, not government given, rights to keep and bear arms is NOT permitted. Kelly must be removed, he’s a disgrace.

Look, no matter how you feel about firearms, you must not believe what it is that the Democrats, or those in the ‘fake news’ media tell you. You must educate yourself with the historical truths of disarmed populations. Throughout human history one segment of society has murdered more of its own people and their neighbors than any other. That would be the government, no matter the form. What we need to do is to put criminals in prisons, the mentally ill in asylums, illegal immigrant on planes back to their country of origin and God back into our schools. But Democrats don’t want to hear any of that because it makes it more difficult to accomplish their end goal.

So according to this idiot Kelly, because a criminal chooses to ignore the law that supposedly forbids them from entering a gun free zone, that somehow equates to us needing more gun control for law-abiding citizens. That makes absolutely zero sense. Gun control is a loser. Instead, what we do need is more gun rights, so that people can defend themselves from those who are never going to abide by our laws in the first place. Of course, it’s no shock that Kelly is pushing for more gun control without any real knowledge on the details, since he is married to a gun control zealot who always politicizes every shooting to say that we need more gun control.

No matter how strict gun control laws are, bad people will always get guns and commit evil acts. Democrats promised tighter gun control and “gun free zones” would reduce the number of gun deaths and eliminate mass shootings. To be generous they were simply mistaken. If one truly wants to solve a problem, and one’s attempts to do so fail somewhat miserably, the right decision is to try something different, not to continue with those things that have failed. Which means that Democrats are either stupid OR they do not want to solve the problem. They simply want to use it to be better able to control people and as the first step in totally disarming them.

And I’m curious, just what laws would those like Kelly pass that would stop these shootings? I mean there’s already laws against murder. There’s already a law against bringing a gun on Brown’s campus. And this shooting occurred in one of the most gun restrictive states in the country. And look at happened in Australia. From what I’ve read about their gun laws, they are very restrictive unless you happen to be a Moslem. If the country cannot control the flow of narcotics in and out of it, the country will not be able to prevent firearms from getting into the wrong hands. All it will do is prevent law-abiding people from possessing them, and that is the goal.

And finally, I wouldn’t doubt that Kelly, along with wife Gabby Giffords, likely have an ulterior motive for calling for more gun control as I’m sure both are laughing all the way to the bank courtesy of their foundation/group/401c3 that supports gun control. Anything that keeps their faces in the news keeps the donations rolling in. It brings in millions of dollars every year and provides them each a seven-figure salary every year for running it. The foundation also pays for all their homes, their travel, lodging, vacations and all their personal expenses. As long as that gravy train keeps going, they are not likely to stop campaigning for gun control/confiscation any time soon.