Ok, I just don’t get it. Do we on the right want Romney to win, or not? Why is it that wherever I seem to turn I’m hearing more and more from those on our side who seem to be so determined to undermine his campaign, going so far as to actually join with the state-controlled media in that endeavor. Imagine my surprise when that awful Mitt Romney, just a few minutes before the White House itself disavowed the Cairo Embassy apologizing for free speech, rightfully condemned the appeasing statement in no uncertain terms. And as a result, and nearly all day long, our corrupt state-controlled media went on what can only be described as a rampage to make Romney pay for the unpardonable sin of actually criticizing Barry “Almighty”. But there was nearly just as much condemnation coming from those on our side. Words like, “the worst campaign I’ve seen in my lifetime,” or that Romney had made some horrific gaffe and came across looking like an opportunist. More of an opportunist than Barry?
Because, after all, throughout our political history there is no precedent, whatsoever, for a political opponent immediately criticizing a sitting president after a foreign policy crisis. Right? Well that’s apparently what many would have us believe, even many who I thought were supposed to be on our side. So with the entire corrupt media institution immediately set into action to very busily begin to circling the wagons around their hero, Barry. And in what I think is a futile attempt to rescue him from his own foreign policy blunders, we have CBS News riding to the rescue in order to give Barry an out. And what does our pathetic president do with the opportunity provided to him? He chooses to condemn Romey even before he condemns these murdering terrorists, taking the opportunity to further politicize this tragedy saying, “There's a broader lesson to be learned here. Governor Romney seems to have a tendency to shoot first and aim later.” Yes, that's our President “Acted Stupidly” talking about spouting off too quickly.
But Barry is right about one thing, Romney is guilty as charged. Because Romney did shoot first to defend the principles of free speech that the people who work for Barry in Cairo were so eager to fritter away. Yes, that damn Mitt Romney saw this outrageous example of cowering in the face of terror coming from American officials and chose to immediately spoke out against it. For those of you who may not have heard the statement AMERICAN officials in Cairo released, here it is: “The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.”
I don’t know about you, but hat doesn’t sound very American to me. Not at all! But things would proceed to only get worse. Not long after this limp-wristed apology sympathizing with the worst kind of intolerance was issued, this very same embassy was then attacked by the very same murdering Islamist thugs who were supposed to be the recipients of the above mentioned apology. But after the attack, and quite incredibly, the embassy felt it necessary to release yet a statement standing by the original apology! This is the kind of weak-kneed, bow and scrape weakness that invites aggression, and Romney didn't need 10 hours, like the White House did, to finally state that nothing justifies these attacks or any kind of violence or any kind of infringement on free speech. Romney acted decisively and stood up immediately as Barry, once again, dithered in front of the entire world. So, yes, Romney shot first without aiming because he doesn't need 10 hours to aim when it comes to standing up to Islamists and standing for freedom of speech.
No comments:
Post a Comment