DESPITE RECENT WINS, DEMOCRATS REMAIN IN THE CELLAR…

Now the last thing I want is to be accused of raining on anyone’s parade, or for bringing someone down especially when I know there is now much celebrating going on within the Democrat Party since they finally succeeded in winning some elections after picking up the governorships in both Virginia and New Jersey.  It’s just that I remember all of the euphoria among Democrats that had as its source the election of one Barry Obummer in 2008 as president, and how it was said at the time that with his election would come 40 years of solid Democrat rule.  And I also remember all of the anger and frustration when that 40 year estimate didn’t quite pan out for them.  Mainly because Democrats tried to move us too far to the left a little too quickly.    

What I’d like to do here is to focus on those recent electoral victories, the two governorships I mentioned.  You see, I would argue that Democrats are far from being able to take much credit for their victories.  And it is instead of taking credit that the Democrats should now be thanking the Republicans for their continued stubbornness when it comes to their refusing to support our Republican president and his agenda.  And not until those responsible for advancing the president’s agenda begin to do so, and more aggressively, and those running for office under the Republican banner choose to enthusiastically support our president will there be any progress made in bringing an abrupt end to the Democrats’ dreams of becoming the majority party.  

But it is my little way of bringing the Democrats back to Earth that I would simply like to point to a recent poll that seems to show that the Democrat Party is at its lowest approval rating in 25 years.  This despite the never-ending, and very negative, coverage of the president by our state-controlled news media that has continued to wage, since election night 2016, a war to not only destroy Donald Trump’s presidency, but to destroy the man himself.  And it’s despite the best efforts by their media cohorts that favorable views of the Democrat Party are shockingly low, according to a new poll that was conducted for the Crappy News Network (CNN).  The party’s favorable ratings have tumbled from 44 percent to only 37 percent just since March.

According to this same poll 54 percent reported having an unfavorable view of the party. This is the party’s lowest point since the 1990s, also according to the poll.  And what may be alarmingly for the party, the numbers are falling even among the key demographics of nonwhites (48 percent) and those under 35 years of age (33 percent).  In addition, 33 percent of respondents who called themselves liberals had a negative view of the Democrat Party.  Also, 42 percent of those who said they were independents disapprove of the party.  And it would seem that the Democrats, recent electoral victories notwithstanding, may be too focused on the short term when perhaps they should be focused more on what may be their long term problem.

I’m just curious, but has anyone else ever happened to notice how it is that every time the Democrat Party flies into the deck there's always a Clinton to be found somewhere near the controls?  It was 25 years ago that they had ‘Slick Willy’ at the top of the party, and the Republicans took the House and the Senate. Then they pulled the usual bone head move and ran Dole, because it was his turn.  This time, it was Hitlery, who purchased the DNC with Uranium One money.  Fortunately, the Republican didn't run JEB, even though it was his turn and the people elected Trump.  But, once again, the Republicans are on the verge of squandering yet another opportunity to move the ball because of a couple of RINOs, McConnell and Ryan. 

Democrats include many communists who, while they might not like the word, support the full set of communist beliefs.  Police officers across the country are still being murdered because the Democrat leaders support the murder of police officers.  The Democrat leaders of 2017 support and defend criminals and terrorists, not law-abiding citizens or police.  We who might describe ourselves as, "Reagan Republicans" must be true to America, to Americans, to the United States Constitution, and to the Rule of Law.  We, who are honest American citizens, are being viciously attacked by evil people inside America and out.  If we stay true to Trump's campaign promises and continue to support his “Make America Great Again” agenda, the Democrats will fail.

That’s because Democrats in 2017 are very happy to support the notion that all 206 million white Americans are all racists and are somehow guilty of owning slaves and supporting slavery, even though none of their ancestors arrived here much later.  Also, if you are a Democrat, white people are not allowed to express political opinions or to even have an opinion, unless they follow the political doctrines of Communism, Islam, and anti-Americanism.  And, oddly enough, if you’re a Democrat you see all police as being criminals and all criminals as being honest.  And one party rule, as long as it’s the Democrats, with zero checks and balances, is wonderful because Democrats are perfect and free from sin and the biases that other people have.

Also, if you happen to be a Democrat, you’re likely to view the United States Constitution as being nothing more than a bunch of words written on a piece of paper and as something that doesn’t really matter.  Being “fair”, according to the subjective opinion of liberal activist judges, is the only thing that matters.  It is the responsibility of those same activist judges to essentially re-write the Constitution, whenever needed, in order to correct the mistakes made in policy and philosophy by past elected officials.  Democrats typically view themselves as being far superior in every way to those of us who are non-Democrats, especially intellectually, and they think that non-Democrats don’t even deserve to vote or to have an opinion.

Also it’s Democrats who seem to be of the opinion that five-year-old children should be encouraged to have sex-change operations and to suspend all reality regarding the biology they were born with.  Also they support the notion that women must accept men with lipstick gazing at them in the women’s restroom and that young girls must accept grown men with lipstick and testosterone-supercharged teenage boys showering with the girls and gazing at them in the locker rooms and bathrooms. Women and girls who oppose being humiliated and endangered are bad people who discriminate.  And it also seems to be a great many of those in the Democrat Party who think women must come to accept Sharia Law and the enslavement by Islam.

And it’s the vast majority of Democrats who seem to view the United States not as an independent country, but instead as a ‘sanctuary’ dumping ground with no borders and open to absolutely ANYONE who desires to come here.  And then there’s the issue of what the Democrats like to refer to as “science.”   Only in this sense, ‘science’ is whatever it is that supports the political goals held by Democrats.  Suspending reality and evidence is perfectly acceptable “science”, as long as it supports the goals of the Democrat Party or any of the many front groups that fall under the party’s umbrella. “Science” is defined by calling people with a penis “women” and by calling cooling temperatures “global warming, climate change or climate disruption”.

And if you’re a Democrat you believe that all immigrants are good, especially the illegal ones and all American citizens are, for the most part, bad.  All monuments and history that involves what white people did in North America must be erased. A new man must be created for the new Communist Utopia, absent of any memory of anything from the past, except for bad things America, Americans, or white people may have done.  Post-century convictions are acceptable, where 21st Century liberals condemn and retroactively punish people who lived hundreds of years ago, and their descendants.  And then, there’s the question of abortion.  Democrats support aborting perfectly healthy babies right up to the time of delivery and for any reason.

So there you have it, what the Democrat Party of 2017 supports and, I assume, what those who vote for Democrats must also support.  If not why, regardless of one’s skin color or ethnic background, would anyone vote for a Democrat?  If you support nothing that the Democrat Party stands for, what is it about one’s race or ethnicity that convinces one to vote for a Democrat?  Nothing!  So I can only assume that the vast majority of those in our minority communities must agree with the positions held by the Democrat Party when it comes to such things as abortion, men being allowed in women’s restroom and the continuing to allow into this country massive numbers of illegal immigrants.  Minorities have been brainwashed into hating our country.

And remember that most candidates running under the Democrat banner tend not to be very forthcoming when asked about the specifics regarding the issues that they truly do support.  Therefore it’s never a good idea for one to take at face value anything a candidate may say before an election.  Voters should always take the time to do the necessary homework, to look back at the candidate’s history and to look at exactly who their candidate has supported and at who it was that they were willing to betray and sacrifice for the sake of advancing the left’s agenda.  And while Democrats are thumping their chests this morning just because they won a couple of elections, they're crowing about nothing more than winning a couple of liberal states.

And while I’m sure you’ll not find a Democrat anywhere who will agree, I still argue that all their party needs in order to bring about its total and complete collapse, is a just little push in the right direction.  If only those on our side had the necessary courage to do so.  But they’re far too busy spending time worrying about how they’re going to being able to keep their cushy job, than they are worrying about the survival of our country.  And it is they who need to be replaced not with Democrats, heaven forbid, but with those willing to support our president in his efforts to “Make America Great Again.”  The truth is, if you vote Democrat then you vote for Socialism.  And that will lead nowhere but to a dead end for both America and ALL of her people.

OBAMA SLITHERS TO THE SURFACE TO MAKE ANOTHER PLEA FOR GUN CONTROL…

He who so very easily, and quite completely, replaced Jimmy Carter as being the worst president this country has ever had the misfortune to elect, once again recently slinked, or is it slunked, from his home in the sewer to once again attempt to sell to the American people on what was essentially nothing more than his typical brand of political snake oil!  And of course I’m sure everyone has already guessed who it is of whom I speak, none other than Barry Obummer.  The man who is most responsible for the fact that America now finds itself engulfed in a level toxic hate never before seen.  Obummer’s true legacy are the terrorist organizations that essentially he created, ones like BLM and Antifa.

It was ex-president Obummer who in his continuing effort to never let a crisis, or in this instance a tragedy, go to waste, used the recent Texas church shooting that left 26 people dead on Sunday to once again call for stricter gun control.  He said that Americans should ask God for “the wisdom to ask what concrete steps we can take to reduce the violence and weaponry in our midst.”  It was on Twitter that Obummer said, “We grieve with all the families in Sutherland Springs harmed by this act of hatred, and we’ll stand with the survivors as they recover.”  Adding “May God also grant all of us the wisdom to ask what concrete steps we can take to reduce the violence and weaponry in our midst.”

Obummer, has continued to take an unusually active role during his successor’s administration, and even George W. Bush has now seen fit to offer criticism of his own when it comes our current president despite the fact that he never uttered so much as a single word of criticism of his successor, but, I suppose, that would be a discussion to have on another day.  As far as Obummers remarks regarding this most recent tragedy, he, as to be expected, offered no specific details on what those steps to reduce the guns “in our midst” might look like.  In reality, as far as Obummer is concerned this shooting was likely seen as being nothing more than an opportunity to exploit, to be used to insert himself into the conversation.

Sunday’s shooting, carried out by 26-year-old Devin Patrick Kelley, was the worst mass shooting in Texas history.  And also to be expected, nowhere in Barry’s politicized assessment of this tragedy was there any mention of the fact that had there been just one parishioner in the possession of a gun, just one, we would not today be talking about how 26 people here gunned down in a Texas church.  As it was a local gun owner that’s reported to have opened fire on Kelley with a rifle, preventing him from taking any more lives.  Obummer’s reaction to Sunday’s massacre was significantly more political than was President Trump’s.  That would be because with Obummer is must always be about politics, all the time.

But I really don’t see a need not pay any attention to Obummer.  He sees this as an opportunity to connect with those who reside at his end of the political spectrum.  And while there are those who will no doubt pay some level of attention to him when he speaks on this topic, few are going to take him seriously when it comes to tax policy, defense policy, foreign policy or even healthcare policy.  So he must take advantage of every opportunity, no matter how gruesome, to gain for himself some level of attention for himself.  Barry love nothing more than the spotlight, and these 26 dead in Texas is an opportunity for him to once again take center stage in an effort to get as much attention as possible focused on him. 

This call for “fewer guns” may sound like a great idea to those on the left, especially at moments such as this, but to those of us with a brain such claims are seen as being nothing more than attempts to exploit a tragedy all in the effort to advance one’s kooky, and more than a little dangerous, political agenda.  Fewer guns would not have kept this or any other mass shooting from taking place.  Because just like those tragedies where a truck or a knife is used, it’s not the guns, it’s the people using their preferred weapon of choice.  You see the problem is not fewer guns, it’s fewer criminals.  If we can't control them and their crimes how in the Hell are we going to control their non-compliance with our already existing gun laws?

Obummer, like our other current ex-presidents, has the privilege of being constantly surrounded by a taxpayer funded security team for the rest of his life, and to have his family protected against home invasion with fences, Secret Service agents with “assault-style” weapons with “high capacity” magazines, and yet he has the gall to seek to deprive you and me of the same ability to do all that we can to protect ourselves and our loved ones from those who wish to do us harm.  He advocates against law abiding gun owners being able to own a gun and to defend themselves against those that he remains in favor of allowing to flood into our country courtesy of our very porous southern border.  A border that he did nothing to secure. 

Oddly enough my gun has never once jumped out of my car or left my house and shot anyone!  What exactly is “reasonable gun control” anyway?  There already are numerous reasonable gun laws on the books.  It’s not just about keeping guns out of the hands of those who would harm others intentionally, no gun control can do that.  What would follow “reasonable gun control” would likely be the eventual disarmament of those who use guns reasonably, so that we all become targets of those who use guns unreasonably.  Moreover, we all would be victims of the government in an additional way. The first thing Hitler did, upon gaining office, was to disarm the German citizenry.  And we know what happened next.

There is one thing for sure. That as long as we continue to have tragedies such as this most recent shooting in Texas, we will also be forced to contend not only with the Democrats, but also their many minions in the state-controlled media, regarding their continued calls for more and restrictive forms of gun control.  But we should never allow ourselves to be convinced that those calls have anything whatsoever to do with public safety or loss of life.  Because just like their justification for Obamacare had absolutely nothing to do with making sure every single American would be able to obtain cost effective health insurance, their calls for stricter gun control have nothing to do with reducing gun violence or the number of mass shootings. 

Because the common denominator that can be so easily recognized regarding both of these two liberal causes is that they both have to do with one thing, and one thing only.  And that one thing is, of course, that they are both seen as being far more efficient and effective methods of providing the government with a much better means of controlling the populace.  And that’s what this is really all about, it’s what it has always been all about.  You’d have to be pretty stupid to think that the Democrats genuinely care whether or not people are able to obtain health insurance or have any desire whatsoever to reduce gun violence.  These things are nothing more than unscrupulous means to what can only be called a diabolical end.     

WHEN DEMOCRATS EAT THEIR OWN…

Has anyone else noticed how it is that so many of those in the state-controlled ‘fake news’ media complex continue to spend so much of their time promoting the notion that the Republican Party now seems to be involved in what so many of them very enthusiastically describe as being a ‘civil war’, and yet never utter not so much as a word about how it is that Barry succeeded in essentially destroying the Democrat Party and how Hitlery, after seizing control, succeeded in driving what was left of it into the ground.  Personally, it couldn't have happened to a more deserving bunch of scumbags.  I love it when Democrats eat their own.

And I guess I’m more than a little confused about how it is that after more than a year the Democrats are just now finally willing to admit that President Trump has been right all along when he said that the Democrat Party primary process was totally rigged in Hitlery’s favor.  And it was one of Hitlery’s more vocal supporters during the 2016 campaign, Elizabeth Warren, who during Thursday’s episode of the Crappy News Network’s, “The Lead,” said that she now believes that the Democrat primary was rigged.  What the Hell took her so long?  She sure didn’t think that was the case when she was going after Trump for claiming the same thing over a year ago.

Anyway, it was old Liz who said, “Look, this is a real problem, but what we’ve got to do as Democrats now, is we’ve got to hold this party accountable. When…Tom Perez was first elected chair of the DNC, the very first conversation I had with him is to say, you have got to put together a Democratic Party in which everybody can have confidence that the party is working for Democrats, rather than Democrats are working for the party. And he’s being tested now. This is a test for Tom Perez.”  Anchor Jake Tapper then asked Warren, “[D]o you agree with the notion that it was rigged?”  She responded, “Yes.”  So what might have caused this new realization?

And you would think that after eight long years of having the most corrupt and lawless president ever, things were bound to come out eventually. There are still too many people who can't see past his color and are afraid to call it as they see it for fear of being called a racist.  Good grief, his color is precisely why he was chosen by the Democrat power structure in the first place and then put on the fast-track for the presidency. They knew he would get the benefit of the doubt precisely because of his color.  And despite all that he has done to “fundamentally transform” America, what seems to have gone ignored is how drastically he changed the Democrat Party.

And this same man is STILL receiving the benefit of the doubt from far too many Americans.  It's ridiculous.  More people need to get over their supposed white guilt!  After all, we have a country to save.  Obummer is still very much engaged in American politics and he is one sick, I mean slick, operator.  Barry didn't simply destroy the Democrat Party, his goal was, and remains, to bring about the downfall of this Constitutional Republic.  The fact that he still is free, and even getting a nice fat pension, is bad enough but he and his financial backer, George Soros, are still working toward that goal and most American citizens don't realize he's still at it.

So old Liz says that “you have got to put together a Democratic Party in which everybody can have confidence that the party is working for Democrats.”  But oddly enough it was the same old Liz who was singing a very different tune in October of last year.  You see, it was then that she held nothing back in attacking then candidate Trump for his declaring that the election was rigged.  It was before the election that Liz tweeted, “It’s not rigged, @realDonaldTrump. You’re losing fair & square. Put on your big-boy pants because this is what accountability looks like.”  So now over a year later it’s Liz who seems to agree with President Trump’s assessment.

And it’s to Liz that I would like to pass on that I think the Democrat Party of 2017 is working just fine for the Democrats, especially as it continues to support everything that seems to matter most to those who identify as Democrats.  Such as: How many men can you get in a women's restroom, and vice versa, the incendiary hate President Trump rhetoric heard from ‘Mad Maxine’ Waters and the like, the advocating for ‘free’ stuff, amnesty for illegal aliens and sanctuary cities, the silencing of any and all dissenting opinions, and of course the supporting of violence as a means to an end.  Please don't change a thing, continue to support your base just as you've been doing.

I think we can say that Democrats are furious that sunlight is finally beginning to expose what is just the tip of a rather sizable iceberg regarding their 2016 election shenanigans.  Hitlery, too, is furious that WikiLeaks exposed her lies, cheating, corruption and election fraud.  DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wizzerman Schultz was forced to resign after it was discovered that she was in cahoots with Hitlery to damage Bernie’s campaign.  Interim DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile was fired from the Crappy News Network and was pressured to resign as acting DNC chairwoman after it was discovered she provided Hitlery with answers to debate questions.

Hitlery is also known to have paid a couple of Democrat ‘operatives’, by the names of  Scott Foval and Robert Creamer, to instigate violence at Trump rallies on behalf of her campaign and the DNC.  Later is was discovered that Robert Creamer had visited the White House over 340 times.  Of those visits, 47 resulted in direct meetings with none other than ex-president Barry Obummer.  Hitlery also hired voter fraud activist Scott Foval, a loyal Democrat ‘activist’ who told undercover investigators that his party has been rigging elections “for 50 years” and wasn’t likely to stop now.  Foval was forced to resign after this little bit of information came to light.

And let’s not forget that it was the state-controlled media, and nearly in its entirety, that proved itself to be an instrumental member of Hitlery’s campaign because of its blatant attempt to try to influence both the primary and general elections.  But by insisting to push polls that they had to have known had no basis in really, it was in the end that they had actually succeeded in doing more damage than anything else.  And now it’s become rather curious to watch the Democrats as they wail about Russian spies using WikiLeaks to influence the election, when it’s clear the liberal state-controlled media was colluding with Hitlery & Co. nearly every step of the way. 

The list of laws that were either bent considerably or broken outright all in the effort to keep Hitlery in the game, would like stretch to the Moon and back.  Had she been anyone else her candidacy would have come to screeching halt as soon as the email server story broke, but the Democrats incorrectly believed they had sufficient control of the media to be able to insulate her from the fallout of those astounding revelations.  The politicized Obummer Justice Department did Democrats no favors by staving off indictments that would have taken Hitlery out of the game, or by slow-walking the email investigation until her replacement became prohibitively difficult.

We’re now told that Hitlery seized control of the DNC’s assets and resources four months after announcing her run and then proceeded to rig the primaries.  Yet, even though she had the media providing cover for her, Twitter and Facebook both covering for her by blocking conservative trending topics and hiding critical trending hashtags, Bob Creamer and Scott Foval hiring leftists to attack Trump rallies and physically assault his supporters, and paid for a spurious dossier that tied Trump with Russian collusion, even with all of that going for her, she STILL LOST.  If that doesn’t make very clear the fact that she was a horrible candidate, nothing will.

No matter how much Democrats complain and try to distance themselves from Hitlery, the old Democrat Party has now gone the way of the dinosaur. The new Democrat Party nominated this crook to be president and for that it must never be forgiven.  But there’s no doubt that come 2020 the Democrats will again trot out yet another Communist-Socialist-One World-Multiculturalist whose mission again will be to try to destroy America with their dreams of fairness, equality and a utopia that only exists within their pea sized brains.  Biden, Warren, Harris, etc. are all lining up for 2020, and they still have Hitlery out there saying she wants to be president.

Finally, if it wasn't for being misled the Democrats wouldn't have any “leadership” at all. The Democrat Party used to be better than this.  But for 50+ years they have been misled and lied to by communist insurgents pretending to be Democrats.  Today’s Democrat Party is the party of hate and of anti-America sentiment.  The party has been overrun by communist sympathizers, of Islamists, of anarchists, of criminals who flaunt our legal system to get rich and those who are evil and corrupt to the core.  Show me a Democrat who is proud of America, and I'll tell you about a creature that doesn't exist anymore.  The Democrat Party has become the greatest threat we face.

HITLERY, LIVING PROOF THAT LIBERALISM TRULY IS A MENTAL DISORDER…

The mind of a Democrat is something that is both truly unique and a bit baffling to behold.  Because it seems to allow a person to see themselves as being totally incapable of doing any wrong, while at the same time allowing them to think that they always have the absolute best solution to any problem no matter how complex that problem may be.  Which often makes them appear to the rest of as being more than a little delusional.  Liberalism has often times been described as being a mental disorder, and there is a mountain of evidence that would seem to indicate that that is in fact the case.  And there is really no one who makes for a better case study for such an argument than, Hitlery. 

Because it is with Hitlery that we have been provided with someone who can only be described as being, at least, narcissistic and at most, terminally psychotic.  She accuses the Trump campaign, and even the candidate himself, of colluding with the Russians, and yet she has no problem whatsoever when it comes to being able to go on television, as she did this past Wednesday night, and defend her own campaign’s funding of the so-called Trump dossier, even though the allegations in the document remain almost entirely uncorroborated.  In an interview with Trevor Noah of “The Daily Show,” Hitlery noted that the dossier, commissioned by opposition research firm Fusion GPS, is “still being evaluated.”

And it was in speaking about this dossier, that Hitlery said, “It’s part of what happens in a campaign where you get information that may or may not be useful and you try to make sure that anything you put in the public arena is accurate.”  The dossier was written by former British spy Christopher Steele.  It was revealed last week that Hitlery campaign lawyer Marc Elias hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) last April to investigate Trump.  Fusion hired Christopher Steele that June, and the ex-MI6 officer would go on to produce a research report now known as, “the dossier.”  Which was nothing more than a work of complete fiction.

And it was during her ‘interview’ with this boob Noah, that Hitlery made sure to mention how it was that Fusion GPS’s first client was a Republican donor who was very opposed Trump’s candidacy.  The ‘Washington Free Beacon’, a conservative website funded by Republican billionaire Paul Singer, recently came forward to identify itself as being Fusion’s first anti-Trump client.  The site hired Fusion in October 2015 and ended its research of Trump the following May.  And it should come as a surprise to no one that Hitlery failed to note that The Free Beacon had no involvement with the ‘dossier.’  But then since she's lied so much in her life I doubt she even knows what the truth is anymore.

Hitlery said, “This was research started by a Republican donor during the Republican primary, and then when Trump got the nomination for the Republican Party, the people doing it came to my campaign lawyer and said, ‘Would you like us to continue it?’”  And it was in speaking about Mr. Elias that Hitlery said, “He said yes.  He’s an experienced lawyer. He knows what the law is. He knows what opposition research is.”  While Mr. Elias might know what the law is, it was Hitlery and her campaign that apparently chose not to bother with following that law even though they chose to pay this gentlemen, Mr. Elias, significant amounts of money to keep her abreast of what that law very clearly said. 

And it was during the same little exchange between these two leftwing kooks that Hitlery also made sure to allow herself sufficient time to take the opportunity to criticize President Trump’s response to the recent terrorist attack in New York City by saying the president shouldn’t “point fingers,” or set people against each other and argued Trump “doesn’t have any empathy.”  Hitlery said, “Well, it’s so disappointing, Trevor. Because, you know, I was a senator from New York on 9/11. I was with President Obama through a lot of difficult decisions as his secretary of state. I obviously, saw my husband responding to tragedies, attacks, the Oklahoma City bombing.”  Hitlery, the ‘Queen of Empathy.’

And of course she went on to say, “And what you want in a president is what I think the three men I just mentioned delivered, and that is trying to bring the country together, talk about what happened with the event that they are concerned about, but not to point fingers, not to scapegoat, not to try to set Americans against each other. And, unfortunately, that just is not part of the job that our current president accepts or is willing to perform. You know, of course he can have his own point of view and push his policies. That goes with the job. But not to continue to divide Americans against each other. So, he just doesn’t have any empathy.”  So I ask you, who’s more divisive than Hitlery?

And then Hitlery said, “And you can disagree with somebody over all kinds of partisan issues, but you want to have a president who can try to put himself into the shoes, the feelings of somebody else. And he has not been able to do that.”  Oh I don’t know, President Trump has been made to face those whose lives were forever changed by hurricanes as well as the family members of those who died at the hand of a madman, and has displayed far more empathy than I would have ever expected to see from Hitlery, had she been placed in similar situations.  How empathetic was Hitlery when she looked the family members of those men whom she allowed to be murdered in Benghazi in the eye, and lied?  

Hitlery has repeatedly demonstrated that she is totally incapable of accepting responsibility for anything as she continues to live in denial, admits to wanting to make voodoo dolls of those critical of her, thinks so little of woman that she expected them to vote for her due to matching genders, thought “1984” was about trusting leaders, went around telling people she was shot at, complained Lauer asked her a hard question, etc.  She is the typical power hungry liberal who is part of the 1%, supports crony capitalism, is a lying a rape enabler, and is someone who is all about creating less choices, less freedoms, while demanding more in taxes, and claims to have spent 30 years in “public service”.

Actually she’s spent 30 years mired in one scandal after another!  And it’s the clueless liberal masses who don't even realize what they’re doing when they choose to not only empower those who do nothing more than to propagate all manner corruption in their attempt to advance their own unique brand of tyranny, but also when they choose to defend doing so along the way.  But don't worry, your freedoms will remain secure with the liars, reprobates and cheaters you elect to be charge.  NOT!  They choose to believe whatever it is that Hitlery, and those like her, choose to tell them.  They take being gullible and naïve to a whole new level.  And sadly, by doing so they place the rest of in jeopardy.

But then, I suppose we can't really blame the old girl for being a little unhinged.  After all, her life has been one traumatic occurrence after another.  She has a husband who cheats on her habitually and yet she is so consumed with political ‘ambition’ that she does all that she can to defend him.  She got snookered into the Whitewater deal, and wasn't able to fully recollect the details.  She had to land in a helicopter in a war zone while imaginary bullets were flying around her head, again so traumatized she forgot all the details.  She brought a reset button to Russia and ended up looking like an absolute buffoon, but we all know that some aide must have tricked her into that stunt.

Also, she helped to steer the Uranium One deal to her Russian friends in order to make up for her embarrassing reset button faux pas, but ‘forgot’ that the Russians had given her husband $500,000 for speaking to them about nothing.  Then she was somehow bamboozled into using a private server, because she doesn't know anything about technology, which is why she carried three devices, because she was confused.  She was so confused about what happened in Benghazi she orchestrated the arrest of some poor shlub who created one of the cheesiest videos ever and proceeded to tell everyone that it was the sole cause of what happened.  And she was seen as being the best candidate the Democrats had for president in 2016.

And then it was when she was confronted by Congress that she got so emotionally distraught that she just blurted out, “What difference, at this point, does it make?” forgetting that she was the one in charge and it was an investigation.  She always seems confused and claims to live under the constant threat of some “vast right wing conspiracy” who, after all these years, is either non-existent or the most inept conspiracy group ever.  So you see, it really can't be her fault, just ask her.  Sadly, unless and until the Clinton's and their equally corrupt “friends in high places” are fully exposed and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, America will continue to rot from within.  

All of which, at least from where I’m standing, begs the question, where the Hell is Attorney General Jeff Sessions?  Or for that matter, where the Hell is FBI Director, Chris Wray?  Are we simply to assume that they too are members of ‘The Swamp’ as well?  Nothing else makes any sense.  It’s now become painfully obvious, and a little more so with each passing day, that what we seem to have here is those involved in the Trump campaign now being investigated, and indicted, after being accused of doing exactly what it was that Hitlery & Co. were so obviously involved throughout the entire 2016 campaign.  It’s just all so very bizarre and more than just a little frustrating, as well as disconcerting. 

THAT ‘LITTLE TIMMY’ KAINE IS A REAL JOKER…

To say that Democrats are bending themselves into pretzels in their continuing efforts to create the notion that they played no role in the continuing ‘Russia scandal’ would be an understatement.  And they continue to be provided with all manner of political cover by their devoted allies in the state-controlled media by pushing the narrative that this is somehow a Trump only problem.  However, as more and more information comes to light, Mueller’s recent indictments notwithstanding, it’s becoming all the more clear that it’s a Hitlery & Co. only ‘scandal.’  And am I the only one able to recognize the fact that it’s the Democrats who always accuse the Republicans of doing what they themselves are buried hip-deep in.   

Which, of course, brings me to our failed candidate for vice president, ‘Little Timmy’ Kaine.  You see, it was during a recent interview that Timmy saw fit to falsely accuse the ‘Washington Free Beacon’ of being behind the funding of the Russian dossier when it’s quite clear they stopped paying Fusion GPS before the firm began working on the dossier.  The Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hitlery & Co., of which Timmy was a primary player, were revealed as funders of the dossier that alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.  Timmy tried to deflect from that fact during a Tuesday interview on the Crappy News Network (CNN), instead incorrectly blaming the ‘Washington Free Beacon.’

It was CNN anchor, and former Fox News reject, Alisyn Camerota who asked Timmy, “Do you see these things as equivalent–of the Hillary campaign looking for dirt from Russians and Russians offering dirt to the Trump campaign?”  To which Timmy responded by telling little more than a big fat whopper.  In responding to Camerota, Timmy said, “If you’re asking about the dossier, that was funded by a conservative, online news publication–the Washington Free Beacon.”  Timmy went on to say, “And they hired a British secret service agent and then when they decided to drop it, apparently…some of the funds used to continue the investigation were used by the Clinton campaign.”  And Timmy knew he was lying.

Because recent reporting would seem to indicate that Timmy’s rather unique version of events is very clearly incorrect.  Because while the ‘Free Beacon’ did in fact pay Fusion GPS for standard opposition research, Fusion GPS did not contract with ex-British agent Christopher Steele until after the conservative news outlet stopped paying the group.  The creation of the dossier also did not occur until the ‘Free Beacon’ had completely removed itself from the equation.  Thus, the DNC along with Hitlery & Co. were the ones solely responsible for funding the creation of this sleazy dossier.   It’s odd that Timmy, who was Hitlery’s running mate, remains so uninformed about this particular timeline. 

Which can lead us then to one of only two possible conclusions.  Either we believe that Timmy is one of the most ignorant dupes on the entire planet, or he is purposefully lying.  Which as we have seen, seems to be standard operating behavior not only for Timmy, but for Democrats in general.  And Camerota is no better because I’m quite sure she views herself as being a bona fide journalist, and as such she should, by this time, know the timeline of the Fusion GPS story.  But, as is usually the case with these journalistic wannabes, she made no attempt to correct Timmy's blatant false, and very dishonest, assertions.  Just one more example of why we view CNN as being the “fake news” organization that it is.

And can we all agree that it would appear that Timmy clearly does not have a very tight grip on reality?  I mean seriously, he's like the crazy old uncle who lives in the attic and only comes down whenever the family needs a little comic relief.  He's also the proud father of a member of Antifa, we found that out when his son was arrested not that long ago, along with other members of Antifa, and forced to remove the mask over his face, how proud Timmy must have been.  What we have is yet another case of where the nut doesn’t fall far from the tree.  But I digress.  My point is that he’s a liar and he knows he’s a liar.  That’s what is so confounding about the Democrats, lying has become second nature to them.

And finally, can you possibly imagine this dolt being a heartbeat away from the Presidency?  He is dumb as a brick, and no offense to bricks everywhere.  He likely would have had a very difficult time understanding his role as vice president and we know this only because he makes ‘Slow Joe’ Biden look like a Rhodes Scholar.  So here we have Debbie Wizzerman-Schultz who has said she didn’t know, John Podesta who said he also didn’t know, Hitlery who said she had no idea and now Timmy attempts to make the point how he didn’t know either.  Now I may have become a little cynical in my old age, but I’m thinking that at least some of these boobs just might not be telling the truth.

DEMOCRATS, “DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO!”…

As I am not someone who makes his living as a political advisor, please excuse my confusion regarding how it is that the Democrats can obtain “information” from foreign nationals with it being nothing more than normal everyday ‘opposition research’, but if the Republicans even speak to a foreigner it’s collusion.  And how is it that no one at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) or among those in charge of Hitlery's campaign, or even the candidate herself, didn't know anything about this “Russian dossier?”  Do they really expect anyone, other than their kooky voter base, to believe that they would spend $8 to $12 Million and not have a clue what it was being used for?  I can understand their idiotic voter base falling for that line of BS, but I would hope that enough of us regular folks still have this thing called commonsense.

Which brings me to this past Sunday’s rather bizarre episode of MSNBC’s “Kasie DC,” during which host Kasie Hunt asked deputy chairman of the DNC, and well-known supporter of the Moslem Brotherhood, Keith Ellison if he thought it was a mistake for the DNC to pay for the so-called Russia dossier manufactured by Fusion GPS about Donald Trump.  Ellison dismissed it as part of the political process in a “modern American election.”  But it is also rather apparent that Ellison is of the opinion that the ONLY candidates that should be permitted to conduct such research are those running for office under the Democrat Party banner.  And what I found as being most remarkable about this entire exchange was the fact that Ellison was able to keep a straight face during the entire thing.  That makes very clear what a skillful liar he is.

And it is a partial transcript of that rather nonsensical exchange that follows:

Ms. Hunt: So, I want to start with the news that we’ve all been focused on this weekend, and that is, of course, the Russia investigation, and what has been unfolding there. And one issue … that Republicans have zeroed in on is the Steele dossier and what we learned from The Washington Post about who paid for that. Now, this happened before you were elected to your position at the DNC but do you think paying for that dossier was a mistake for the party to make?

Jihadi Ellison: You know, opposition research is commonly done by both parties. The real question is, are the statements in the dossier true or are they false? I mean, that’s the real issue. At the end of the day, the findings in that research are things that Trump ought to either deny or and there should be investigations about. That’s the real question. But asking me whether a political party did some background research on a political candidate is like saying, ‘Did you buy lawn signs? Did you buy flyers and literature?’ It’s just part of how campaigns are run in a modern American election.

Now to my way of thinking, manufactured content purchased with the specific intent of smearing one’s political adversary doesn’t exactly fall under the heading of ‘opposition research.’  I see that as being nothing more than a hit job to get someone out of the political picture.  The left doesn’t seem to think that accountability and responsibility apply to them, and they definitely operate under a different set of standards that also seem to be reserve strictly for themselves.  You see, you're not supposed to simply create it out of thin air and you're not supposed to lie, pay for ‘research’ you did not disclose, or pass it on to be used to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on your political opponent.  And this boob, Ellison KNOWS this, and yet he’s out there lying to the American people in an attempt to obfuscate and deceive.

I mean how it is that Donald Trump Jr. going to listen to some Russian who had ‘information’ about Hitlery can be defined as Treason, and yet when Hitlery uses the Russians who supplied a fake dossier in order to sway the American voters to vote for her it was defined as being nothing more than your average, run-of-the-mill ‘opposition research.’  Opposition research is legal. Paying a foreign agent that is working with the Russians to produce ‘fake documents’ to be used as a basis for FISA court warrants on the opposing candidate, not so much.  Ellison is just another liberal hypocrite who simply can’t bring himself to admit what went on here, by the Democrats.  And don't forget, the FBI then went on to use that bogus dossier as their reason to FULLY investigate then president-elect Trump, his family, and campaign staff.

And while I may be wrong about this, though recent events seem to confirm it, I thought elections originally had something to do with having positive reasons to vote for a candidate, not reasons to destroy the other candidate.  Elections used to be about choosing the best candidate, not the mud-spattered survivor of what was nothing more than a political food fight.  And I know that slander, in one form or another, has played a part in virtually every presidential rate since Thomas Jefferson, including Jackson, Lincoln, Goldwater and many others.  But in recent years, that's all it's been about.  I'm trying to recall anything positive in Hitlery’s campaign and I keep coming up empty.  Might that have been the real reason, or at least one of them, why she lost a contest to someone who was a complete outsider?

And finally, are John Podesta, Fusion GPS and other political attack dogs really how we want to go about choosing our national leaders?  And let’s not forget that for 12 months, George Stephanopoulos, Jake Tapper, Chuck Todd, and the other ‘Globalist Media’ whores at CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC have paralyzed America, demanding the impeachment of Trump for imaginary collusion with Russia.  We now know Hitlery, the DNC and Comey's FBI colluded with Russia, paying $12M for Russian spies to produce lies about Trump for the sole purpose of effecting the election, and since, to paralyze Trump's agenda, and to overthrow democracy with their 12 month campaign to impeach Trump.  Now the same bunch at CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC insist Russian interference in America's elections is standard ‘opposition research?’

JEFF FLAKE MAKES NOISE ABOUT RUNNING AS AN INDEPENDENT…

Nothing makes it more clear, when it comes to just how much of a RINO fraud Jeff Flake of Arizona is than the recent news that he is at least now considering running for his seat as an Independent by giving his blessing to an outside organization to conduct polling to explore just such a possibility.  I’m sure everyone remembers when Flake announced last Tuesday that he would not be seeking re-election to a second Senate term next year in light of his dire chances of winning a Republican primary and his frustration with the tenure of President Donald Trump.  Polling showed him trailing his insurgent challenger, Kelli Ward, by double digits.  But now Flake has come up with what he sees as being a Plan B that would likely result in nothing more than to hand the seat to the Democrats.  Which is apparently his preference.

The Centrist Project, which is a group created to recruit independent candidates, apparently approached Flake about running outside the dominant two-party system during a meeting this past Friday.  The senator signaled he was open to the possibility and was interested in what polling would show. A spokesperson for Flake did not respond to an inquiry.  After initial publication of this story, the senator tweeted that an independent run is “not gonna happen.”  Flake tweeted, “I subscribe to the old saw Running as an Independent is the future ... and will always be the future.” And he continued shortly afterward with another post saying, “I am a conservative and a Republican. This fever will someday break and we can rebuild our party once more.”  Personally, I would not trust this guy as far as I could throw him.  

The Centrist Project is planning to poll Flake's chances as an independent in a three-way race this week.  While Flake is skeptical about the feasibility of an independent run, the source says, he indicated he was open to the idea if he's provided a viable path to victory.  Since Flake's announcement last week, a segment of Republican and Independent-leaning donors also have been encouraging the option.  The source attributed Flake's public disinterest in an independent run to public pressure from Republicans.  Joel Searby, a strategist for The Centrist Project said, “Donors and like-minded Americans who care about a functioning democracy are realizing they're going to have to look to new options as party primaries continue to not only encourage but essentially guarantee the most extreme candidates.”

Searby added, “In the case of Jeff Flake, people from both the center-right and center-left realize that they can basically have whichever most extreme Republican emerges from the primary or, as an independent, a level-headed, principled Jeff Flake. When they start thinking in those terms, they begin to realize it's time for reconsidering the old ways.”  And if Flake should launch such a bid, it would further complicate what's already expected to be a highly competitive race.  While Ward has been in the contest for a year, White House aides, leery about her candidacy, have been looking for alternatives.  GOP Rep. Martha McSally made members of the Arizona congressional delegation aware she’s weighing entering the contest, and Jay Heiler, a member of the Arizona Board of Regents, has formed an exploratory committee.

Meanwhile Democrat Rep. Kyrsten Sinema is already in the race and is not expected to face a difficult primary which means that she be able to horde whatever money will predictably be coming her way from all across the country.  You see, this is the way these scumbag RINOs like Flake operate.  They’re never stratified to simply take their ball and go home.  They always feel compelled to take things a step or two beyond that, hoping to inflict as much damage as they can against the team who saw fit to remove them from their ranks.  Because it must always be made to be about them and not, as it was this case, being about what’s best for our country.  They don’t care about what’s best for the country, only about what’s best from them.  Flake learned that lesson very well from his presumed mentor, John McCain.

CHRIS WALLACE ADMITS EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION POINTS TO HITLERY…

Anyone who has spent any amount of time over the years watching Chris Wallace knows how much it must have pained him to say, this Friday on Fox News, that there is “more evidence at this point of Democratic collusion with the Russians” than with Republicans.  How difficult must it have been for poor old Chris Wallace to have to finally admit that the Democrats possess significant blame in this continuing horror show, and essentially admit that Trump has been right all along!  Wallace said, “Obviously the revelations about Hillary Clinton and the Democrats and the Clinton campaign buying or funding that Russian dossier certainly blunts a lot of the efforts to talk about Trump collusion and then the victory yesterday on passing the budget.”

And he continued, “I will say these are short-term victories for the president, but their long-term impact is still to be determined. Let me explain both. On the one hand, the fact that Hillary Clinton or at least her campaign and the DNC was doing business with a foreign national, a British spy to get information from the Russians for this dossier certainly blunts the idea ‘Well, it was the Trump campaign and it was outrageous the Trump campaign had anything to do with the Russians to maybe effect at the election’ because this is far more evidence we’ve ever seen involving President Trump and his campaign that the Democrats were directly involved in trying to get information from the Russians to affect the 2016 campaign.”

And then he went on to add, “Having said that we still don’t know about Robert Mueller, the investigation. Both things could be true that both sides were trying to get aid from a Russians and it seems true the Russians were playing both sides to try to disrupt the election. We have to wait and see. But there is more evidence at this point of Democratic collusion with the Russians than there is Republican collusion with the Russians.”  Oh the horror of colluding with the Russians!  How many Sundays has Mr. Sunday spent on this, trying to discredit our President!  I no longer listen to him, just the wrong way to start a beautiful Sunday morning.  Never listened to him much anyway.  He’s disgusting and he owes Trump an apology!!!!

And I think it’s important to keep in mind that Chris is the guy man who asked the question at the end of the last debate about whether or not Trump would accept the election results. You know, the one that Megyn Kelly and the state-controlled media jumped on as if it had been planned, with it being all they talked about for days.  And it would seem that after watching how things have now played out, I would argue that he asked the wrong candidate that question.  Because it’s been Hitlery who, after nearly a year, still hasn't accepted the election results.  And it is she who is doing far more harm to our “democracy” than anything the Russians have done.  Chris is just another pathological liar, albeit one who is paid to do what it is that comes so naturally.

Chris has always been a willing stooge happy to do the bidding of ‘The Establishment.’  He now finds himself in an uncomfortable position of having to adapt a new narrative if he wishes to remain credible.  Continuing to report on the allegations Trump colluded with the Russians is not only disingenuous, it’s dishonest. The truth is, there’s NO evidence whatsoever that Trump, his campaign staff or his family colluded with the Russians to sabotage our election process or Hitlery's campaign. Alternatively, indisputable evidence has emerged implicating Hitlery, her surrogates and the DNC in colluding with the Russians during the campaign.  Now we need to determine what crimes were committed and whether our system of justice applies to all.

You're disgusting Mr. Wallace.  And you’re about as far removed from being a journalist as you could possibly be. You’re just another stooge willing to the bidding of those on the Left, always willing to dance to whatever tune they play.  Hitlery was arrogant and narcissistic, she thought she deserved to be president, and therefore saw no need to waste time and money going to those states where she was the weakest.  She believed what the polls were saying, that she had the 270 electoral votes she needed to win despite all her lying, corruption and an unwillingness to meet with the media until forced.  And yet she was surprised, even shocked, when she lost.  And there you were Chris, ever ready to defend her to the American people.

I mean when it comes to colluding with the Russians, it’s what Democrats have always done.  They colluded with the Russians all through the Cold War, Obummer plotted to stop missile defense, and substantially reduced America’s nuclear warhead inventory.  But then again, it’s the media that owns the mic, so it can highlight whatever it wants, and that usually means not publicizing news damaging to the liberal cause. The Democrats were crazy to run Hitlery.  Not because she is a bad politician, she isn't.  She can debate and lie with the best of them. They were crazy to overlook how scandal prone she is.  She doesn't just bend the rules and laws. She breaks them, stomps on them and burns them to a crisp! And the Democrats knew that!

But I suppose we shouldn’t be too hard on them.  After all, I’m sure they figured that as long as they had those in the media, like Wallace, firmly in their back pocket they’d be able to successfully navigate through all of the scandals and come out on top.  Because, after all, how difficult was it really going to be to defeat someone like Trump.  They were convinced that after 2008 and 2012 that the media was their ace in the hole.  But it would come to pass that Wallace and his many colleagues in the state-controlled media, despite the countless number of bogus polls showing Hiltery was unstoppable, simply weren’t able to drag Hitlery across the finish line.  And now Wallace and his friends are in danger of having to eat more than a little crow.

WHEN DEMOCRATS PRACTICE TO DECEIVE…

What it is about those in charge of the Democrat Party and a lack of possessing even a most rudimentary understanding of our Constitution?  I mean do they really not understand what it says, or is there something a bit more sinister underway here?  For instance, do they truly possess no understanding of it, or are they simply betting on the fact that those who tend to vote for Democrats don’t understand it or even know what it is.  Personally, I’m thinking that those in charge of the party have a pretty good grasp on what it is that our Constitution says, and they’re pretty confident that the vast majority of those who proudly vote for Democrats haven’t got a clue.  And that’s how those in charge prefer it.   

Which brings me to another example of where we have a high ranking member in the Democrat Party attempting to take advantage of that significant ignorance regarding our Constitution.  Now I’m sure most of us are aware that genuine American History is very rarely taught in our public schools today.  And dare I say that there is a specific reason for this.  Because if the true history of our nation was actually taught then it would be common knowledge that the Electoral College has a purpose and was established by our Founding Fathers, in the Constitution, as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens.

Frankly, I can’t remember another time in my sixty five years of being on this planet where I've ever seen such a dedicated and concerted effort by those in the Democrat Party to convince their followers that the Electoral College is nothing more than something dreamt to somehow rig the system against them.  The most recent attempt came from none other than Democratic National Committee chairman Tom Perez who falsely claimed, yet again, that the Electoral College is not “a creation of the Constitution.”  During a lecture at Indiana University Law School, Perez said the Electoral College “doesn’t have to be there,” asserting that the national popular vote should be the principal standard.

And it was in lying through his teeth that Perez said, “The Electoral College is not a creation of the Constitution. It doesn’t have to be there.”  And he went on to say, “There’s a national popular vote compact in which a number of states have passed a bill that says we will allocate our vote, our electoral votes, to the person who wins the national popular vote once other states totaling 270 electoral votes do the same.”  You know, it’s the fact that he knows he’s lying is what makes his actions all the more disgusting and, dare I say, even more than just a little sinister.  But this is the type of behavior that we have now come to expect from those in charge of the Democrat Party and others one the left.

Perez’s claim that the U.S. Constitution is not a part of the Electoral College is, however, completely false and he knows it.  Because he knows as well as the rest of us that Article II clearly outlines the electoral process, dictating that states must appoint electors who meet and vote for the president.  Article II very clearly states, “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.”  Pretty cut and dry.

Perez has made statements in the past implying that that President Donald Trump actually “didn’t win” the 2016 presidential election because Hiterly won the popular vote.  That’s just one of the many reasons that I have such a difficult time taking anyone in the Democrat Party seriously.  Because they’re nothing but a pack of unprincipled liars.  You can’t tell me that Perez actually believes any of the shit that is constantly coming out of his mouth.  And yet he’s hoping that those to whom he is speaking, will.  And it’s obvious that many of them do, which only encourages losers like Perez to spew even more of their rather toxic and blatantly incendiary rhetoric adding to our era of political incivility.  

Look, the Founding Fathers created the Constitution, which was then approved by the people, and it’s the Constitution that makes very clear the purpose of the Electoral College and the role state legislatures play in shaping it.  Where Perez practices to deceive is when he pretends not to know that every election we have ever had has been won by the candidate with the most Electoral College votes, regardless of popular vote.  Hitlery lost in the very same fashion as has every presidential election loser that came before her, and Trump won the election in the very same way that every other presidential candidate won.  If Perez wants to change the way candidates win the presidency, there’s a process.

Nothing known to us thus far would change how the outcome of the last election was arrived at, Donald J. Trump is the constitutionally elected president of these United States.  And it’s only those afflicted with Trump Acceptance Resistance Disorder, or (TARD), which apparently includes Perez, who refuse to accept that fact.  For those unfamiliar, TARD is a pattern of pathologically dissociative and psychotic behavior, first observed in the late hours of November 8, 2016, and seems only to have increased in severity ever since.  Those afflicted with TARD often exhibit a rather pronounced cognitive dissonance, sudden bouts of rage, uncontrollable crying, suicidal ideation, and extreme butt-hurt.

Typically, those diagnosed with TARD are characterized by the possessing of a persistent unwillingness to accept that Donald Trump is going to “Make America Great Again,” and an overwhelming need to say just about anything in an effort to undermine, discredit or delegitimize our duly elected president.  Individual sufferers can be expected to display signs of paranoia and delusion; and in acute cases psychotic episodes have been observed.  Those afflicted go beyond being simply upset about the results of the 2016 presidential election, it’s those afflicted with TARD who are either completely unwilling or unable to accept reality, and very stubbornly so, despite irrefutable evidence.

And when it comes to those afflicted with this condition, the only known treatment that can be said to be in any way effective is regular exposure to some sort of psychiatric therapy.  The patient must be repeatedly exposed to heavy doses of political reality, and should be made to wear a “Make America Great Again” hat for as long as they are able to tolerate it, with each exposure increasing in length.  And it should be after no less than a week that the patient should be encouraged to be seen in public wearing the ‘MAGA’ hat.  And ultimately, the goal should be to get the patient to where they are comfortable wearing the ‘MAGA’ hat 24/7 without experiencing any outbursts of ‘NeverTrumpisms.’

Be aware that patients with TARD are typically very resistant to any form of treatment, and should always be considered as being rather dangerous whenever they are present in large groups (usually any number over 5).  Any possibility of treatment requires that they be separated from their hive-mind support apparatus since they cannot begin the process of accepting reality in the presence of encouragement towards delusion and irrationality.  Separation may require the assistance of law enforcement.  And if you have a friend or loved one who is suffering from TARD, urge them to seek treatment.  We must help those who can’t help themselves, and together we can beat this scourge, TARD.

But seriously folks, all joking aside, I can’t help but wonder just how many people actually understand all of the unintended consequences that would go along with the Electoral College being made to go away.  Now granted, the Democrats’ wish to scrap it notwithstanding, we're still a very long way from abolishing it, courtesy of a Constitutional amendment.  But people need to be made to realize that if that were to ever happen the nation would essentially end up being run by little more than a hand full of states, all of which are of the very deepest shade of blue.  And why should the folks of, say, Nebraska be left to have what would essentially be no say in who it is that would be elected president?

Or to put it in such a way that even those in the Democrat Party can understand, there are 3,141 counties in America.  Donald Trump won 3,084 of them and Hitlery won only 57.  It would be ludicrous to suggest that the vote of those who encompass a mere 57 counties should dictate the outcome of a national election.  And yet we still have to listen to morons like Perez who continue to harp on the fact that because Hitlery won the popular vote, it’s she who should now be our president.  Why should I, as one who lives in one of those 3,084 countries that Trump won be forced to live in a country shaped by those who live in the 57 counties that Hitlery won?  Come on people, this ain’t rocket science.

REPUBLICAN COLLUSION, EQUALS DEMOCRAT OPPOSITION RESEARCH??

Why is it that we allow the Democrats to get away with describing what the Trump campaign was supposedly involved in during the last campaign as collusion, and what we’re now finding out that Hitlery’s campaign was involved in as harmless ‘opposition research?’  You simply cannot make this shit up!  And do the Democrats really think that a majority of the American people are that stupid?  Now I will admit that in order for one to willingly vote Democrat one also has to be a borderline retard.  There’s no other conclusion you can come to.  And it’s in providing one more bit of evidence to support my premise that I present to you, Democrat Adam Schiff.  Mr. Schiff, you may recall, has been one of the more vocal accusers of collusion, beginning practically on the day after the election.  But it was this past Tuesday, while appearing on MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow Show”, that Schiff, the Ranking Member on the House Intelligence Committee, reacted to a report that Hitlery’s campaign and the DNC helped fund the research that resulted in the Christopher Steele dossier, saying it doesn’t really add much to the Russia investigation and is “part of the effort to discredit” Steele.  So according to Schiff, ‘there is simply no there, there.’

Schiff stated, “We’ve known for some time, at least it’s been publicly reported, that the dossier, or the hiring of Christopher Steele was initially on behalf of one of the Republican candidates, and later on behalf of the Democratic candidate. This was the first confirmation of half of that, but it doesn’t really shed any light where we really need light shed, and that is how much of what Mr. Steele found can be corroborated? How much of it is accurate? We’ve been working hard to answer those questions, which are really what the American people need to know. And, indeed, some of the dossier has been corroborated. What I find most significant about it is the fact that Christopher Steele, no matter who was paying for his services, may have discovered, before our own intelligence agencies that the Russians were going to interfere in our election on behalf of Donald Trump. So, we have a lot of work to do in terms of a lot of the claims in the dossier, but it — I don’t think it really adds much value to know who paid for it, necessarily, and I view this as part of the effort to discredit him, which really doesn’t advance the investigation.”  Nope, there’s nothing to see here folks, nothing at all, just move along.  

And Schiff went on to say, “Republicans are less interested in what did Russia do and how did they do it and how do we protect ourselves? But rather, let’s shift the focus onto any kind of government misbehavior, and maybe if we can suggest that the whole investigation goes back to this dossier and this dossier was opposition research, maybe we can discredit the whole investigation and maybe we can get the country to ignore what Russia, in fact, did. You know, the plain fact is, sometimes what is uncovered in opposition research turns out to be true. And here, if what Christopher Steele found, whether it was working for a Republican candidate and a Democratic candidate later, proved to be true, proved to be of concern to the FBI and to the country, then we need to know it, and we can’t ignore it merely because it came to the surface during a political campaign. So the most important thing is, is it true?”  I’m sensing a bit of desperation on the part of Mr. Schiff.  These guys had to have known that once the digging started they’d have more to worry about than President Trump would.  I can only assume that they thought it a risk worth taking.  Or, was it seen as a way to finally rid themselves of the Clintons? 

And then on Wednesday, also on MSNBC, this time appearing on “Andrea Mitchell Reports,” Schiff accused the Trump administration, Breitbart News and Fox News of all being in cahoots in the promoting of news that was first reported by The Hill last week regarding Hitlery’s involvement in the ‘Uranium One’ deal.  The 2010 deal, covered extensively in Breitbart editor-at-large Peter Schweizer’s book “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich,” that gave Russia control of a significant portion of U.S. uranium.  Schiff again denounced the new attention as a “partisan effort to distract” and accused House Speaker Paul Ryan of being a part of it given three House committees — Judiciary, Government Reform and Intelligence — were involved.  Schiff said, “[T]his had to be orchestrated with the approval of the Speaker of the House.”  And added, “So this is a partisan effort to distract. It’s a partisan effort aligned with what the White House has been urging, and Fox and Breitbart, and which there was no consultation with the Democrats in Congress. And I think that tells you all need to know about whether this is good faith or not.”

Look, ever since Hitlery lost the election Democrats have felt compelled to come up with some sort of an excuse for why it happened.  And there is absolutely no way that they’re going admit, to themselves or anyone else, that she was the worst possible candidate not only to ever run for president, but for any public office.  And then there’s the fact that she was never able to credibly articulate why it was she wanted the job in the first place, other than because it was simply her turn.  That’s why she lost, there was nothing nefarious going on.  And let’s not forget the fact that she was a candidate who ran on a bad platform, and whose campaign was incompetent when faced with someone whose message resonated with many that the Democrats took for granted (or simply flat out ignored).  So they chose to run with the idea that the Russians must have stolen the election for Trump.  They are trying so very hard to spin this as, “Well it doesn't matter whether or not Steele was being honest, the Dossier is still true.”  They had zero proof that any of it was true.  And where is the proof we’ve been waiting for, for over a year?  Yet we have plenty of proof of Hitlery trying to subvert the election and sabotage the political system.

I must admit that when I went to bed on election night I did so ‘knowing’ that I would be waking up to President Hitlery.  And I still remember turning on the television the next morning and seeing ‘President’ Trump thanking all those who had supported and voted for him.  I thought it amazing that Trump had been elected in spite of all the obstacles that he had to overcome.  There was the ‘The Establishment’ Republicans, the Democrat Party and the state-controlled media, who had essentially combined forces in an effort to make sure Hitlery won.  But, as it turned out, it was all for naught.  Can you imagine the shock they must have all felt?  So the only logical next step, at least from their perspective was to do all they could to create the perception that Trump must have somehow cheated because, after all, how else could this outsider have defeated the most qualified person, male or female, to have ever run for president.  But what they seem to have overlooked, for one reason or another, is the fact that Hitlery was also the most corrupt individual to ever run for president.  And when you start defending such a person, you run the risk of having things exposed that might not necessarily work to your advantage.

Even with everything that now seems to be coming to light, I seriously doubt that old Hitlery will spend day one behind bars.  This despite the fact that the Democrats have essentially been caught red-handed.  But they don't care, they’ve got no reason to worry, yet.  Their defenders in the state-controlled media, of which there are many, will now go into overdrive, pulling out every stop imaginable in their effort to defend she who was “the most qualified candidate” ever.  ‘The Establishment’ thought they could do whatever they wanted with impunity, as if we hadn't been paying attention for the last 8, 12 or 25 years.  They all thought it was ‘MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!”  But a funny thing happened on the way to Election Day because we had been paying attention.  We knew what they have been up to.  They chose to suppress our voice, and chose to cast us aside as ‘deplorables’, not worthy of their attention.  Might they be paying attention to us now?  Democrats like Schiff are a rather amusing bunch, with their theories about some “vast right-wing conspiracy” that doesn't exist.  The only “conspiracy” that I know of was hatched exclusively by the Democrats, a pack of rabid liars, and cheats, the whole lot of them.

It’s quite impressive the number of people who are willing to lie and even to perjure themselves in their defense of Hitlery.  And you really do have to wonder about people who can be so easily duped by someone who is so very obviously corrupt.  And while it would be somewhat gratifying to finally see something done to right the enormous number of wrongs perpetrated upon our country by these two grifters, the Clintons, wrongs committed for no other reason than to amass for themselves as much wealth as possible and enough political power to keep those wrongs forever buried, it’s doubtful that either of these two will ever be made to answer for any of the many crimes they have committed, nor the number of lives they have placed in jeopardy.  And to believe that these two have, in any way, been great public servants goes beyond being simply naïve.  They have long been the albatross around the neck of the Democrat Party and yet we have those like Mr. Schiff who stubbornly refuse to accept what the rest of us have known for a very long time.  That Hitlery and ‘Slick Willy’ will forever be nothing more than the equivalent of a stain on a blue dress regarding their place in the history of American politics.